Mary in Islam and Protestantism

  • Thread starter Thread starter oppositeman
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Amen. While I can’t speak for protestants, Lutherans need to do much more regarding the Blessed Virgin. Luther called here the brightest and most noble gem in Christianity, except for Christ. If that is the case, she is the best example to set before our people as the way to be a Christian.

Jon
Thank You Jon, Mary is the most important figure outside of the Trinity, thanks to her yes, Salvation came to humanity. Why not be grateful about that.
 
I didn’t write this article - but in all fairness to the person who did - aren’t you getting a bit picky? the article says “. She is the only woman mentioned by name in the Koran as many as 34 times” - you are saying this is not correct because her name is mentioned in reference to being the mother of Jesus - but her name is still mentioned - it seems to me her name “Mary” appears 34 times.
I don’t believe I’m being picky.

You are correct that “Mary’s” name appears 34 times, but my stand is that when they speak about Jesus, they attach “son of Mary” which is 23 times.

Jesus is the only one in the Quran with this attachment to it.

When the Quran speaks of Moses, it doesn’t attach the title … “son of Jochebed”

When the Quran speaks of Abraham, it doesn’t attache the title … "son of Amathalaah

BTW ~

Moses by name is mentioned in the Quran 176 times

Moses by name is mentioned in the Bible 784 times

Jesus is “The Son Of God”…!!!

Yet Moses is big prophet in Islam.
 
But see that is not right, how can Mary be sinner, if in Job it says that nothing pure can come out of something impure. Or when the Archangel Gabriel, says Hail, full of grace, when your full of something isn’t it common sense that you don’t have space for anything else. Or how about in 2 Corinthians 6:14-15, which states that one cannot be in both sides, of the light and darkness. Remember God molded us in the womb. Don’t you think knowing how great God is that if he did an amazing job with us, that he’s going to one up his mom? Of course he was, because he wanted a mother to be a role model. Yes, Mary needed a savior like you and me, but she gave birth to the Savior. Also, was just as active helping evangelize. When she found out that she will be the Mother of Jesus, what did she do, on Luke 1:39, she went to a region of Judea, to visit and help her cousin Elizabeth. Or how about at the Wedding of Cana, you honestly think that Jesus being God didn’t know that they had ran out of wine, yet he allowed his Mother, to intercede.
Not here to argue, just to provide one Protestant perspective. As Jon said, she can indeed be held up to be a model to believers, I have no problem with that, I think she was/is amazing, truly blesses amongst women. She can be our model to show us to do the will of God, then we are truly mother, brother, sister to Jesus.
 
Not here to argue, just to provide one Protestant perspective. As Jon said, she can indeed be held up to be a model to believers, I have no problem with that, I think she was/is amazing, truly blesses amongst women. She can be our model to show us to do the will of God, then we are truly mother, brother, sister to Jesus.
Lutherans are a peculiar bunch on this. While we teach as doctrine the virgin birth and the Holy Theotokos (the God bearer), we tend to leave the rest to personal piety as we consider it adiaphoron (things indifferent). Hence, some Lutherans, such as myself, who tend to be on the Evangelical Catholic side, accept more readily the Perpetual Virginity, which is confirmed in the confessions, and perhaps other Mariology.
On the Immaculate Conception, I believe that she, God’s grace, was free of sin when she conceived and carried our Lord, but am not tied to this miracle necessarily happening at her conception. Others may think differently.

Jon
 
I don’t believe I’m being picky.

You are correct that “Mary’s” name appears 34 times, but my stand is that when they speak about Jesus, they attach “son of Mary” which is 23 times.

Jesus is the only one in the Quran with this attachment to it.

When the Quran speaks of Moses, it doesn’t attach the title … “son of Jochebed”

When the Quran speaks of Abraham, it doesn’t attache the title … "son of Amathalaah

BTW ~

Moses by name is mentioned in the Quran 176 times

Moses by name is mentioned in the Bible 784 times

Jesus is “The Son Of God”…!!!

Yet Moses is big prophet in Islam.
👍
 
Protestant beliefs about Mary range, but I think it’s important to note that very few if any Protestants hold any disdain for her as they understand her, but many hold disdain for Catholic and Orthodox teachings about her. They reject the Catholic and Orthodox teachings and thus divorce such beliefs about her from her person. They in no way intend to dishonor her, but in fact often consider themselves to be paying her greater honor by speaking the “truth” about her and by not “making her an idol” as they claim Catholics do.

