Manipulation vs just arguing

  • Thread starter Thread starter struggling4him
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
You don’t explain it. You just don’t reward such behavior at any age. Once they figure out that screaming doesn’t get them what they want, they quit. Some kids take longer to figure it out, but they all figure it out eventually. You’ve just got the hang in there.
I agree, with toddlers and older children. But it just doesn’t work with infants, nor should it be tried. Babies cry when they want or need something, and there is no alternative way for them to communicate. Trying to teach them the lesson that crying isn’t acceptable would be tantamount to abuse.

But more to the point, it doesn’t matter what me, you, or the OP’s mom thinks about this. Its between the couple and it isn’t the place of grandma to criticize.
 
You don’t explain it. You just don’t reward such behavior at any age. Once they figure out that screaming doesn’t get them what they want, they quit. Some kids take longer to figure it out, but they all figure it out eventually. You’ve just got the hang in there.
Uh…no. Consider the heart-breaking case where a child is stuck at the developmental capacity of an infant. They do not ever “figure it out” with regards to being ignored when they cry. They are communicating their displeasure or distress, they are getting ignored, but they don’t have enough going on intellectually to put two and two together. Besides, screaming is the only way they have to let it be known that they need something. They don’t have a Plan B, so they keep at Plan A until they run out of steam. That can be a long nasty wait for everyone involved. When it can’t be helped, it can’t be helped (as some passengers on trans-Atlantic flights can attest), but it is better for everyone to avoid it.

No, children finally get to an age where they are old enough to realize that their wants and needs do not come first. Then they are old enough to not expect to put what they want first all of the time, hey are old enough to understand the concept of waiting until their caretakers can give them what they need, and old enough to expect that crying when crying will do no good is forbidden. Until they are that age, nothing good comes from setting up an infant to have a crying fit. It may teach them a certain insecurity with regards to whether their needs are going to be met when they protest. It teaches them no self-discipline, that is for sure, because self-discipline is beyond their capacity.
 
Uh…no. Consider the heart-breaking case where a child is stuck at the developmental capacity of an infant. They do not ever “figure it out” with regards to being ignored when they cry. They are communicating their displeasure or distress, they are getting ignored, but they don’t have enough going on intellectually to put two and two together. Besides, screaming is the only way they have to let it be known that they need something. They don’t have a Plan B, so they keep at Plan A until they run out of steam. That can be a long nasty wait for everyone involved. When it can’t be helped, it can’t be helped (as some passengers on trans-Atlantic flights can attest), but it is better for everyone to avoid it.

No, children finally get to an age where they are old enough to realize that their wants and needs do not come first. Then they are old enough to not expect to put what they want first all of the time, hey are old enough to understand the concept of waiting until their caretakers can give them what they need, and old enough to expect that crying when crying will do no good is forbidden. Until they are that age, nothing good comes from setting up an infant to have a crying fit. It may teach them a certain insecurity with regards to whether their needs are going to be met when they protest. It teaches them no self-discipline, that is for sure, because self-discipline is beyond their capacity.
Yeah, ignoring crying infants for hours teaches them that they are unloved, helpless, and that nothing they do will result in care or comfort being provided.

On a bigger scale, that’s why orphanage babies often wind up so messed up–they’ve been subjected to that theory for years at a time.

It’s not good for babies or other living things.

(I do believe in allowing older babies to cry limited amounts of time if that’s what it takes to achieve a good night’s sleep for everybody, but in general, a crying baby is trying to tell you something and should not be ignored.)
 
My children generally act the same no matter the time of day. I would think that would be the norm. If one was an angel in the morning and horrible after 5pm there would be something wrong.
You are a lucky guy. It’s standard child development advice that the hours starting around 4 (the “witching hour”) can be especially difficult.

incredibleinfant.com/sleeping/hocus-pocus-witching-hour/

parents.com/parenting/better-parenting/advice/remedies-for-the-witching-hour/

It’s common to have a decline in energy and cheerfulness during the hours leading up to naps or bedtime, with predictable dips and improvements just before and after meals and snacks.

And frankly, even as an adult, I go through more or less the same thing–getting tireder and crabbier as my blood sugar falls, feeling WONDERFUL during and right after meals and having a similar same pattern with sleep.
 
