Mandatory vaccinations vs moral objection

  • Thread starter Thread starter Almostconvert
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
If people refuse to vaccinate their kids or themselves because of this, some of them will become infected with measles or chicken pox, etc. and pass this on to others, some of whom will die as a result. Is that morally acceptable?
I really don’t want to get into this argument. Measles and chicken pox are mild childhood illnesses. We have interfered with the natural order of immunity provided by children getting them and now are suffering the consequences.

This does not address the issue at hand. The Church has addressed the lines from 50 years ago, but not the ones from 2015 or that are still being procured.
 
@Thorolfr
The WHO in a number of their resources states that measles is prevented with high dose vitamin a, not a vaccine. Matter a fact, the vaccine on the mmr2 manufacturers insert states can shed measles on urine and from the throat for up to 28 days post vax, which is why there are so many outbreaks following vaccination.
Measles is a form of vitamin a deficiency, similar to how scurvy is a form of vitamin c deficiency. That’s why organizations like “Vitamin Angels” exist in third world nations to pass along extremely high dose Vitamin a supplements to the sick and poor, not a vaccine.

Also, the pox vax has been causing mass outbreaks in children, please research. Again, there’s alternative information to render a tainted vax unnecessary, instead of feeding into fear mongering.
 
Last edited:
Even if it requires that we continue to kill the unborn to maintain? I won’t begin to argue the ins and outs of vaccine safety here. We obviously disagree.
I’m not going to dig up stats, but have you considered the death rate of people who don’t get vaccinated?
 
I really don’t want to get into this argument. Measles and chicken pox are mild childhood illnesses. We have interfered with the natural order of immunity provided by children getting them and now are suffering the consequences.
Measles and chicken pox are not “mild childhood illnesses” for people who already have compromised immune systems. If some child doesn’t get vaccinated, he might get infected and then infect dozens of other people, including elderly people or people with compromised immune systems. For those people, getting the measles or chicken pox could easily be fatal.
 
I’m not going to dig up stats, but have you considered the death rate of people who don’t get vaccinated?
I’m happy to see what you have to offer. And we’re discussing the privilege we have of living on a first world country with access to clean drinking water, sanitation, and healthcare.
 
PJH_74
I’m not going to dig up stats, but have you considered the death rate of people who don’t get vaccinated?

Interesting when the measles doesn’t kill anyone in the Us as a first world nation with access to nutrition. Matter a fact, the mmr has killed more children than the measles. As vaccines are considered medical choices, religious exemptions allow for Christians to have the choice to inject other aborted women’s babies into them or not. We decide not as ethical humans. Thanks
 
Last edited:
@Thorolfr
The WHO in a number of their resources states that measles is prevented with high dose vitamin a, not a vaccine. Matter a fact, the vaccine on the mmr2 manufacturers insert states can shed measles on urine and from the throat for up to 28 days post vax, which is why there are so many outbreaks following vaccination.
Measles is a form of vitamin a deficiency, similar to how scurvy is a form of vitamin c deficiency. That’s why organizations like “Vitamin Angels” exist in third world nations to pass along extremely high dose Vitamin a supplements to the sick and poor, not a vaccine.

Also, the pox vax has been causing mass outbreaks in children, please research. Again, there’s alternative information to render a tainted vax unnecessary, instead of feeding into fear mongering.
I’m a little skeptical…
Among the misinformation circulating in anti-vaccine circles in the United States is the falsehood that vitamin A somehow protects against measles, or that children who are getting measles in the United States are simply vitamin A deficient. Some anti-vaccine groups have even started crowdfunding efforts to send vitamin A supplements to Washington State, a state with over 520,000,000,000 dollars ($520 billion) of gross domestic product in 2017. (Madagascar’s GDP hovers around $10 billion.)

Needless to say, there is no scientific evidence that vitamin A supplementation prevents measles infection. It’s not even a scientific plausibility. However, vitamin A supplementation as an additional treatment of cases of measles in order to prevent death is recommended by some researchers, particularly in places where malnutrition is known to be a problem. The best prevention of measles continues to be the measles vaccine.
 
Last edited:
Measles and chicken pox are not “mild childhood illnesses” for people who already have compromised immune systems. If some child doesn’t get vaccinated, he might get infected and then infect dozens of other people, including elderly people or people with compromised immune systems. For those people, getting the measles or chicken pox could easily be fatal.
Measles, pox, and mumps are classified by Mayo Clinic and the CDC as mild childhood illness. Complications only arise when a child is nutritionally deficient or already sick with influenza. Easily remedied after a week, hence the mildness. Interesting also that children and elderly who are immune compromised are told not to be vaccinated by St Jude’s and John Hopkins, as well as other hospitals since the mmr is a live shedding vaccine. Your claims are overall irrelevant since vaccines are never recommended for those types of individuals, only after they’re well are they recommended.
Back to the topic of the concerns of morality of injecting other womens abortions into ourselves and kids! Thanks
 