Protestants believe Mary to be a great example of faith and obedience, and dogmatically believe the was a virgin prior to Christ’s birth.

As a rule Protestants don’t believe in the intercession of the saints, or even if they believe the saints pray for us reject praying to them to pray for us, and thus reject devotion to saints. The Blessed Virgin is not exempt from this, and thus for many Protestants Marian devotion is simply not a part of their faith.
No Hail Mary’s, no Rosary, no kneeling before statues (of anyone, except maybe Jesus). They would consider praying to a human being to be at best unnecessary and at worst idolatry.

Protestants generally reject her immaculate conception and sinlessness (believing every human being except for Jesus to have sinned and citing Romans 3)

Protestants often reject her Assumption and Queenship because these things are not recorded or explicitly taught in the Bible.

Many Protestants reject Mary’s perpetual virginity, believing instead that she and St. Joseph consummated their marriage and had natural children after Jesus, believing this to be supported by the Bible verses that speak of the Lord’s brothers and sisters as well as at least one psalm. Many Protestants are unaware that some Church Fathers’ dismissed such arguments against her perpetual virginity and are also unaware that Luther and others believed her to be a virgin her whole life.

Some Lutherans, Anglicans/Episcopalians, or others may not follow the norm and agree with the Catholic position on some Marian dogmas and even venerate saints.

At the point I’m at in my spiritual journey I now more of less accept the Catholic position on all these issues, though “Ever-Virign” still gives me a bit of pause sometimes.
 
Protestant beliefs about Mary range, but I think it’s important to note that very few if any Protestants hold any disdain for her as they understand her, but many hold disdain for Catholic and Orthodox teachings about her. They reject the Catholic and Orthodox teachings and thus divorce such beliefs about her from her person. They in no way intend to dishonor her, but in fact often consider themselves to be paying her greater honor by speaking the “truth” about her and by not “making her an idol” as they claim Catholics do.

Protestants believe Mary to be a great example of faith and obedience, and dogmatically believe the was a virgin prior to Christ’s birth.

As a rule Protestants don’t believe in the intercession of the saints, or even if they believe the saints pray for us reject praying to them to pray for us, and thus reject devotion to saints. The Blessed Virgin is not exempt from this, and thus for many Protestants Marian devotion is simply not a part of their faith.
No Hail Mary’s, no Rosary, no kneeling before statues (of anyone, except maybe Jesus). They would consider praying to a human being to be at best unnecessary and at worst idolatry.

Protestants generally reject her immaculate conception and sinlessness (believing every human being except for Jesus to have sinned and citing Romans 3)

Protestants often reject her Assumption and Queenship because these things are not recorded or explicitly taught in the Bible.

Many Protestants reject Mary’s perpetual virginity, believing instead that she and St. Joseph consummated their marriage and had natural children after Jesus, believing this to be supported by the Bible verses that speak of the Lord’s brothers and sisters as well as at least one psalm. Many Protestants are unaware that some Church Fathers’ dismissed such arguments against her perpetual virginity and are also unaware that Luther and others believed her to be a virgin her whole life.

Some Lutherans, Anglicans/Episcopalians, or others may not follow the norm and agree with the Catholic position on some Marian dogmas and even venerate saints.
You’re about dead on. The only two things I wouldn’t agree on is the kneeling before statues of Jesus (we don’t even do this most of the time) and I think the whole, “Mary had other kids” thing is just another argument because they know Catholics don’t believe this.

It’s one of those things where a Protestant wants to say, “Look, Catholics believe this but Jesus had brothers so Catholicism is wrong!” Besides that, I don’t think there’s any reason to believe that Mary had children after Jesus. I don’t even know why this is an argument besides that reason; it’s only a matter of wanting to prove Catholics wrong and digging deep using 21’st century English translations.

I want to shift this discussion just a tad bit:

I feel Catholics are quick to criticize non-apostolic Christians for their lack of Mary devotion and so quick (as evident by this thread) to praise Muslims for honouring her. Non denominational Christians are normally turned off by statues and Saint devotion, prayers, etc because of their lack of understanding of such things. Muslims are no different in regards to Catholicism, as the whole “Mother of God” thing is far more of an unacceptable saying within Islam. Needless to say Mohammed was strictly against any type of image of him in case people would elevate him in any way.