You are a lucky guy. It’s standard child development advice that the hours starting around 4 (the “witching hour”) can be especially difficult.

incredibleinfant.com/sleeping/hocus-pocus-witching-hour/

parents.com/parenting/better-parenting/advice/remedies-for-the-witching-hour/

It’s common to have a decline in energy and cheerfulness during the hours leading up to naps or bedtime, with predictable dips and improvements just before and after meals and snacks.

And frankly, even as an adult, I go through more or less the same thing–getting tireder and crabbier as my blood sugar falls, feeling WONDERFUL during and right after meals and having a similar same pattern with sleep.
All of my children nap. No problem here. And yes, we can “break the schedule” of naps every once in a while and everything is ok. I am not lucky, I am just a parent that is active in parenting and focuses on my children.🤷

It is just not as hard as the “parenting” mags and websites make it out to be. In fact it is somewhat “natural” Until we had “experts” and magazines and blogs to make us freak out over every little thing. Parenting good, happy, well behaved children is quite easy.

And the more we have, the easier it seems to get.

PS

One comment I HATE is “how do you do it?” Or “I could never do what you do.”

Blah!
What poppycock!
 
All of my children nap. No problem here. And yes, we can “break the schedule” of naps every once in a while and everything is ok. I am not lucky, I am just a parent that is active in parenting and focuses on my children.🤷

It is just not as hard as the “parenting” mags and websites make it out to be. In fact it is somewhat “natural” Until we had “experts” and magazines and blogs to make us freak out over every little thing. Parenting good, happy, well behaved children is quite easy.
No, it isn’t always, and you are very fortunate if that is the case for you.

I’m currently parenting a ridiculously easy and cooperative toddler, but previous toddlers were not nearly that agreeable. And I don’t think that’s a question of later children being easier–I’ve also heard of parents who have easy children followed by difficult children. Being “easy” or “hard” has a substantial genetic component, and we shouldn’t take credit (or accept blame) for our children’s God-given personalities.
 
All of my children nap. No problem here. And yes, we can “break the schedule” of naps every once in a while and everything is ok. I am not lucky, I am just a parent that is active in parenting and focuses on my children.🤷
Oh come on. Xantippe is no less involved with her children because she keeps them on a schedule. I can’t believe you guys are still arguing.

You’re a buck up butter cup type of parent. I appreciate that. That was my mom’s style and it worked well for her when I was growing up. If that’s your temperament (and your kid’s temperament) great. Xantippe has posted many times about how it took her years of work to really feel comfortable socializing. It may very well be that she just needs a more structured system for her and her family to really be up for long trips and visits. You and your kids are probably more naturally laid back than her and her family.

There is nothing wrong with how you parent your kids. But it’s also not wrong for her to say that breaking a schedule is rough on her and even rougher on her kids. You parent like my mom did. She parents like my MIL did. Both can produce happy, healthy children. Parents know best how their individual children respond to different situations and challenges.

Regardless if whether the OP chooses to parent like you, Xantippe, or a third way, he and his wife deserve to make those decisions without criticism or a guilt trip from their parents.
 
Oh come on. Xantippe is no less involved with her children because she keeps them on a schedule. I can’t believe you guys are still arguing.

You’re a buck up butter cup type of parent. I appreciate that. That was my mom’s style and it worked well for her when I was growing up. If that’s your temperament (and your kid’s temperament) great. Xantippe has posted many times about how it took her years of work to really feel comfortable socializing. It may very well be that she just needs a more structured system for her and her family to really be up for long trips and visits. You and your kids are probably more naturally laid back than her and her family.

There is nothing wrong with how you parent your kids. But it’s also not wrong for her to say that breaking a schedule is rough on her and even rougher on her kids. You parent like my mom did. She parents like my MIL did. Both can produce happy, healthy children. Parents know best how their individual children respond to different situations and challenges.

