R
rcwitness
Guest
Sounds fun.
Its actually a little bit where we are at regarding Contraceptives.
But she is Catholic and she is not resisting, but not fully convinced.
Sounds fun.
I suspect this is true for many (if not most?) Catholics who follow the Church’s teaching on contraception. It is a hard teaching, to understand and to follow; thus, obedience may be even more meritorious.But she is Catholic and she is not resisting, but not fully convinced.
The wife may very well know what the Church teaches, yet disagree with it.I think the biggest part of the problem is that the wife does not know properly the church teaching regarding the issue. I think first the husband needs to talk with her…and I repeat talk in a respectful way…and explain to her that she is not right, that the church teaching is not hateful and then proceed to explain the actual teaching. That the church believes in the dignity and respect of all humans includingbthose with SSA. That we have to be compassionate. That SS attraction is a temptation that the problem is acting on it. That being compassionate and loving someone does not mean that we have to accept when an action is wrong. that there is right and wrong and we have a duty of fraternal correction and we have to point out wrong actions. Maybe trying that would be a good idea in the first place because it is clear that she does not know the right teaching.
This would be the case, yes.The wife may very well know what the Church teaches, yet disagree with it.
This is tough because there is hypothetical children involved and it’s hard for them to grasp certain concepts sometimes (depending on the age).Sorry, I’ll try to elaborate further on each of your questions.
Yes, he knows what the Church teaches, probably better than a lot of Catholics. There are a few reasons for this (including lots of scrupulosity in the past, and still some in the present.)
And yes, he has nothing but the deepest love and respect for all people. He believes that we’re all sinners, and that we’re all deserving of love and respect.
The wife believes that there’s nothing wrong with the behavior, and further she believes that it’s wrong to tell someone who’s gay that they can’t be with someone. She knows that the Church comdemns homosexuality, but her stance is that no religion is perfect (though she tries in her own way to be a faithful Catholic, and I don’t think she really grasps the importance of papal infallibility, the magisterium,
Thanks for sharing.I said I would try to open up a little bit about why I asked the question, so here goes. Please, be gentle with me… This is hard. I’m going to make it short, and I’m going to skip over a lot of personal details. But the gist of it is this:
Firstly, thank you for sharing your story. I know it can be very hard opening up, so I personally feel very honored that you blessed us with your story. Doesn’t it feel better?I said I would try to open up a little bit about why I asked the question, so here goes. Please, be gentle with me… This is hard. I’m going to make it short, and I’m going to skip over a lot of personal details. But the gist of it is this:
I’m a walking contradiction. I’m Catholic, and I take it seriously, but I also can’t say that I really truly believe it. It’s not that I don’t want to (though there as things that are very hard), just that I’m not entirely convinced that it’s the truth. Or more accurately, I actively doubt that it’s true. I don’t choose to doubt, it’s just the way it is. At most, I suspend disbelief, because I think that to turn my back on what I already know for what’s less known would not be the morally upright decision, and I can’t say that I have the necessary evidence to conclude definitively that the Church is in error. So I make an assent of faith, because that’s all I can do.
My motivations are not pure, of course; I have a lot of biases both for and against the Church that make it extremely difficult to be objective in my search for the truth, as much as I strive for objectivity. Some of them are psychological (the scrupulosity, which is a symptom of an OCD-like disorder), some of them are selfish (a fear of Hell that makes me want to argue in favor of the Church because I fear judgement; anger at God for all the suffering I’ve dealt with for most of my life and the fact that I feel left out, that it’s hard to be Catholic and that I just “want to be normal like everybody else,” which makes me want to argue against the Church), and some of them I’m sure are simply the result of societal conditioning (compounded by the fact that I did not grow up Catholic; I converted from a generic doesn’t-go-to-church non-Catholic Christian in High School, so I know what I’ve had to give up and I’m aware of “what I’m missing.”)
I don’t forsee this doubt being resolved anytime soon. This gets us to the first half of why I’m asking.
I feel that I’m not Catholic enough for a devoutly Catholic spouse (it’s my perception that many devoutly Catholic women, when they talk about their ideal man, don’t wish for someone like me), and I also feel that I’m not secular enough for a secular spouse. I feel that no matter which side of the field I land on, I’m not going to find someone who can completely accept me for who I am. I’m also not sure that I could handle living with either a devoutly Catholic spouse (I admit this is due to personal bias and anger, primarily over the turmoil inside myself – I know that’s not fair), and I also know I couldn’t live with a secular spouse, because they most likely would not share my love of God and desire to search for the truth with me, and because they would be even less likely to be able to understand my obligations as a Catholic.
I’ve also decided that I’m not going to spend the rest of my life alone (subject to the will of God, of course, which has overridden me on many occasions, I admit usually to my benefit.) I’ve been alone most of my life, and it’s been very painful, and I’ve felt called to marriage from a very early age. I’m not going to let the tempest inside my soul prevent me from finding someone I can spend the rest of my life with.
And this gets me to the second half of why I’m asking.
