Mary's Magnificat

  • Thread starter Thread starter dcana
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
D

dcana

Guest
“For the Mighty One has done great things for me” (NASB)
“For he that is mighty hath done to me great things” (KJV)

A question for anybody:

What “great things” has God done for Mary?
 
Gee, I don’t know. I mean, besides that “getting her pregnant with the Messiah and Savior of all mankind” thing…
 
Blessed her without original sin
Put enmity between her and the devil
Espoused her to the Holy Spirit
Delivered the Savior of the human race through her
Assumed her into heaven
Willed that all generations call her blessed
Made her the NT fulfillment of Eve, the Ark, the Garden, Noah’s Ark, Jacob’s Ladder, etc…
Made her Queen of heaven and earth

And the list goes on…
:o
 
Gee, I don’t know. I mean, besides that “getting her pregnant with the Messiah and Savior of all mankind” thing…
Hey! I’m just asking the question. Yes, that would be a great thing God has done for her.
Blessed her without original sin
Put enmity between her and the devil
Espoused her to the Holy Spirit
Delivered the Savior of the human race through her
Assumed her into heaven
Willed that all generations call her blessed
Made her the NT fulfillment of Eve, the Ark, the Garden, Noah’s Ark, Jacob’s Ladder, etc…
Made her Queen of heaven and earth

And the list goes on…
:o
Yes, those would be other great things that we as Catholics believe God did for her.
 
I think what the OP is getting at is “He removed her sin at the moment she was conceived”
 
Hey! I’m just asking the question. Yes, that would be a great thing God has done for her.
I apologize for being unnecessarily snarky.

The answer just seemed REALLY obvious to me.
 
I think what the OP is getting at is “He removed her sin at the moment she was conceived”
No, that’s not what I was getting at. I was just asking people to answer what they thought the “good things” that God did for her were.

I wished I would’ve asked this question several months ago. At my place of work, an outside company from Louisiana was hired to do some remodeling work. I struck up a conversation with one of the employees who it turns out was a Pentecostal and a former Catholic. Our conversation was basically about the Bible and he asked me why us Catholics make such a fuss about Mary. According to him, Mary was nothing but a “vessel” through which God the Son came into the world and that she was nothing special and like every other woman in the world. What a profoundly sad thing to believe! This doesn’t sound at all like the way God our loving Father does things. Anyway, as we were discussing the Bible, I responded along the lines of the Christological nature of the NT and how it was not in the view of the authors to write a theological discourse on Mary, etc. Which, I think, is true. Of course, being a good, “Bible-believin’” Pentecostal his assumption was that if something is not explicitly stated in the Bible, then it cannot be true - that is, there is no reason to believe that it is part of Divine Revelation.

So, I’m just asking the question. What great things did God do for Mary? He did certainly make her the mother of His Son. I would definitely agree that that would be a very “great” thing, although others would not (the “vessel” theory), but it is still only one thing. Mary said that God did “great things” for her, not “a great thing.”
 
I have also heard it said that if Mary’s answer to Gabriel would’ve been “no,” then he would’ve just gone to ask the girl next door if she would be the mother of the Messiah. Presumably, he would’ve just gone down the street until some young girl agreed to the plan. How terribly unbiblical. If Mary would’ve said “no” and the girl next door said “yes” then the girl next door would’ve been our “Mary,” the Woman known from all eternity in the mind of God (how about, “before I formed you in the womb, I knew you?”) and Mary may or may not have been recorded in Scripture, as being a woman who was was not “blessed because she believed.” In fact, she might be portrayed in our Bibles today as an example of someone who went on to be condemned for not doing the Will of God. “Not everyone who says to me, ‘Lord, Lord’ will enter the Kingdom of Heaven but only the one who does the Will of my Heavenly Father.” The girl next door would’ve sung the Magnificat at Elizabeth’s doorstep. Did not God have an eternity to think about and prepare the woman who would give birth to His Son? I think He’s an excellent designer, personally. Is He not also all-good and all-powerful? Is not the whole point of Creation to show His Glory and to share the Love He has and is from all eternity with His created beings? He does not randomly pick people and “use them” for His own purposes, like we would pick out a contractor from the phone book if we wanted to add an addition to our home. In fact, He doesn’t “randomly” do anything, nor do the angels who serve Him. The Word is the Supreme Architect Himself. Wouldn’t He put his best ideas into the “design,” if you will, of His own mother? But I digress.
 