Regardless if whether the OP chooses to parent like you, Xantippe, or a third way, he and his wife deserve to make those decisions without criticism or a guilt trip from their parents.
If your children get to their teen years as people that you enjoy and that enjoy you, if they are fit companions and roommates for a wide variety of the people they are likely to encounter in life, self-disciplined and pious according to their upbringing, and so on, you have done well. No one is going to be able to spend an hour with them and discern whether you occasionally subjected them to long car rides as infants. THEY won’t even know, if you don’t tell them! You’ll know, and you’ll know whether you were true to what you thought was best for them and their upbringing at the time, and that is what matters, because their whole upbringing will amount to one little decision like that after another, decisions you have to make because you know them best and you get to enjoy or suffer the consequences of what you decide for your family. The rest of the world ought to butt out, because getting there takes so much work, patience, and plain good luck to raise a child that parents don’t need the distraction. Give advice when it is solicited, then let them do what they decide to do, bite your tongue, and hope their kids somehow come out alright in spite of their incompetence (because, of course, all parents are incompetent, any psychologist can tell you that! :D)
 
Oh come on. Xantippe is no less involved with her children because she keeps them on a schedule. I can’t believe you guys are still arguing.

You’re a buck up butter cup type of parent. I appreciate that. That was my mom’s style and it worked well for her when I was growing up. If that’s your temperament (and your kid’s temperament) great. Xantippe has posted many times about how it took her years of work to really feel comfortable socializing. It may very well be that she just needs a more structured system for her and her family to really be up for long trips and visits. You and your kids are probably more naturally laid back than her and her family.

There is nothing wrong with how you parent your kids. But it’s also not wrong for her to say that breaking a schedule is rough on her and even rougher on her kids. You parent like my mom did. She parents like my MIL did. Both can produce happy, healthy children. Parents know best how their individual children respond to different situations and challenges.

Regardless if whether the OP chooses to parent like you, Xantippe, or a third way, he and his wife deserve to make those decisions without criticism or a guilt trip from their parents.
Oh come on. Xantippe is no less involved with her children because she keeps them on a schedule. I can’t believe you guys are still arguing.
:eek:

No that is not what I was saying at all! First of all, I don’t think she mentioned her kids or parenting at all.

But I do notice that some parents styles work better than others. And I have seen ten kid families with well behaved children and a smooth life and 5 kid families that have the look of a refugee family. It is not because 5 kids genetically were different and 10 kids were genetically the same. Yes, each kid has very very distinct challenges and personalities but there is a reason some families run a tad smoother than others.
 
:eek:

No that is not what I was saying at all! First of all, I don’t think she mentioned her kids or parenting at all.

But I do notice that some parents styles work better than others. And I have seen ten kid families with well behaved children and a smooth life and 5 kid families that have the look of a refugee family. It is not because 5 kids genetically were different and 10 kids were genetically the same. Yes, each kid has very very distinct challenges and personalities but there is a reason some families run a tad smoother than others.
Having said that, “Any landing you walk away from is a good one.”

Let us say a parent says this, a typical trip report from an experienced parent: “We took our infant to France and he screamed for the whole nine hour plane ride. Although every adult on the plane will remember it until the day they die and may never agree to another trans-Atlantic flight again, he was right as rain within two days, doesn’t remember a thing about the flight, and has been a very happy baby since.” I think that ought to be both a reassurance that a baby can resiliently sail through these things from time to time and a caution that the parents themselves may want to take heed. If a child learns to expect that they’re going to be miserable every time they get into a car, of course by then you have bitten off some trouble that you are going to be dealing with for a long time. If lightning only strikes infrequently, most infants are better sports than any of the rest of us. (Caveat: This TOTALLY changes somewhere between the ages of 13 and 18 months. Ask me about how one unfortunate babysitting experience resulted in a leeriness towards women visitors that lasted three or four years, even though those two once-fearful boys remember nothing about it now!)

Parenthood requires striking just the balance between paranoia and blissful negligence over what could possibly go wrong that is right for you! 😃
 
:eek:

No that is not what I was saying at all! First of all, I don’t think she mentioned her kids or parenting at all.