I’ve met someone I really care about. We’ve been dating (chastely; I’ve been committed to chastity since 2008) for a few months, and we get along very well. She was born Catholic. She doesn’t understand it, but she goes to mass every Sunday and holy day and tries very hard to live a good life in the way she knows how. She doesn’t understand the magisterium, she believes that no religion is perfect (and she’s not going to suddenly believe in these things just because someone says it’s true), and she has beliefs that are in opposition to the Church. But I believe she’s doing her best, and I care very deeply for her. I believe that if we could work through the moral issues, she would be able to accept that I disagree with her while also understanding how important it is for me to be able to live my
If it doesn’t, perhaps someone else out there who is also imperfect in their adherence to the Church could. Or, it’s also always possible that someday I’ll meet a devout Catholic that I can love, and who can accept me, my hanging-by-a-thread faith and all. It could happen
Sorry, that wasn’t quite as short as I wanted it to beHopefully that makes some sense.
Please be gentle…
Yes, that’s probably true. I do have the tendency to blow things up. I always back myself up into an intellectual corner and then feel as if there’s no way out. I’m trying to train myself to recognize these apparent contradictions as expressions of a scrupulous mind, but it’s very hard.Perhaps there are specific issues between you and this woman you are seeing, but I suspect, based on your overly scrupulous nature and tendency to worry (evidenced in the above post), that you have built them in your mind to be bigger than they really are. Feel free to share further when you feel comfortable; there’s really nothing we haven’t heard on this forum before.
If you hold that attitude, it is unlikely that the issue of “head of the household” will ever have any practical implications for your marriage anyway. Which is to say, couples who view marriage as a parntership will be likely to respectfully work through issues together.If push comes to shove, I have to be honest and say that I really believe in my heart that marriage is an equal partnership.
Your obligation, your duty, is to love your wife.Thanks, everyone. I appreciate the support a lot. I’m glad I took the time to open up to you all
I have another question. I’ve struggled a lot with the “head of the household” role. I’ve studied it a lot, and I understand the other side of the equation, that the husband is supposed to love his wife, and in so doing, not be a petty tyrant or a dictator, and that the wife is equal in dignity though not equal in her role. Still, the idea of a hierarchy that places the wife beneath the husband in any way leaves a very bad taste in my mouth. This is an example of an issue that raises very strong negative emotions and objections inside of me, so I hope you’ll forgive me if my words sound forceful in any way. It’s just something that I struggle with a lot internally.
What exactly is my moral obligation when filling the role as the head, and how much of my authority in the household is up to my own prudential judgement? The kind of independent woman that I’m attracted to would not be happy to have to submit to me, and I would be extremely unhappy making her submit to me (or even suggesting it), even in a small way.
If I determine that it would be a violation of her dignity to command her to obey even in matters where there are serious moral issues, or if I simply decide that it would be a bad idea because it would sow discord and discontent in the marriage, would I be guilty of sin? Would it be serious sin? Again, scrupulosity comes into play here; I have a hard time trusting my own judgement, and will always find reasons to second guess it and to imagine that the Church demands more of me that it really does.
If push comes to shove, I have to be honest and say that I really believe in my heart that marriage is an equal partnership. The authority of the husband over the wife is another one of those things that so far I’ve had to just suspend disbelief on.
I promise I’m trying to figure things out… Thank you all again!
Thank you. I still struggle with the theological aspect itself, but practically speaking, it’s my feeling that the dynamic of the marriage will depend on the individuals involved, and I think I would approach the marriage as you have.If you hold that attitude, it is unlikely that the issue of “head of the household” will ever have any practical implications for your marriage anyway. Which is to say, couples who view marriage as a parntership will be likely to respectfully work through issues together.
This (equal parntership) is how I view it, and my marriage has gone very well so far (over ten years). I have never pulled rank…and I doubt it would get me anywhere anyway. That’s not to say that my wife doesn’t defer to my judgement at times; as I do with her on certain issues.
Yes, I agree. Always, this is the most important thing.Your obligation, your duty, is to love your wife.
In everybody’s favorite verse on this (Ephesians 5) it’s, “21 Be subject to one another out of reverence for Christ. 22 Wives, be subject to your husbands, as to the Lord. 23 For the husband is the head of the wife as Christ is the head of the church, his body, and is himself its Savior. 24 As the church is subject to Christ, so let wives also be subject in everything to their husbands. 25 Husbands, love your wives, as Christ loved the church and gave himself up for her, 26 that he might sanctify her, having cleansed her by the washing of water with the word, 27 that he might present the church to himself in splendor, without spot or wrinkle or any such thing, that she might be holy and without blemish. 28 Even so husbands should love their wives as their own bodies. He who loves his wife loves himself. 29 For no man ever hates his own flesh, but nourishes and cherishes it, as Christ does the church, 30 because we are members of his body. 31 “For this reason a man shall leave his father and mother and be joined to his wife, and the two shall become one flesh.” 32 This mystery is a profound one, and I am saying that it refers to Christ and the church; 33 however, let each one of you love his wife as himself, and let the wife see that she respects her husband.”Thank you. I still struggle with the theological aspect itself, but practically speaking, it’s my feeling that the dynamic of the marriage will depend on the individuals involved, and I think I would approach the marriage as you have.
Yes, I agree. Always, this is the most important thing.
Thank you, everyone. You’ve eased a lot of my fears. I still struggle with being Catholic, but at least I no longer feel like the Church is asking of me something that’s impossible. That’s what always happens with scrupulosity; the weight of “what ifs” and the inability to trust your own judgement becomes so overbearing that it renders you incapable of recognizing and adapting to the practical realities of everyday life. I no longer feel as if I’m destined to be alone the rest of my life, and that in and of itself I think will allow me to continue to accept my faith while I struggle with the intellectual problems I’m trying to resolve.
I’m still very interested in what others have to say, so I hope the discussion will continue.
Thanks again!