Mary - sinner - Romans 3?

  • Thread starter Thread starter joe370
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Originally Posted by RevG
16 All Scripture is breathed out by God and profitable for teaching, for reproof, for correction, and for training in righteousness, 17that the man of God may be competent, equipped for every good work. (ESV)
One more time…it does not read:

ONLY Scripture is breathed out by God and profitable for teaching, for reproof, for correction, and for training in righteousness, 17that the man of God may be competent, equipped for every good work

So kindly tell us where in the above it says scripture is the final authority? It says nothing of the sort at all. It is pure conjecture on your part due to a profound misinterpretation.
All scripture…not traditions of the catholic church.
Ahhhhh…scripture is part of the Apostolic Traditions which are part of the Catholic Church. The NT canon is a Tradition you adhere to you,thus you evidently accept Catholic Traditions,whether you care to admit it or not.
If you take issue with this take it up with God. He wrote the Bible not the catholic church, He preserved the Bible. He said the Bible (Scripture) is God breathed, and that through it we may be equipped for every good work.
Christ founded His church,he did not Incarnate as man to write a Bible and say it is the final authority.And no God did not write the Bible,men wrote it through his inspiration.
 
I will this on a few other threads…

This fall, 70% of PBS stations will air 4 episodes of Fr. Robert Barron’s Catholicism Project. There are 10 DVD’s for sale at Wordonfire.org.

He goes from the martyrdom of early Christians to the Church’s scandals – the Crusades, Inquisition, and slavery. The program speaks in every day language. Its filmed sites include many parts of the world, including India and South America.

Hopefully, the fundamentalists who question Mary or our way of relating to Sacred Scripture be able and desiring to watch this series, and gain some understanding of our faith.
 
Wow, this is a wonderful conversion story from Deacon Alex Jones. Thanks for posting this.
I admire the guts of Deacon Jones for leaving his congregation, giving up everything for the truth. This difficult to imitate life is a testament that evangelicals who already are making a living from their congregations will really have a hard time accepting the truth. I liked how he understood the meaning of being a Catholic aspiring for holiness instead of asking for material things to posses. A salute to his acceptance of becoming a Deacon instead of his desire to be a priest.

To Deacon Alex Jones, you have my respect and thank you for this wonderful presentation of your conversion.
 
One more time…it does not read:

ONLY Scripture is breathed out by God and profitable for teaching, for reproof, for correction, and for training in righteousness, 17that the man of God may be competent, equipped for every good work

So kindly tell us where in the above it says scripture is the final authority? It says nothing of the sort at all. It is pure conjecture on your part due to a profound misinterpretation.
The text says Scripture, the word tradition or oral tradition is not present there is it? Scripture is God breathed and profitable. Maybe I am over thinking this but God didn’t mention any other authority by which to teach, correct and equip.
Ahhhhh…scripture is part of the Apostolic Traditions which are part of the Catholic Church. The NT canon is a Tradition you adhere to you,thus you evidently accept Catholic Traditions,whether you care to admit it or not.
I will start by explaining that Apostolic Successionism is a pipe dream. There is no historical evidence to show succession of an unbroken line. There is historical evidence to show that the Catholic Church had 3 popes at one time in three different cities and at other times had 2 popes at the same time. Which of these was the true pope or were they all in the line of unbroken succession?

The NT canon was not adopted by the Roman Catholic Church, but by the general agreement of Christian churches that these were the authoritative books. These were the 66 books that were in frequent use and held to be inspired.
Christ founded His church,he did not Incarnate as man to write a Bible and say it is the final authority.And no God did not write the Bible,men wrote it through his inspiration.
You are correct God did not pen the Bible, but He is the author. He used what is called plenary inspiration for the majority of the Bible and mechanical dictation for some parts, such as the Decalogue.
Jesus founded the Church with Himself as the foundation and cornerstone. he gave us the Scriptures to know how to relate to a holy God. Jesus explained to the disciples after His resurrection about Himself from the Law the Prophets and the Psalms. This covers the entirety of the Old Testament, I guess he forgot to mention that He taught tradition there too.
 
The above is false and a contradiction to God. Did not Jesus pick 12 men to guide and lead His church under the Holy Spirit as promised? If God found them useless,then why bother to assign them an office?
So let me see if I understand you properly. Which part is the contradiction for you?
Do you not have the Holy Spirit to guide you?
Do you think that God only gave the Holy Spirit to the apostles?
Do you think that the Holy Spirit is unable or unwilling to lead a person down the path of righteousness?
Do you think that your magisterium is a modern day apostle?