I have also heard it said that if Mary’s answer to Gabriel would’ve been “no,” then he would’ve just gone to ask the girl next door if she would be the mother of the Messiah. Presumably, he would’ve just gone down the street until some young girl agreed to the plan. How terribly unbiblical. If Mary would’ve said “no” and the girl next door said “yes” then the girl next door would’ve been our “Mary,” the Woman known from all eternity in the mind of God (how about, “before I formed you in the womb, I knew you?”) and Mary may or may not have been recorded in Scripture, as being a woman who was was not “blessed because she believed.” In fact, she might be portrayed in our Bibles today as an example of someone who went on to be condemned for not doing the Will of God. “Not everyone who says to me, ‘Lord, Lord’ will enter the Kingdom of Heaven but only the one who does the Will of my Heavenly Father.” The girl next door would’ve sung the Magnificat at Elizabeth’s doorstep. Did not God have an eternity to think about and prepare the woman who would give birth to His Son? I think He’s an excellent designer, personally. Is He not also all-good and all-powerful? Is not the whole point of Creation to show His Glory and to share the Love He has and is from all eternity with His created beings? He does not randomly pick people and “use them” for His own purposes, like we would pick out a contractor from the phone book if we wanted to add an addition to our home. In fact, He doesn’t “randomly” do anything, nor do the angels who serve Him. The Word is the Supreme Architect Himself. Wouldn’t He put his best ideas into the “design,” if you will, of His own mother? But I digress.
And the Lord God, knowing for all eternity all things, created Mary, conceived without any blemish of original sin, protected by God’s Grace by ever sinning. Created Mary, unique and blessed among men. The singlar arc, Mary alone, worthy to bear our Lord and Savior to this Earth.

Gabriel “Hail Full of Grace, A child Shall be born of thee, who shall deliver all of humanity from sin”

Mary “How can this be, I have known no man”

Gabriel “By the power of the Holy Spirit shall thee bear the savior of man”

Mary “No Thanks!”

😦

(Thank God she said yes!)
 
Yeah, God really did put poor Mary in between a rock and a hard place there (luckily Mary was of course not nearly petty enough to feel mad about this and was suitably honored and humbled by her role as the Mother of God).

Mary: So, let’s see I don’t want to be the Mother of God. What happens then?

Gabriel: Well, the world would still be stuck being slaves to sin and death. The best case scenario is that we choose somebody else to be the Mother of God and they bear the Messiah, though of course that would make the whole thing way, way more difficult and will unneccessarily complicate a pretty good plan.

The worst case scenario is that the world is stuck being slaves to sin and death for centuries and possibly millennia. So what say you?

Mary: Yeah…I’ll have to give you a big N-O on this one Gabe, sorry.

Gabriel: 😦
 
I apologize for being unnecessarily snarky.

The answer just seemed REALLY obvious to me.
But sometimes the obvious is so wonderful restated…well sometimes.

How many times do we say Hail Mary…and each time it is fresh and new, proclaiming her as the angel said, “full of grace”, “blessed art thou,”

sometimes I want to ask people who accuse me of Mary worship, “Have you called her blessed today?”
 
“For the Mighty One has done great things for me” (NASB)
“For he that is mighty hath done to me great things” (KJV)

A question for anybody:

What “great things” has God done for Mary?
He preserved her from original sin and, therefore, the tendency to sin (concupiscence). He also gave her the gift of being able to love Him the way a mother loves her child. Think about it - everyone claims to “love” God, but how many of us have the ability to love God the way we love our children? She did, and that was an amazing gift!
 
