P
Petergee
Guest
JP2 does not state anywhere in this document that “marriage is not inferior to celibacy”, as Mannyfit claimed JP2 affirmed.
JP2 does not state anywhere in this document that “marriage is not inferior to celibacy”, as Mannyfit claimed JP2 affirmed.
So that would mean that what you said earlier is not entirely accurate. Instead of saying:For God, of course.
But I think you mean “By whom?”, to which the Christ and St Paul answer, those who are able to receive it.
No, I wouldn’t. Celibacy for the Kingdom is a greater good than marriage, full stop. The fact that only some people are able to accept celibacy is a different point.So that would mean that what you said earlier is not entirely accurate. Instead of saying:
“But celibacy for the sake of the kingdom of God is a greater good than marriage”
…it would be most accurate to say:
“But celibacy for the sake of the kingdom of God is a greater good than marriage for some people”
Wouldn’t you agree?
…
Hmm.No, I wouldn’t. Celibacy for the Kingdom is a greater good than marriage, full stop.
It seems you are implying that all those who are not able to accept celibacy have made a decision of lesser value to God.The fact that only some people are able to accept celibacy is a different point.
For all God’s people, or for some?I would say that celibacy for the Kingdom of God is indeed better overall
Why would God call anyone to a vocatiuon that is a lesser good and less than the best for them?Still I don’t think there’s any shame at all in knowing your vocation from God.
But that is exactly how you phrased it above.Marriage inferior to celibacy… I don’t think that’s the right way to phrase the issue at all.
That’s like saying “Christ’s death and resurrection was the greatest thing that ever happened to the human race, so why didn’t God let it happen “right on the spot” with Adam and Eve?” Marriage is naturally good, and Christ raised it to the status of a Sacrament. I guess if the Fall had never occurred, celibacy would never have been necessary.Hmm.
Can you explain why God would not bless Adam and Eve with the greater good and instituted marriage right on the spot for them?
You keep implying I have said EVERYONE should be celibate, when I have explicitly stated the opposite in every post. Don’t worry I’m sure there’s no chance that the human race will become extinct because of people choosing celibacy for the sake of God’s Kingdom. In fact history has repeatedly shown that where there are many choosing celibacy for the Kingdom, there is a high fertility rate.If the greater good is the end of the human race, why would that not be more of a theme in God’s Word?
No I’m not. Only God can see into anyone’s soul and judge the value of each of the decisions each person makes. God knows each of us intimately and does not ask anyone to bear a burden which He knows he/she can’t carry. My point, and that which the Church has constantly taught, is that celibacy for the Kingdom is objectively a greater good than marriage.It seems you are implying that all those who are not able to accept celibacy have made a decision of lesser value to God.
As to accepting celibacy, Christ qualified that beforehand:
“Not all men can receive this precept, but only those to whom it is given” (Mt 19:11)
Again you accuse me claiming something which I have explicitly and repeatedly rejected. Please address what I said, not a straw-man argument which I did NOT say.Again, it seems you are claiming that all “have been given,” not some…all are called to celibacy for the Kingdom.
I am just trying to take it as you stated it.Then take it that way.
Can you please quote where Christ said it is better to be celibate.If Christ says it’s better to be celibate, and He did
Wait a second. I think there are some mixed signals here.You keep implying I have said EVERYONE should be celibate, when I have explicitly stated the opposite in every post.
If the objective greater good for humanity is total celibacy (not some as you confirmed), then if we all lived up to the greatest good we would cease to exist.Don’t worry I’m sure there’s no chance that the human race will become extinct because of people choosing celibacy for the sake of God’s Kingdom. In fact history has repeatedly shown that where there are many choosing celibacy for the Kingdom, there is a high fertility rate.
When I say “full stop”, I do NOT mean “now add the words “for all people””. Your silly word games are wasting everybody’s time. If you disagree with me, fine, then use real arguments to support your thesis. Don’t put words into my mouth and then complain because the words you accused me of saying “send mixed signals” .Wait a second. I think there are some mixed signals here.
You clearly said earlier:
“celibacy for the sake of the kingdom of God is a greater good than marriage”
I then asked: “For who?”
You replied who your statement applies to:
“those who are able to receive it.”
By definition, that is only some people. So I then replied:
"it would be most accurate to say:
'But celibacy for the sake of the kingdom of God is a greater good than marriage for some people’"
You then corrected me:
“No, I wouldn’t. Celibacy for the Kingdom is a greater good than marriage, full stop.”
How can celibacy for the Kingdom not be the greater good for some people (you said no) and not the greater good for all people at the same time?
If the objective greater good for humanity is total celibacy (not some as you confirmed), then if we all lived up to the greatest good we would cease to exist.
…
Matthew 19:12 “Some are incapable of marriage because they were born so; some, because they were made so by others; some because they have renounced marriage for the sake of the kingdom of heaven. Whoever can accept this ought to accept it.” (NAB).I am just trying to take it as you stated it.
Can you please quote where Christ said it is better to be celibate.
I can’t find that anywhere.
…
Matthew 19:10-12Can you please quote where Christ said it is better to be celibate.
I can’t find that anywhere.
Sorry, Michael, but nowhere in there does Christ say celibacy is better.Matthew 19:10-12
"10 His disciples say unto him: If the case of a man with his wife be so, it is not expedient to marry.11 Who said to them: All men take not this word, but they to whom it is given. 12 For there are eunuchs, who were born so from their mother’s womb: and there are eunuchs, who were made so by men: and there are eunuchs, who have made themselves eunuchs for the kingdom of heaven. He that can take, let him take it. "
You are really growing very defensive and angry over this whole issue. If we cannot discuss this without accusations and anger, then we can just drop it. I have no problem discussing this civily.When I say “full stop”, I do NOT mean “now add the words “for all people””. Your silly word games are wasting everybody’s time. If you disagree with me, fine, then use real arguments to support your thesis. Don’t put words into my mouth and then complain because the words you accused me of saying “send mixed signals” .
How about the Holy Spirit?Can you please quote where Christ said it is better to be celibate.
I can’t find that anywhere.
…
This is, by far, the best example of the greater good of celibacy that I have ever heard. The crux of the issue is in your last sentence, “It is wrong to view these two goods as being in opposition to each other.” We are not in a “holier than thou” contest. We are called to be holy and to encourage everyone around us to be holy as well.Caring for people with cancer is good.
Discovering a cure for cancer would be a greater good. But very few people would be able to do it. And it is wrong to view these two goods as being in opposition to each other.
Those are excellent points, LittleDeb!Celibates for the sake of the Kingdom are married, to Christ and to the Church.
…
It has been said that celibates for the Kingdom have skipped over earthly marriage for a heavenly marriage on earth. Not all are called to it here, but we are all surely called to the marriage feast in heaven. We are the Church. We are the Bride of Christ.
I think what Petergee is trying to say is that celibacy in and of itself is the greater of two goods (marriage and celibacy). Then, added that not all are called to be celibate. The fact that not all are called, does not invalidate the fact that celibacy is still a higher calling.How can celibacy for the Kingdom not be the greater good for some people (you said no) and also not the greater good for all people at the same time?