I never called the apostles useless, that would be you that said that in your response. I will seek to respond to this further when I understand where exactly you object.
 
Exactly. He does not understand that Catholicism is based on the life, death and resurrection of Jesus Christ through Oral Tradition, given us by actual witnesses…the apostles.

Studying Scripture through Apostolic succession vs the individual ends up being in different places…we all believe in Christ, but we relate to Him as a church, not individual.
the problem with that is that salvation has to be obtain by the individual. The church cannot get you saved, or to use a different term, it cannot get you into heaven. Isnt salvation the real issue here, how to get souls out of line for hell and into heaven? We must relate to Jesus individually without forsaking the gathering of the saints, which is for edification.
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nicea325
One more time…it does not read:
ONLY Scripture is breathed out by God and profitable for teaching, for reproof, for correction, and for training in righteousness, 17that the man of God may be competent, equipped for every good work
So kindly tell us where in the above it says scripture is the final authority? It says nothing of the sort at all. It is pure conjecture on your part due to a profound misinterpretation.
The text says Scripture, the word tradition or oral tradition is not present there is it? Scripture is God breathed and profitable. Maybe I am over thinking this but God didn’t mention any other authority by which to teach, correct and equip.
And the word…ONLY is not present there…is it?
Quote:
Ahhhhh…scripture is part of the Apostolic Traditions which are part of the Catholic Church. The NT canon is a Tradition you adhere to you,thus you evidently accept Catholic Traditions,whether you care to admit it or not.
I will start by explaining that Apostolic Successionism is a pipe dream. There is no historical evidence to show succession of an unbroken line. There is historical evidence to show that the Catholic Church had 3 popes at one time in three different cities and at other times had 2 popes at the same time. Which of these was the true pope or were they all in the line of unbroken succession?
Nice divergence there Rev G. No where did the discussion involve Apostolic Succession…a clear sign you cannot ADMIT the NT canon is Apostolic Traditions. Apostolic Succession is a pipe dream? No more of a pipe dream than your lack of empirical historical evidence to debunk it-eh?
The NT canon was not adopted by the Roman Catholic Church, but by the general agreement of Christian churches that these were the authoritative books. These were the 66 books that were in frequent use and held to be inspired.
Oh dear! These are the type of responses one hears from people who have the slighest idea of the history of the bibical canon. The 66 books were in frequents use and inspired? Yes as well as the 7 books Protestants later rejected. Go read and learn history my friend.
Quote:
Christ founded His church,he did not Incarnate as man to write a Bible and say it is the final authority.And no God did not write the Bible,men wrote it through his inspiration.
You are correct God did not pen the Bible, but He is the author. He used what is called plenary inspiration for the majority of the Bible and mechanical dictation for some parts, such as the Decalogue.
Jesus founded the Church with Himself as the foundation and cornerstone. he gave us the Scriptures to know how to relate to a holy God. Jesus explained to the disciples after His resurrection about Himself from the Law the Prophets and the Psalms. This covers the entirety of the Old Testament, I guess he forgot to mention that He taught tradition there too.
U-huh…and come full cirlce…He founded His Church and no where teaches the Bible-Alone is the final authority.
 
The text says Scripture, the word tradition or oral tradition is not present there is it? Scripture is God breathed and profitable. Maybe I am over thinking this but God didn’t mention any other authority by which to teach, correct and equip.

I will start by explaining that Apostolic Successionism is a pipe dream. There is no historical evidence to show succession of an unbroken line. There is historical evidence to show that the Catholic Church had 3 popes at one time in three different cities and at other times had 2 popes at the same time. Which of these was the true pope or were they all in the line of unbroken succession?

The NT canon was not adopted by the Roman Catholic Church, but by the general agreement of Christian churches that these were the authoritative books. These were the 66 books that were in frequent use and held to be inspired.