According to him, Mary was nothing but a “vessel” through which God the Son came into the world and that she was nothing special and like every other woman in the world."
Just a comment on the above notation by your coworker… Even the “vessels” at Mass are called “sacred”. The tabernacle is highly regarded as sacred because it houses Our Lord. Why would we consider Mary to be any less than a sacred tabernacle? Mary WAS (and is) something special and certainly NOT like every other woman in the world. Maybe I am like every other woman in the world, but Mary was not. She is a tabernacle. That would be like saying a tabernacle is just a regular piece of furniture.
 
I have also heard it said that if Mary’s answer to Gabriel would’ve been “no,” then he would’ve just gone to ask the girl next door if she would be the mother of the Messiah. Presumably, he would’ve just gone down the street until some young girl agreed to the plan. How terribly unbiblical. If Mary would’ve said “no” and the girl next door said “yes” then the girl next door would’ve been our “Mary,” the Woman known from all eternity in the mind of God (how about, “before I formed you in the womb, I knew you?”) and Mary may or may not have been recorded in Scripture, as being a woman who was was not “blessed because she believed.” In fact, she might be portrayed in our Bibles today as an example of someone who went on to be condemned for not doing the Will of God. “Not everyone who says to me, ‘Lord, Lord’ will enter the Kingdom of Heaven but only the one who does the Will of my Heavenly Father.” The girl next door would’ve sung the Magnificat at Elizabeth’s doorstep. Did not God have an eternity to think about and prepare the woman who would give birth to His Son? I think He’s an excellent designer, personally. Is He not also all-good and all-powerful? Is not the whole point of Creation to show His Glory and to share the Love He has and is from all eternity with His created beings? He does not randomly pick people and “use them” for His own purposes, like we would pick out a contractor from the phone book if we wanted to add an addition to our home. In fact, He doesn’t “randomly” do anything, nor do the angels who serve Him. The Word is the Supreme Architect Himself. Wouldn’t He put his best ideas into the “design,” if you will, of His own mother? But I digress.
I think your Pentecostal friend’s viewpoint denies the eternal and omniscient nature of God. God is not bound by our concept of time–He exists eternally and all that happens is seen by Him in that light–God’s plan of salvation is an eternal plan–it never was not there, and Mary was included in that plan. Mary had freewill like all of us, but God, who is omniscient, “knew” she would say yes. Otherwise He is not omniscient. This is difficult to understand (and I don’t anyone who does), but it is like us–we have free will to choose God or reject Him, but ultimately, God already knows what we will choose. Thus, God would not merely have moved down the street to find someone else. There is no one else.

Now to me this is almost incomprehensible, but I have to accept the fact that we are both given free will and that God is omniscient. I will have to wait until I enter that realm to get a grip on this, but in the meantime, I will accept what the Church teaches as a matter of faith. And I will also say that I could be wrong on this, but someone will have to give me a good argument as to why. I’m not a philosopher or theologian, it’s just my understanding of what the Church teaches.

BTW, this is not the same as the predestination of Calvinism, but that is another discussion altogether, and I’m not going to derail the thread.
 
There’s that whole immaculate conception thing too.

Chuck
“For the Mighty One has done great things for me” (NASB)
“For he that is mighty hath done to me great things” (KJV)

A question for anybody:

What “great things” has God done for Mary?
 
I think your Pentecostal friend’s viewpoint denies the eternal and omniscient nature of God. God is not bound by our concept of time–He exists eternally and all that happens is seen by Him in that light–God’s plan of salvation is an eternal plan–it never was not there, and Mary was included in that plan. Mary had freewill like all of us, but God, who is omniscient, “knew” she would say yes. Otherwise He is not omniscient. This is difficult to understand (and I don’t anyone who does), but it is like us–we have free will to choose God or reject Him, but ultimately, God already knows what we will choose. Thus, God would not merely have moved down the street to find someone else. There is no one else.

