Mary, the ark of the new covenant

  • Thread starter Thread starter mark_a
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
M

mark_a

Guest
Is there a time frame in which the view of Mary as the ark of the new covenant was taught to the whole Church? Was it from the beginning?

Obviously Luke thought she was.
 
Is there a time frame in which the view of Mary as the ark of the new covenant was taught to the whole Church? Was it from the beginning?
Obviously Luke thought she was.
I know Tim Staples’ tapes on the Blessed Mother talk in depth about this topic. I’ve listened to them several times but I’m terrible at remembering dates. He talks a lot about the early Church Fathers ideas on this, but also uses much Scripture to support the idea. Very interesting to hear all of the NT comparrisons that identify Mary as the NT ark (dancing before the Ark, Holy Spirit overshadowing the Ark, the 3 months that Mary stays in Elizabeth’s house, etc). I will try to listen to the part of the tapes that talk about Mary as the NT Ark and get some dates to go with this.👍
 
Is there a time frame in which the view of Mary as the ark of the new covenant was taught to the whole Church? Was it from the beginning?

Obviously Luke thought she was.
I murdered the op.

It should have read:

What is the time frame in which the view of Mary as the ark of the new covenant was taught to the whole Church? Was it from the beginning?

Obviously Luke thought she was.
 
This article should answer your question.
( zuserver2.star.ucl.ac.uk/~vgg/rc/aplgtc/hahn/m4/ma.html )
Here’s just a short clip from it:

Quote
*Now, this isn’t Noah’s ark, this is the Ark of the Covenant. We’ll get a little bit more into the background in just a minute, but why the Ark of the Covenant, and this is an ancient liturgical tradition. These are texts that have been included in the liturgy of the Assumption as far back as we can trace it, and this is like 7th Century, 6th Century. *
Unquote

Nita
 
This article should answer your question.
( zuserver2.star.ucl.ac.uk/~vgg/rc/aplgtc/hahn/m4/ma.html )
Here’s just a short clip from it:

Quote
*Now, this isn’t Noah’s ark, this is the Ark of the Covenant. We’ll get a little bit more into the background in just a minute, but why the Ark of the Covenant, and this is an ancient liturgical tradition. These are texts that have been included in the liturgy of the Assumption as far back as we can trace it, and this is like 7th Century, 6th Century. *
Unquote

Nita
A good website for sure, but Ephraim called her an Ark explicitly around 370 A.D. in a hymn which would have been said at Mass.

Earlier Fathers connected the Ark typology to a number of items, including Jesus human body and also the church itself. Of course we want to avoid the former because it promotes the idea that Jesus’ human body is a contained that holds God rather than being God Himself.
 
This article should answer your question.
( zuserver2.star.ucl.ac.uk/~vgg/rc/aplgtc/hahn/m4/ma.html )
Here’s just a short clip from it:

Quote
*Now, this isn’t Noah’s ark, this is the Ark of the Covenant. We’ll get a little bit more into the background in just a minute, but why the Ark of the Covenant, and this is an ancient liturgical tradition. These are texts that have been included in the liturgy of the Assumption as far back as we can trace it, and this is like 7th Century, 6th Century. *
Unquote

Nita
That’s a great article. Thanks so much.
 
I did find where Tim Staples said that St. Hippolytus (I think) wrote in a letter that Mary was the Ark of the Covenant in 200 AD. I thought there were some more references to the Church Fathers dealing with Mary as the Ark, but I struggled finding them on the tape.:o He discusses a lot on the OT events dealing with the Ark and how they coincide with the NT fulfillment of the Ark, Mary. The other posters also give some good examples from the ECF.👍
 
FYI,

“The Gospel Truth about Mary” CDs by Catholic Answers apologist Tim Staples may be purchased here, and his CD set “All Generations Shall Call Me Blessed” is available here.

Mane Nobiscum Domine,
Ferdinand Mary
 
Ferdinand Mary FYI,
“The Gospel Truth about Mary” CDs by Catholic Answers apologist Tim Staples may be purchased here, and his CD set “All Generations Shall Call Me Blessed” is available here.
Mane Nobiscum Domine,
Ferdinand Mary
The latter set of tapes are the ones that I have, and they are awesome. Tim discusses almost all of the topics dealing with Mary, using a lot of Scripture and refers to the ECF about many of the topics covered.👍
 
I did find where Tim Staples said that St. Hippolytus (I think) wrote in a letter that Mary was the Ark of the Covenant in 200 AD. I thought there were some more references to the Church Fathers dealing with Mary as the Ark, but I struggled finding them on the tape.:o He discusses a lot on the OT events dealing with the Ark and how they coincide with the NT fulfillment of the Ark, Mary. The other posters also give some good examples from the ECF.👍
The often quoted Hippolytus mentioning Mary is the Ark of the Covenant is a common error which has been made by many Catholic apologists and theologians, including Steve Ray, Scott Hahn, etc. I love them all, but when you study Hippolytus, most of his writings mention that Jesus’ physical body is the Ark, and not Mary.

Read the quote:
“At that time, the Savior coming from the Virgin, the Ark, brought forth His own Body into the world from that Ark, which was gilded with pure gold within by the Word, and without by the Holy Ghost; so that the truth was shown forth, and the Ark was manifested…And the Savior came into the world bearing the incorruptible Ark, that is to say His own body” ~Hippolytus

I am at work, so I don’t have the other Hippolytus-Ark quotes off hand. Regardless, Hippolytus did NOT believe Mary was the new Ark of the Covenant (even though she is 😃 )
 
I am at work, so I don’t have the other Hippolytus-Ark quotes off hand. Regardless, Hippolytus did NOT believe Mary was the new Ark of the Covenant (even though she is 😃 )
Wouldn’t it be more fair to say that he did not explicitly write about it? That is, he could have belived it in a both/and way, but never got around to, or saw the need to write about it.
 
Wouldn’t it be more fair to say that he did not explicitly write about it? That is, he could have belived it in a both/and way, but never got around to, or saw the need to write about it.
I suppose so, but I personally doubt that was the case.
 
What does “ark of the New Covenant” mean?
The original Ark of the Covenant was basically a special box that was awesomely important for ancient Jews. It held a few things, but most importantly it held the presence of God Himself. It is the means by which God communicated with his people.

Some early Christians saw Mary as the new Ark, because she bore the presence of God within herself, in her womb. Check out these links:

catholic.com/thisrock/2005/0510fea5.asp

motherofallpeoples.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=598&Itemid=40
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top