You are correct God did not pen the Bible, but He is the author. He used what is called plenary inspiration for the majority of the Bible and mechanical dictation for some parts, such as the Decalogue.
Jesus founded the Church with Himself as the foundation and cornerstone. he gave us the Scriptures to know how to relate to a holy God. Jesus explained to the disciples after His resurrection about Himself from the Law the Prophets and the Psalms. This covers the entirety of the Old Testament, I guess he forgot to mention that He taught tradition there too.
Date, Time and Names of that Christian Church Reverend.👍
 
the problem with that is that salvation has to be obtain by the individual. The church cannot get you saved, or to use a different term, it cannot get you into heaven. Isnt salvation the real issue here, how to get souls out of line for hell and into heaven? **We must relate to Jesus individually **without forsaking the gathering of the saints, which is for edification.
In your opinion and in your understanding however I believe the OHCAC teaches individually and corporately since the Body of Christ is the Church and not acknowledge the corporate Christ is to deny Christ.👍
 
The text says Scripture, the word tradition or oral tradition is not present there is it? Scripture is God breathed and profitable. Maybe I am over thinking this but God didn’t mention any other authority by which to teach, correct and equip.
The text doesn’t say only
The text doesn’t say sufficient
The text doesn’t tell us what scripture is
It just says that the inspired writings are useful for teaching

Elsewhere St Paul says to hold onto tradition whether by
(1) word of mouth or (2) by our epistle.
2 not 1. Do you hold onto the word of mouth tradition?

If the Holy Spirit can protect written tradition from error why not oral?
The NT canon was not adopted by the Roman Catholic Church, but by the general agreement of Christian churches that these were the authoritative books. These were the 66 books that were in frequent use and held to be inspired.
Do you mean the early Christians went outside the Bible :eek:
And when did they generally agree that they were authoritative. Year???

Actually the Catholic Council of Rome in 382 AD confirmed a 72 book canon
This was confirmed at council after council
-The council of Hippo (393 AD)
-The council of Carthage (397)
-The council of Carthage (419)
-The council of Nicaea II (787)
-The council of Florence (1441)
-The council of Trent (1545-1563)
-Vatican council I (1869-1870)
-Vatican council II (1962-1965) for example

Some in the early Church used Hermas frequently
Some didn’t use Revelation frequently in fact at all
Many Church fathers quoted the Deuterocanon
The Church settled the issue once and for all
Though she had to turn to her oral tradition to work out the Canon
Yep to get the Bible we had to go outside the Bible
If it works for the Canon why not for the Immaculate Conception?
Jesus founded the Church with Himself as the foundation and cornerstone. he gave us the Scriptures to know how to relate to a holy God. Jesus explained to the disciples after His resurrection about Himself from the Law the Prophets and the Psalms. This covers the entirety of the Old Testament, I guess he forgot to mention that He taught tradition there too.
And did Jesus ever tell the disciple what books make up the law, psalms and prophets?
For example is Baruch a prophet? Catholic, Orthodox and some Jews would say so.

Jesus spoke of the wisdom of Solomon. And where can we read this wisdom…

“Do you expect me to explain the purposes and plans of God? The book of Wisdom gives an answer to your foolish questions… and in the same place ‘In wisdom and simplicity of heart seek God.’ You will perhaps deny the authority of this book…” (St Jerome against the Pelagians)

Romans 11:34
34 “Who has known the mind of the Lord? Or who has been his counselor?”

Wisdom 9:13
For what man knows God’s counsel, or who can conceive what our LORD intends?

Matthew 27:41-43
41In the same way the chief priests, the teachers of the law and the elders mocked him. 42 “He saved others,” they said, "but he can’t save himself! He’s the King of Israel! Let him come down now from the cross, and we will believe in him. 43 He trusts in God.Let God rescue him now if he wants him, for he said, ‘I am the Son of God.’ "

Wisdom 2:15-18
15 Because his life is not like other men’s, and different are his ways. 16 He judges us debased; he holds aloof from our paths as from things impure. He calls blest the destiny of the just and boasts that God is his Father. 17 Let us see whether his words be true; let us find out what will happen to him. 18 For if the just one be the son of God, he will defend him and deliver him from the hand of his foes. 19 With revilement and torture let us put him to the test that we may have proof of his gentleness and try his patience. 20 Let us condemn him to a shameful death; for according to his own words, God will take care of him." 21 These were their thoughts, but they erred; for their wickedness blinded them, 22 And they knew not the hidden counsels of God; neither did they count on a recompense of holiness nor discern the innocent souls’ reward.
 
RevG…you are understanding us through a filter and you are not connecting Tradition to the Bible quotes folks here are sharing with you.

Yes, the Apostolic succession can be proven…there is a post out there I saw recently that listed all the bishops of Rome from the beginning…the term Vicar of Christ came later.

But again…the pope is like a baseball umpire…as the Catholicism program will be airing,…check…I am pretty sure it starts tonight…The papacy is the sign of unity and the representative of all of us united with Christ.

This doesn’t mean however, that every pope was good. In time, as the world became more complex within Christian nations, the Church has had to update itself to the times. That does not mean it is false. It means Christ chose human beings to administrate His church.
 