Last edited:
40.png
Thorolfr:
Measles and chicken pox are not “mild childhood illnesses” for people who already have compromised immune systems. If some child doesn’t get vaccinated, he might get infected and then infect dozens of other people, including elderly people or people with compromised immune systems. For those people, getting the measles or chicken pox could easily be fatal.
Measles, pox, and mumps are classified by Mayo Clinic and the CDC as mild childhood illness. Complications only arise when a child is nutritionally deficient. Easily remedied after a week, hence the mildness. Interesting also that children and elderly who are immune compromised are told not tic be vaccinated by St Jude’s and John Hopkins, as we’ll as other hospitals since the mmr is a live shedding vaccine. Your claims are overall irrelevant since vaccines are never recommended for those types of individuals. Back to the topic of the concerns of morality of injecting other womens abortions into ourselves and kids! Thanks
Of course people with compromised immune systems are not supposed to get vaccinated, and that’s why they rely on everyone else being vaccinated so that the chance they will get infected is reduced.
 
40.png
Thorolfr:
I’m a little skeptical…
Vitamin A therapy for measles per WHO

Vitamin A therapy reduces the rate and severity of complications, particularly croup, pneumonia and diarrhoea. The duration of hospital stay is reduced in children given supplements of vitamin A.

https://www.who.int/immunization/programmes_systems/interventions/TreatingMeaslesENG300.pdf?ua=1

Many NIH journals confirming also.
Let’s get back to the OPs topic please.
As the article I quote above says, “vitamin A supplementation as an additional treatment of cases of measles in order to prevent death is recommended by some researchers.” There is no evidence that taking Vitamin A will prevent someone from getting measles nor is it likely that most people in a country like the US have a vitamin A deficiency.
 
I will gladly post links that I am able to find, but I will avoid those which are purely speculative. Here is the original research article about Walvax-2:


Note that the work comes out of China, and if you read the Introduction you will see that the research was motivated by the perceived need for Chinese production of vaccines for use in China. I don’t see any evidence in this article or elsewhere that pharmaceutical companies in other countries intend to use Walvax-2.

I tried looking up the deposition by Stanley Plotkin and I believe he was speaking about the aborted fetus cell lines procured in the 1960s. So far I haven’t found anything by him on Walvax-2.

I found several blog items speculating that Walvax-2 might be used (outside of China?) in the future, or that other aborted fetus cell lines might be developed in the future, but seriously I think these are just speculations.

Therefore I myself would suggest continued monitoring and verification of cell lines used to produce vaccines, and proactive communication with pharmaceutical companies and regulatory agencies in the US, Europe, and elsewhere, in order to let them know the moral/ethical objections to the future use of Walvax-2 or any other new aborted fetus cell lines.
 
Last edited:
As the article I quote above says, “vitamin A supplementation as an additional treatment of cases of measles in order to prevent death is recommended by some researchers.” There is no evidence that taking Vitamin A will prevent someone from getting measles nor is it likely that most people in a country like the US have a vitamin A deficiency.
Either way, as stated, these are mild childhood illnesses. They are mild in childhood. We have removed that from the equation. Now the balance is upset. Previously children would be getting measles/chicken pox on a daily basis. Their parents would maintain the immunity they received as children when they had it because they were continually exposed. The vulnerable babies were protected by the immunity passed from a mother who had it and was exposed and through her breastmilk. Now, we have vaccinated children and the immunity from vaccination is wearing off and they are getting it when it IS dangerous. As adults who are pregnant or the elderly who have not maintained immunity through exposure or the babies who do not have immunity through mothers. The danger is not in the children who get it. We no longer have God’s given method of immunity.

But I agree, I would love continued discussion on the moral implications and the Church.

I want to join. I want my children and family to come with me. But I’m afraid to speak with our priest for fear of drawing attention to myself and others who refuse on moral grounds but are now facing the risk of mandated consent. I haven’t even considered if that extends to PSR.
 
As the article I quote above says, “vitamin A supplementation as an additional treatment of cases of measles in order to prevent death is recommended by some researchers.” There is no evidence that taking Vitamin A will prevent someone from getting measles nor is it likely that most people in a country like the US have a vitamin A deficiency.
I belong to the very dedicated community of Vitamin Angels, who use NIH journals as well as WHO resources to demonstrate how Vitamin A is the primary treatment and prevention method of measles in third world nations. They do amazing groundwork in third world regions. You should hit them up and maybe help donate, if you’re so worried about measles. We aren’t worried, so we will agree to disagree as I have done my research and have printed NIH journals confirming all of this information too.

Now back to the topic of other women’s abortions in vaccines.
 
Last edited:
Either way, as stated, these are mild childhood illnesses. They are mild in childhood. We have removed that from the equation. Now the balance is upset. Previously children would be getting measles/chicken pox on a daily basis. Their parents would maintain the immunity they received as children when they had it because they were continually exposed. The vulnerable babies were protected by the immunity passed from a mother who had it and was exposed and through her breastmilk. Now, we have vaccinated children and the immunity from vaccination is wearing off and they are getting it when it IS dangerous. As adults who are pregnant or the elderly who have not maintained immunity through exposure or the babies who do not have immunity through mothers. The danger is not in the children who get it. We no longer have God’s given method of immunity.
If measles was so mild in the past before we had vaccines, why is it estimated that between 1855 and 2005, measles killed about 200 million people worldwide? And how did this supposed God given method of immunity work for most Native Americans when Europeans first came to the Americas and brought diseases to which they had no natural immunity? The answer is that most of them were wiped out.
 
