W
Wil_Peregrin
Guest
Madaglan, I did not intend to give the impression that Nominalism was an official teaching of the Church, just that it hadn’t been -condemned- yet. The Church will often wait some time on new ideas to weigh them. Perhaps the Church waited too long in this instance, as it led to the Hussite Church (Utraquist) and the schism of the 16th century. Of course, alternate history is just speculation.
Nominalism was taught by German bishops and scholars both in Saxony where Luther was, and certainly 100 years earlier in Bohemia and Moravia where Hus was. In both cases, that seems to have been the root issue. Nationalism also played a part, in the case of the Czechs, being ruled by German princes, and German bishops who favored Nominalism. In Saxony, being Saxon as oppsed to Italian. It may have been simple for Luther and Melancton, Hus and Jerome, but it wasn’t so uncomplex among their followers or their opponents.
Nominalism was taught by German bishops and scholars both in Saxony where Luther was, and certainly 100 years earlier in Bohemia and Moravia where Hus was. In both cases, that seems to have been the root issue. Nationalism also played a part, in the case of the Czechs, being ruled by German princes, and German bishops who favored Nominalism. In Saxony, being Saxon as oppsed to Italian. It may have been simple for Luther and Melancton, Hus and Jerome, but it wasn’t so uncomplex among their followers or their opponents.