Now to me this is almost incomprehensible, but I have to accept the fact that we are both given free will and that God is omniscient. I will have to wait until I enter that realm to get a grip on this, but in the meantime, I will accept what the Church teaches as a matter of faith. And I will also say that I could be wrong on this, but someone will have to give me a good argument as to why. I’m not a philosopher or theologian, it’s just my understanding of what the Church teaches.

BTW, this is not the same as the predestination of Calvinism, but that is another discussion altogether, and I’m not going to derail the thread.
 
I think your Pentecostal friend’s viewpoint denies the eternal and omniscient nature of God. God is not bound by our concept of time–He exists eternally and all that happens is seen by Him in that light–God’s plan of salvation is an eternal plan–it never was not there, and Mary was included in that plan. Mary had freewill like all of us, but God, who is omniscient, “knew” she would say yes. Otherwise He is not omniscient. This is difficult to understand (and I don’t anyone who does), but it is like us–we have free will to choose God or reject Him, but ultimately, God already knows what we will choose. Thus, God would not merely have moved down the street to find someone else. There is no one else.

Now to me this is almost incomprehensible, but I have to accept the fact that we are both given free will and that God is omniscient. I will have to wait until I enter that realm to get a grip on this, but in the meantime, I will accept what the Church teaches as a matter of faith. And I will also say that I could be wrong on this, but someone will have to give me a good argument as to why. I’m not a philosopher or theologian, it’s just my understanding of what the Church teaches.

BTW, this is not the same as the predestination of Calvinism, but that is another discussion altogether, and I’m not going to derail the thread.
Thank you for all of your answers; they have been great. I did notice that not one non-Catholic responded to the question. Of course, it’s no secret that my question is aimed at them. But no matter. I really don’t care if people answer or not. All I ask is that they consider what the Bible means when it says that God did great things for Mary. My question proves nothing regarding any particular Marian doctrine, but it is not supposed to prove anything. It merely asserts that God did great things for Mary as she, inspired by the Holy Spirit and as recorded in the Holy Scriptures, said that He did.

I noticed when I re-read my post describing my encounter with a Pentecostal that my first sentence was not clear. What I meant was that I wish I had asked him the question at that time, not that I had posted here to find out some responses to the question so I could go back “armed” with them the next day.

“Thus, God would not merely have moved down the street to find someone else. There is no one else.” Yes, that’s true. As Mary and her “yes” are, in fact, as we know now, part of God’s eternal plan for the salvation of mankind, then, as you said, “there is no one else.” But, if it had not been part of His plan, then He would’ve moved down the street, to the Woman who He (fore)knew would answer “yes.” That would’ve been his “plan” and Mary’s “no” would’ve been a part of it. But from God’s point of view, there weren’t two options, a “Plan A” and a “Plan B” that depended on Mary’s response. However, we marvel at the great things God has done; what He “might’ve done differently” is not important. By the way, does anybody know if there is a theological term for this “plan” for creation that God has? I, too, am neither a philosopher nor a theologian.

I agree that God’s omniscience/free will/predestination is a very heady subject. I can’t think of one more so. My poor little brain doesn’t go very far down the road when I start to consider these topics before it hits a roadblock. But what should I expect? God is God and who am I? It’s all a mystery. I often remember something Fr. Benedict Groeschel said in the course of a series of talks he gave regarding the nature of God. It is, “If anyone says to you that they have it all figured out, run the other way, because they don’t know what they’re talking about.” One of his central points was that God is mystery. Anything having to do with God is, ultimately, mysterious. We can ponder the points of theology but, ultimately, our probings and insights are only finite. We will see Him much more clearly in heaven than we do now, but still finitely. He spoke of mystery as something that can be known but never entirely understood (I’m paraphrasing here - it’s been 9 years since I watched it).

Peace
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top