So let me see if I understand you properly. Which part is the contradiction for you?
Do you not have the Holy Spirit to guide you?
Do you think that God only gave the Holy Spirit to the apostles?
Do you think that the Holy Spirit is unable or unwilling to lead a person down the path of righteousness?
Do you think that your magisterium is a modern day apostle?

I never called the apostles useless, that would be you that said that in your response. I will seek to respond to this further when I understand where exactly you object.
Read what you said:

*Quote:
Originally Posted by RevG
See there is the difference between me and you, I rely on the Holy Spirit of God to guide me on the path of righteousness, you seem to rely on some man appointed by the church. correct me if I am wrong. I look forward to the candid responses to this. *

So in other words, you alone and no Catholic relies on the Holy Spirit? We as Catholics rely on appointed men by the church? That is right! No different than you who attends some church were I expect the pastor to rely on the HS as well?

So why the double standards there-eh?
 
The text says Scripture, the word tradition or oral tradition is not present there is it? Scripture is God breathed and profitable. Maybe I am over thinking this but God didn’t mention any other authority by which to teach, correct and equip.

I will start by explaining that Apostolic Successionism is a pipe dream. There is no historical evidence to show succession of an unbroken line. There is historical evidence to show that the Catholic Church had 3 popes at one time in three different cities and at other times had 2 popes at the same time. Which of these was the true pope or were they all in the line of unbroken succession?

The NT canon was not adopted by the Roman Catholic Church, but by the general agreement of Christian churches that these were the authoritative books. These were the 66 books that were in frequent use and held to be inspired.

You are correct God did not pen the Bible, but He is the author. He used what is called plenary inspiration for the majority of the Bible and mechanical dictation for some parts, such as the Decalogue.
Jesus founded the Church with Himself as the foundation and cornerstone. he gave us the Scriptures to know how to relate to a holy God. Jesus explained to the disciples after His resurrection about Himself from the Law the Prophets and the Psalms. This covers the entirety of the Old Testament, I guess he forgot to mention that He taught tradition there too.
Scripture is profitable. This passage does not declare that only Scripture is profitable and in fact Scripture says that good works are profitable and that there are things other than Scripture that can equip. For you to say that this passage says Scripture does not stand up with what God says. Someone aint tellin the truth here?

Titus 3:8
This is a faithful saying, and these things I will that thou affirm constantly, that they which have believed in God might be careful to maintain good works. These things are good and profitable unto men.

Ephesians

11And he gave some, apostles; and some, prophets; and some, evangelists; and some, pastors and teachers; to equip the saints for the work of ministry, for building up the body of Christ,
 
RevG, perhaps all have not sinned? After all there are scriptural exceptions regarding the word all:

Did all the world go after Christ in the following verse?

“… the whole world has gone after him” John 12:19

Was all Judea, or all Jerusalem, baptized in the Jordan?

All of Judea, including all the people of Jerusalem, went out to see and hear John. And when they confessed their sins, he baptized them in the Jordan River.” Mark

Did Caesar tax the people from India, China, and South America in the following verse? Matthew 2:3

“And it came to pass in those days, that there went out a decree from Caesar Augustus, that all the world should be taxed.” Luke 2:1

“When Herod the king heard this, he was troubled, and all Jerusalem with him”

That would be every single person in Jerusalem** if “all” means all inclusive.**

What about: “ … Then all the disciples left him [Jesus] and fled.” Matthew 26:56

John followed Christ all the way to the cross.

Did the whole world lieth in the wicked one in the following verse?

“Ye are of God, little children”, and the whole world lieth in the wicked one”. 1 John 5:19

Romans 15: “I myself am satisfied about you, my brethren, that you yourselves are full of goodness, filled with all knowledge, and able to instruct one another.”

Of course only God has “all” knowledge.

If “all” in the preceding verses allow for exceptions then surely “all” in Romans 3:23 can allow for exceptions too - yes, no, maybe?

Your thoughts friend?
 
Originally Posted by RevG - Scripture is God breathed and profitable…
From the following you believe that scripture is the Christians only authority - right:

All Scripture is God-breathed and is useful for teaching, rebuking, correcting and training in righteousness, so that the servant of God may be thoroughly equipped for every good work.

James tells us: Let perseverance finish its work so that you may be mature and complete, not lacking anything.