Last edited:
If measles was so mild in the past before we had vaccines, why is it estimated that between 1855 and 2005, measles killed about 200 million people worldwide?
If you examine the graphs from measles and vax introduction, measles declined the most in the US and European regions where nutrition became a focus and living conditions improved. The measles info from the Vital Stats for the US shows that the measles declined without a vaccine, drastically from 1916-1940s. No vax even existed until 1963. God given method of TRUE immunity was from through breastmilk antibodies, which is how the rates declined so quickly with each passing year before vax introduction.
 
Note that the work comes out of China, and if you read the Introduction you will see that the research was motivated by the perceived need for Chinese production of vaccines for use in China. I don’t see any evidence in this article or elsewhere that pharmaceutical companies in other countries intend to use Walvax-2.
Again, I cannot post links. This is from a PBS article discussing the need for fetal tissue in vaccine research: “Fetal tissue was “absolutely critical” to the development of a potential Ebola vaccine that has shown promise, said Dr. Carrie Wolinetz, an associate director at NIH.”

It is ignorant to think that this is not continuing to happen. As I stated before, the original cell lines are beginning to fail. You cannot replicate them indefinitely and scientists have not found an alternative (and why would they with such support for the killing of babies. I’m sure if they made a call for women to help they would have a line out the door ready to sacrifice their babies in the name of science).

Wouldn’t it be neat if we instead focused on successfully treating the complications that arise from these illnesses to make them less “dangerous”?
 
I belong to the very dedicated community of Vitamin Angels, who use NIH journals as well as WHO resources to demonstrate how Vitamin A is the primary treatment and prevention method of measles in third world nations. They do amazing groundwork in third world regions. You should hit them up and maybe help donate, if you’re so worried about measles. We aren’t worried, so we will agree to disagree as I have done my research and have printed NIH journals confirming all of this information too.
I’m sure that the 1,044 individuals in 28 states who got measles in the US from January 1 to June 13, 2019 would be relieved to know that you aren’t worried and that all they would have had to do to not get measles would have been to take more vitamin A…:crazy_face:

And since the number of people who got measles in the US in 2019 was more than double what it was in 2018, is that because people were taking a lot less Vitamin A this year?

I’m starting to think that I must have entered the Twilight Zone.
 
Last edited:
If we think even more about the ethics of aborted fetal cell research, we see also that it is and will be a form of "encouraging abortion”.

The use of the vaccines absolutely does encourage further aborted fetal tissue research, which is condemned by the Catholic Church, moral theologians and ethicists. In addition, see the notes below from the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals case that ruled “fetal tissue research is necessary in order to protect women’s reproductive rights”.

9th Circuit Court of Appeals’ April 11, 2001, decision in Forbes v. Napolitano. In this case, the court referred to the popularity of the polio vaccine, among other things, in order to nullify a state law prohibiting experimentation on aborted fetal tissue. The court’s decision specifically ruled that fetal tissue research must be legal in order to guarantee women the fullest possible range of “reproductive decisions.”

The court, in other words, affirms here the necessary and logical connection between the use of vaccines manufactured from aborted fetal tissue, fetal tissue research and legalized abortion:

“Roe v. Wade held that the constitutional right to personal privacy encompasses a woman’s decision whether or not to terminate her pregnancy. Roe and its progeny established that the pregnant woman has a right to be free from state interference with her choice to have an abortion. These cases do not hold that the State is under an affirmative obligation to ensure access to abortions for all who may desire them. Rather they require that the State refrain from wielding its power and influence in a manner that might burden the pregnant woman’s freedom to choose whether to have an abortion.

A prohibition on aborted fetal tissue research could burden the rights of women and couples to make both present and future reproductive choices. … Experimentation on aborted fetal tissue may foster the development of reproductive technology that is related to reproductive decisions. Governmental restrictions on reproductive decisions are only justifiable given compelling state interests. Carey v. Population Services Int’l , 431 U.S. 678, 688 (1977). “

We should keep in mind that the cell lines are not immortal, meaning they will die off and eventually must be replaced with either new fetal tissue or another source (Scientific fact called the Hayflick limit proved by the very man who worked with these fetal cell lines in the 1960’s)

So why are pharmacists seeking the new fetal cell line PER C6 for their vaccine production? This cell line has been modified with AD5 – which is supposed to provide immortality – but it also is known to introduce carcinogenics.

Again, Hayflick’s work proved these theories years ago, and it’s proven the CDC’s vital need for CONTINUED abortions. It’s a sick industry, it is not Christian or Catholic to promote any of this.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top