But I do notice that some parents styles work better than others. And I have seen ten kid families with well behaved children and a smooth life and 5 kid families that have the look of a refugee family. It is not because 5 kids genetically were different and 10 kids were genetically the same. Yes, each kid has very very distinct challenges and personalities but there is a reason some families run a tad smoother than others.
How do you know what the genetic or personal issues might or might not be in play? It’s not like the 5-kid family members are all wearing signs saying, “Grandpa’s a bit OCD, Auntie has serious ADHD and has lots of other issues and mom and dad are a little bit autistic, just like both of mom’s parents and dad’s dad. Oh, and mom’s a mess because she still hasn’t gotten over her miscarriage.”

The more I know, the more I see the power of genetics in families and the less willing I am to ascribe everything 100% to parenting, good or bad. I believe in the power of conscientious parenting (I’m CAF’s resident positive reinforcement nut), but we as parents are limited by the properties of the human material we are working with.
 
How do you know what the genetic or personal issues might or might not be in play? It’s not like the 5-kid family members are all wearing signs saying, “Grandpa’s a bit OCD, Auntie has serious ADHD and has lots of other issues and mom and dad are a little bit autistic, just like both of mom’s parents and dad’s dad. Oh, and mom’s a mess because she still hasn’t gotten over her miscarriage.”

The more I know, the more I see the power of genetics in families and the less willing I am to ascribe everything 100% to parenting, good or bad. I believe in the power of conscientious parenting (I’m CAF’s resident positive reinforcement nut), but we as parents are limited by the properties of the human material we are working with.
It occurred to me we are arguing one of the oldest discussions in the realm of human behavior. Nature Vs. Nurture. You are on the nature side and I the nurture.

Just two people who have a differing opinion.😉 I will say our family is quite versed in genetics given the issues with daughter number two and the wife’s profession. We are aware of our genes. But more than anything I am aware that while each of my children are completely different, the behavior modified by our parenting is pretty much spot on.
 
Having said that, “Any landing you walk away from is a good one.”

Let us say a parent says this, a typical trip report from an experienced parent: “We took our infant to France and he screamed for the whole nine hour plane ride. Although every adult on the plane will remember it until the day they die and may never agree to another trans-Atlantic flight again, he was right as rain within two days, doesn’t remember a thing about the flight, and has been a very happy baby since.” I think that ought to be both a reassurance that a baby can resiliently sail through these things from time to time and a caution that the parents themselves may want to take heed. If a child learns to expect that they’re going to be miserable every time they get into a car, of course by then you have bitten off some trouble that you are going to be dealing with for a long time. If lightning only strikes infrequently, most infants are better sports than any of the rest of us. (Caveat: This TOTALLY changes somewhere between the ages of 13 and 18 months. Ask me about how one unfortunate babysitting experience resulted in a leeriness towards women visitors that lasted three or four years, even though those two once-fearful boys remember nothing about it now!)

Parenthood requires striking just the balance between paranoia and blissful negligence over what could possibly go wrong that is right for you! 😃
Absolutely!
 
Why exactly are we arguing over whether having a bad day as an infant will effect a person for the rest of their life? Isn’t not wanting a bad day for one day enough of a reason to visit on a Saturday instead of a Sunday? Assuming there are no other factors are at play (other guests being involved or other obligations which make Saturday inconvenient for MIL) why would someone choose an uncomfortable afternoon over a good one?
 
Why exactly are we arguing over whether having a bad day as an infant will effect a person for the rest of their life? Isn’t not wanting a bad day for one day enough of a reason to visit on a Saturday instead of a Sunday? Assuming there are no other factors are at play (other guests being involved or other obligations which make Saturday inconvenient for MIL) why would someone choose an uncomfortable afternoon over a good one?
Very good point. This thread has indeed taken a detour.

It would be nice if the OP would drop in and let us know some more…
 
A couple of thoughts.
It is manipulative. That you don’t see it is alarming. Does your wife think you are kind of a mama’s boy?

You defended you mom to your wife like that!!?? Wow. Is the couch comfortable?😃
I side with your wife. It is time for you to be your own man with your own family. It is time for you to be on your wife’s team and move beyond the fact that you are your moms little boy and she wants you to drop everything for her birthday. The compromise that was acceptable (the day before) was rejected by her. 🤷

I’m going to let you in on a little hint guy to guy.
The reason it seems trivial is because it is not about the Birthday to your mom or your wife. It is the manifestation of frustrations on both parts. Your mom for not having control over her son anymore. And your wife for needing a husband who is his own man and on her team. You better buy her some flowers and maybe, just maybe she will go down and wish your mom a happy birthday on saturday with you, because that is the correct solution.