According to James, all one needs is perseverance to be made complete, lacking nothing. Was James right about perseverance? Where does the bible suggest that scripture makes a Christian complete, not lacking anything?
I will start by explaining that Apostolic Successionism is a pipe dream.
Surely you admit that the NT recognizes AS. Paul is quite clear on the need of Apostolic Succession as he confirms by saying to Titus: "For this cause I left thee in Crete, that thou shouldest set in order the things that are wanting, and shouldest ordain presbyters in every city, as I also appointed thee…(Titus 1:5 - 1 Tim. 4:14)

Paul ordained Titus and Titus was told to ordain other presbyters in every city just as Paul had ordained him. That is an example of apostolic succession to the third generation.

How would the first Christians know, with certainty, how to determine which claimant, (among the many competing new sects that cropped up) - was in fact a leader in the true Church founded by Christ? Easy. They simply traced the apostolic succession of the claimants to verify that their teachings and their teachers came down from the apostles and their legitimate successors?
There is no historical evidence to show succession of an unbroken line.
No?

Clement I (1st century)

'Through countryside and city [the apostles] preached, and they appointed their earliest converts, testing them by the Spirit,** to be the bishops and deacons of future** believers. Nor was this a novelty, for bishops and deacons had been written about a long time earlier’ Our apostles knew through our Lord Jesus Christ that there would be strife for the office of bishop. For this reason, therefore, having received perfect foreknowledge, they appointed those who have already been mentioned and afterwards added the further provision that, if they should die, other approved men should succeed to their ministry.'

Irenaeus of Lyons (202 A. D.)

‘It is possible, then, for everyone in every church, who may wish to know the truth, to contemplate the Tradition of the Apostles which has been made known to us throughout the whole world. And we are in a position to enumerate those who were instituted bishops by the apostles and their successors down to our own times, men who neither knew nor taught anything like what these heretics rave about’.

‘But since it would be too long to enumerate in such as volume as’ this the’ successions’ of’ all the churches, we shall confound all those who, in whatever manner, whether through self-satisfaction or vainglory, or through blindness and wicked opinion, assemble other than where it is proper, by pointing out here the successions of the bishops of the greatest and most ancient church known to all, founded and organized at Rome by the two most glorious Apostles, Peter and Paul ’ that church which has the Tradition and the with which comes down to us after having been announced to men by the apostles. For with this Church, because if its superior origin, all churches must agree, that is, all the faithful in the whole world. And it is in her that the faithful everywhere have maintained the Apostolic Tradition’.

‘It is incumbent to obey the presbyters who are in the Church ’ those who, as I have shown, possess the succession from the apostles; those who, together with the succession of the episcopate, have received the infallible charism of truth, according to the good pleasure of the Father. But [it is also incumbent] to hold in suspicion others who depart from the primitive succession, and assemble themselves together in any place whatsoever, either as heretics of perverse minds, or as schismatics puffed up and self-pleasing, or again as hypocrites, acting thus for the sake of lucre and vainglory. For all these have fallen from the truth’ (ibid., 4:26:2)’ ‘The true knowledge is the doctrine of the apostles, and the ancient organization of the Church throughout the whole world, and the manifestation of the body of Christ **according to the succession of bishops, by which succession the bishops have handed down the Church which is found everywhere’.
** Cyprian of Carthage, d. 258 A. D.

‘The Church is one, and as she is one, cannot be both within and without. For if she is with [the heretic] Novatian, she was not with [Pope] Cornelius. But if she was with Cornelius, who succeeded the bishop [of Rome], Fabian**, by lawful ordination**, and whom, beside the honor of the priesthood, the Lord glorified also with martyrdom, Novatian is not in the Church**; nor can he be reckoned as a bishop, who, succeeding to no one, and despising the evangelical and apostolic tradition,** sprang from himself. For he who has not been ordained in the Church can neither have nor hold to the Church in any way’(Letters ‘69[75]:3 [253 A. D.]).’’
 
From the following you believe that scripture is the Christians only authority - right:

All Scripture is God-breathed and is useful for teaching, rebuking, correcting and training in righteousness, so that the servant of God may be thoroughly equipped for every good work.

James tells us: Let perseverance finish its work so that you may be mature and complete, not lacking anything.

According to James, all one needs is perseverance to be made complete, lacking nothing. Was James right about perseverance? Where does the bible suggest that scripture makes a Christian complete, not lacking anything?

Surely you admit that the NT recognizes AS. Paul is quite clear on the need of Apostolic Succession as he confirms by saying to Titus: "For this cause I left thee in Crete, that thou shouldest set in order the things that are wanting, and shouldest ordain presbyters in every city, as I also appointed thee…(Titus 1:5 - 1 Tim. 4:14)

Paul ordained Titus and Titus was told to ordain other presbyters in every city just as Paul had ordained him. That is an example of apostolic succession to the third generation.