Muslims aren’t even close to understanding Catholicism as most Protestant Religions are. Let’s be honest guys…
 
some one along this line of comments said something very simple yet very profound - Mary was greeted Hail Mary full of Grace - if you are full of Grace there isn’t any room for sin - this is worth thinking about. Of course you could say that was at this moment in her life and later God withdrew the grace and she became a sinner etc. I believe in my heart what the Catholic Church teaches - not in my head but in my heart. If you believe it in your head then that can create all sorts of problems - but for those who believe it in their hearts it sits very beautifully.
 
That’s good.

Lutherans have a strong esteem for Mary. All Lutheran theologians known to me accept Marys perpetual virginity, Luther agreed that she was protected from sin while she carried Jesus.

I tend to agree on these subjects. Others in my denomination disagree. That’s fine too.
 
It’s one of those things where a Protestant wants to say, “Look, Catholics believe this but Jesus had brothers so Catholicism is wrong!” Besides that, I don’t think there’s any reason to believe that Mary had children after Jesus. I don’t even know why this is an argument besides that reason; it’s only a matter of wanting to prove Catholics wrong and digging deep using 21’st century English translations.
Just from my perspective, I would have to say that I have never got that feeling from fellow protestants, and I certainly don’t believe He had half-siblings for that reason. Not to argue the point, I’m not interested in doing so, but the teaching centers around James and his place in Jerusalem after his conversion as the leader of the church there, not just interpretation of “brothers” as literal.

For me, being raised protestant and never having heard of the teaching of the perpetual virginity of Mary, as I read the scriptures growing up, I always assumed from them that Mary and Joseph were married in all respects, including consummation, so Jesus’ having half-siblings was never a big deal in my thought processes.
 
Most, such as I, don’t believe in the immaculate conception of Mary, nor that she was sinless. That actually lets us identify with her more, because she was in need of a Saviour just as we are/were.
Why does this help you identify with her more? In the Catholic view Mary needed a Saviour just as we do. What she experienced first all Christians will eventually experience. She like all other descendants of Adam had to be redeemed through Christ. All believers in Christ are delivered by his grace from the sin of Adam and all believers in Christ will be raised bodily from the dead. We believe Mary who was the first Christian disciple, the first to profess belief in Christ as revealed by an angel was through Christ’s grace the first Christian to be raised bodily and assumed into heaven and the first to be totally free from Adam’s sin i.e. conceived without sin. These special privileges we believe God gave to Mary are related to the graces of discipleship given through Christ. These privileges all disciples of Jesus will receive. We are delivered from original sin through baptism. We believe Mary was the first to receive the grace of Christ’s redemption from the time of her conception (immaculate conception). The gift of freedom from original sin is a gift to all disciples but the first disciple received it first. Again the bodily Assumption of Mary if understood as being bodily taken into heaven after her death is something that will be given to all Christians eventually. As a former Protestant it was helpful for me to see the two doctrines of the Assumption and Immaculate Conception in the trajectory of discipleship. Catholics recognize the grace given by God to disciples of his Son. Mary is the ultimate disciple and this view completely jives with the Biblical account of her famous words “Be it done according to your word”.
 
Amen. While I can’t speak for protestants, Lutherans need to do much more regarding the Blessed Virgin. Luther called here the brightest and most noble gem in Christianity, except for Christ. If that is the case, she is the best example to set before our people as the way to be a Christian.

Jon
👍
 
Why does this help you identify with her more?
Because truly all humans have sinned and fallen short of the glory of God. All humans throughout all time, including Mary. In this sense, it makes more logical connection that we too are called Jesus’ mother in the respect of following His will; remember He proclaimed that those who follow His will are His sisters, brothers, mothers. Notice He never said father. Mary is placed on the same playing-field as us, giving us a human, therefore sinner, model that we can be like; in other words, even though we are sinners we too can be as Mary in her faith. However, we can’t be immaculately conceived.
 
Mary is placed on the same playing-field as us.
Ha, not exactly, when you or any of us, in fact give supernatural birth to the Word of God, then perhaps we, as in each one of us may re-think our place in the order of Grace. And this goes for all of Gods Saints also. They are lasting reminders and should be venerated and remembered but not worshipped. They are Gods holy family in the communion of Saints. The same communion we now seek of our earthy journey.
 