(Aside from the “sleep schedule” thing I also question your parenting, but not of your child, of your mom.) You gave in.

Mom 1
You and wife 0

Good luck. Take my advice and side with your wife on this. I guarantee your bed is more comfortable than your mom’s couch…
Oh yes. Truer words were never spoken. This poster hit the nail on the HEAD. Sleep schedule is a smokescreen on both of your parts. This is an issue about whose wishes (therefore whose love and approval) takes first place in your marriage. The answer had better be your wife. Take it from a wife who walked in your wife’s shoes x1000. You are doing your wife and your marriage a HUGE disservice by siding with your mother. It puts her above your marriage. Going alone sends a clear signal to your mother that she has the upper hand and that your wife and marriage really aren’t that important. Do not.Do that to your wife. This seems like nothing to you because, no offence, you’re a guy and have yet to amass the epic knowledge of our wise poster Hoosier daddy. It’s never that simple to women. Ever.

Do yourself a HUGE favor and read his reply again. And if you think you should do something else, read it again. I really mean this all in love. He’s right, in bed with your wife is a much better place to sleep than on the couch at your mom’s.
 
Oh yes. Truer words were never spoken. This poster hit the nail on the HEAD. Sleep schedule is a smokescreen on both of your parts. This is an issue about whose wishes (therefore whose love and approval) takes first place in your marriage. The answer had better be your wife. Take it from a wife who walked in your wife’s shoes x1000. You are doing your wife and your marriage a HUGE disservice by siding with your mother. It puts her above your marriage. Going alone sends a clear signal to your mother that she has the upper hand and that your wife and marriage really aren’t that important. Do not.Do that to your wife. This seems like nothing to you because, no offence, you’re a guy and have yet to amass the epic knowledge of our wise poster Hoosier daddy. It’s never that simple to women. Ever.

Do yourself a HUGE favor and read his reply again. And if you think you should do something else, read it again. I really mean this all in love. He’s right, in bed with your wife is a much better place to sleep than on the couch at your mom’s.
I wish I could make my signature this post. 😃

Thanks for the endorsement!
 
Very good point. This thread has indeed taken a detour.

It would be nice if the OP would drop in and let us know some more…
Yes. It is not that the grandmother is right and the mother is wrong or vice versa because there is some correct way to raise children.

The mother is right because she is The Mom, and The Mom and The Dad Decide. The number one proponent of that rule needs to be her husband, and his number one job is impressing this fact upon his half of the family.

It is vital to have that principle well-established before that child starts talking, and starts agreeing with Grandma! 😃

I am not really joking that much*–
“The reason grandparents and grandchildren get along so well is that they have a common enemy.” - Sam Levenson*
 
Please forgive me if I repeat what has already been said, but my battery is dying and I stopped reading on page 4.

I think the OP is being manipulated, not by his DM but by his DW. They had agreed beforehand that he could make the trip on his own, but after that compromise is made, she Is no longer satisfied with it.

I firmly believe that after marriage a man or woman’s first allegiance should be to the spouse, but let’s not change the rules in the middle of the game.

And the fact that this trip was a birthday celebration has, to me, a great deal of bearing on the circumstances. If hie DM’s birthday was on Sunday, it’s perfectly logical to assume that they would celebrate on that day. Given that, it’s entirely possible that his parents would have made other plans for Saturday. If you want to do something nice for a person, you do what makes that person happy, not what’s easiest for you. It’s like picking out a red sweater as a gift for someone who hates red, just because you like that particular sweater.

I don’t set much store by having my birthday celebrated with great pomp or care when it’s celebrated. At this point in my life, the thrill has long since worn off. And I firmly believe that parents who are actively parenting children should be the ones who feted at Mother’s/Father’s Day celebrations, not those of us who have reached “active reserve” status. But darn it, if you do want to do something for me, do something for me or don’t bother doing anything.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top