How would the first Christians know, with certainty, how to determine which claimant, (among the many competing new sects that cropped up) - was in fact a leader in the true Church founded by Christ? Easy. They simply traced the apostolic succession of the claimants to verify that their teachings and their teachers came down from the apostles and their legitimate successors?

No?

Clement I (1st century)

'Through countryside and city [the apostles] preached, and they appointed their earliest converts, testing them by the Spirit,** to be the bishops and deacons of future** believers. Nor was this a novelty, for bishops and deacons had been written about a long time earlier’ Our apostles knew through our Lord Jesus Christ that there would be strife for the office of bishop. For this reason, therefore, having received perfect foreknowledge, they appointed those who have already been mentioned and afterwards added the further provision that, if they should die, other approved men should succeed to their ministry.'

Irenaeus of Lyons (202 A. D.)

‘It is possible, then, for everyone in every church, who may wish to know the truth, to contemplate the Tradition of the Apostles which has been made known to us throughout the whole world. And we are in a position to enumerate those who were instituted bishops by the apostles and their successors down to our own times, men who neither knew nor taught anything like what these heretics rave about’.

‘But since it would be too long to enumerate in such as volume as’ this the’ successions’ of’ all the churches, we shall confound all those who, in whatever manner, whether through self-satisfaction or vainglory, or through blindness and wicked opinion, assemble other than where it is proper, by pointing out here the successions of the bishops of the greatest and most ancient church known to all, founded and organized at Rome by the two most glorious Apostles, Peter and Paul ’ that church which has the Tradition and the with which comes down to us after having been announced to men by the apostles. For with this Church, because if its superior origin, all churches must agree, that is, all the faithful in the whole world. And it is in her that the faithful everywhere have maintained the Apostolic Tradition’.

‘It is incumbent to obey the presbyters who are in the Church ’ those who, as I have shown, possess the succession from the apostles; those who, together with the succession of the episcopate, have received the infallible charism of truth, according to the good pleasure of the Father. But [it is also incumbent] to hold in suspicion others who depart from the primitive succession, and assemble themselves together in any place whatsoever, either as heretics of perverse minds, or as schismatics puffed up and self-pleasing, or again as hypocrites, acting thus for the sake of lucre and vainglory. For all these have fallen from the truth’ (ibid., 4:26:2)’ ‘The true knowledge is the doctrine of the apostles, and the ancient organization of the Church throughout the whole world, and the manifestation of the body of Christ **according to the succession of bishops, by which succession the bishops have handed down the Church which is found everywhere’.
** Cyprian of Carthage, d. 258 A. D.

‘The Church is one, and as she is one, cannot be both within and without. For if she is with [the heretic] Novatian, she was not with [Pope] Cornelius. But if she was with Cornelius, who succeeded the bishop [of Rome], Fabian**, by lawful ordination**, and whom, beside the honor of the priesthood, the Lord glorified also with martyrdom, Novatian is not in the Church**; nor can he be reckoned as a bishop, who, succeeding to no one, and despising the evangelical and apostolic tradition,** sprang from himself. For he who has not been ordained in the Church can neither have nor hold to the Church in any way’(Letters ‘69[75]:3 [253 A. D.]).’’
Has anyone seen my dear friend RevG, can you tell me where he’s gone,

Can you tell me where he’s gone?
He freed a lot of people,
But it seems the good they die young.
You know, I just looked around and he’s gone.
 
Has anyone seen my dear friend RevG, can you tell me where he’s gone,

Can you tell me where he’s gone?
He freed a lot of people,
But it seems the good they die young.
You know, I just looked around and he’s gone.
No I was hoping he would stick around and hopefully clear up his misconceptions about the Church. He seemed to be a sincere person.
 
So let me see if I understand you properly. Which part is the contradiction for you?
Do you not have the Holy Spirit to guide you?
This is the fundamental flaw in your position that you remain in complete denial about. You and I have the same Scripture to refer to. Why is it that the Holy Spirit would guide me in one way and you in a diametrically opposite way?

Does he just have a curious sense of humour? Is he mischievous? Surely not!
Are there two Holy Spirits, one guiding you and one guiding me?
How do YOU explain this?

And, of course, you have previously ignored any comment on the fact that this sort of disagreement arose almost immediately after Sola Scriptura came to be. (Remember Luther, Calvin, Zwingli…?)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top