M
mrsbvm
Guest
This is a question for a Canon lawyer-type. How far does the following Canon reach?
Can. 1153 §1 A spouse who occasions grave danger of soul or body to the other or to the children, or otherwise makes the common life unduly difficult, provides the other spouse with a reason to leave, either by a decree of the local Ordinary or, if there is danger in delay, even on his or her own authority.
Does the “danger of soul” have to come directly from the other spouse? What about other family members living or not living in the home? For example, my stepdaughter has chosen to live with her fiance until they get married next year. I have a 12-year old at home and am battling to keep her from knowing this is happening. Also, my mother-in-law recently moved in with us and I find out she has a subscription to one of those grocery store tabloid magazines. Do either of these situations pose a “danger of soul” to my daughter to the point of justifying separation?
Can. 1153 §1 A spouse who occasions grave danger of soul or body to the other or to the children, or otherwise makes the common life unduly difficult, provides the other spouse with a reason to leave, either by a decree of the local Ordinary or, if there is danger in delay, even on his or her own authority.
Does the “danger of soul” have to come directly from the other spouse? What about other family members living or not living in the home? For example, my stepdaughter has chosen to live with her fiance until they get married next year. I have a 12-year old at home and am battling to keep her from knowing this is happening. Also, my mother-in-law recently moved in with us and I find out she has a subscription to one of those grocery store tabloid magazines. Do either of these situations pose a “danger of soul” to my daughter to the point of justifying separation?