Mark 3:35 For whosoever shall do the will of God, the same is my brother, and my sister, and mother.

It’s an awesome verse to contemplate, along with all the others of course.
 
I can truly say I’ve never heard Mary disparaged in a Protestant service, and I’ve been to many different denominations’ services. Mary is held up to be blessed, and as a role model of faith. Jesus declares we can have faith akin to the faith of His Mother, and in fact says that those who do His will are His sister, brother, mother.

Protestants believe the virgin Mary was a young lady of faith, who trusted in God above and beyond those around her. Most, such as I, don’t believe in the immaculate conception of Mary, nor that she was sinless. That actually lets us identify with her more, because she was in need of a Saviour just as we are/were. She is indeed seen as the “God-bearer” because we obviously agree Jesus is God the Son. Most of us don’t feel that consummating her marriage to Joseph would be a sin, in fact, consummation is a hallmark of true marriage. So, in short, to us, saying Mary and Joseph consummated their marriage, even perhaps having children together, and that she needed a Saviour, are not negative things in the least and we mean no disrespect. Quite the opposite.

I would point out something from protestant circles that those of you from the RC perspective may not see; the protestants I’ve heard discuss the idea of Mary in Islam are not looking favorably on Roman Catholics and Muslims bonding over Mary, in fact they use it to further attempt to show the dangers of venerating Mary. I believe part of the problem, from their perspective, is that it continues to give the veneer of a link from Christianity to Islam.
I think of it something like in Ezequiel 44.

I, the Lord God of Israel, came through this gate, so it must remain closed forever! No one must ever use it.

I think of it like that with the Blessed Virgin Mary, that God wouldn’t share Mary with Joseph. To think Mary had offspring first with God then with Joseph goes against everything I believe. That, to me, wouldn’t make sense.

We believe in the perpetual virginity of Mary.

Joseph was there to give Jesus an earthly father. Joseph and Mary were never intimate with each other.

We believe Mary was the daughter of God the Father, the mother of Jesus, and spouse of the Holy Spirit. She is the temple, and tabernacle of the Trinity. God would never allow anyone with that kind of a relationship to be impure or sinful.

If Mary had relations with Joseph, it would make her unfaithful to her real spouse, the Holy Spirit, and would be wrong to falsely accuse her of something she didn’t do.

Further, she was not sinful. Jesus came from a pure, immaculate vessel, Mary. She was pure her entire life!

As to Catholics’ relationship with Mary, we venerate and honor her, as I believe you already know. We believe that, at the cross, Christ offered his body, blood, soul and divinity for us but his own mother. We believe she became our spiritual mother, at the cross. Jesus went from referring to her as “woman” and referred to her as John’s mother. We, Catholics, interpret this to mean at that moment, he gave us Mary, our spiritual mother.

Scripture commands us to honor our Father and Mother, be it God the Father, our earthly parents, or Mary, our spiritual mother.

She has been intervening on our behalf since the Wedding at Cana!
 
Ha, not exactly, when you or any of us, in fact give supernatural birth to the Word of God, then perhaps we, as in each one of us may re-think our place in the order of Grace. And this goes for all of Gods Saints also. They are lasting reminders and should be venerated and remembered but not worshipped. They are Gods holy family in the communion of Saints. The same communion we now seek of our earthy journey.
We Catholics, likewise, believe it would be sinful to worship Mary. We honor her, as the Mother of God, the spouse of the Holy Spirit, and the daughter of God the Father.

When we say the Hail Mary, we are, for the most part, reciting scripture! “Hail Full of Grace, the Lord is with you” is taken directly from the Bible, and was God’s own words to his most perfect creation.

Then, “Blessed is the fruit of thy womb”…is Elizabeth’s words to Mary, likewise, reciting scripture.

Mary responded…“My soul proclaims the greatness of the Lord…ALL generations shall call me blessed for the Almighty has done great things for me…”

(All generations except of a few faiths which refuse to),

We, Catholics, call her “Blessed”, but the Protestants don’t seem to want to do that, to honor her in any way. They seem to want to try to diminish her role, ignore her.

We are to call her blessed and honor her!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top