Mary's Sacrifice

  • Thread starter Thread starter TantumErgo90
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
I found this on the vatican’s website: “Mary remains with Christ in some mysterious way in the Eucharist and is, after him, the “chief offerer” of the Eucharistic Sacrifice”. Link
I was always taught that Jesus, the High Priest, was the chief offerer and the priest was the secondary offerer. How does Our Lady fit into that?
Mary as a part of the Eucharist and an offerer of it is in a mystical way not a sacramental way. She is not a priest offering a sacrifice, she is a part of the sacrifice in that Jesus is of her and an offerer in that she gave her motherly consent and assisted by standing at the foot of the cross. That’s how I understand it.
 
Mary as a part of the Eucharist and an offerer of it is in a mystical way not a sacramental way. She is not a priest offering a sacrifice, she is a part of the sacrifice in that Jesus is of her and an offerer in that she gave her motherly consent and assisted by standing at the foot of the cross. That’s how I understand it.
Thanks! I think I understand it now. She is offering Jesus up to actively participate in the Redemption as proper to Her role. I like how you put things, if you would comment of Pope Benedict XV’s letter where he says “for the salvation of mankind she renounced her mother’s rights and, as far as it depended on her, offered her Son to placate divine justice”. I’m a bit confused how renouncing her rights and offering her son helped save man kind. Thanks and God Bless!
 
the author of the article on the website you link is unknown to me, as is the site, so I have no evidence that his article represents accurately Catholic teaching.

his footnote 47, which OP cites, is
23) Fr. James T. O’Connor, “Mary and the Eucharist” in Marian Studies, Vol. 34, 1983, 62.

also don’t know who this writer is, and what the journal is

someone more familiar with writer and journal is better able to comment on authenticity of website linked, article in general, and specifically this citation, which is NOT from a papal document.
 
Thank you for the clarification about the author. I am assuming that it is in accordance with Catholic teaching, but you are right it has not papal authority. I accept everything, I just like to understand.
 
Thanks! I think I understand it now. She is offering Jesus up to actively participate in the Redemption as proper to Her role. I like how you put things, if you would comment of Pope Benedict XV’s letter where he says “for the salvation of mankind she renounced her mother’s rights and, as far as it depended on her, offered her Son to placate divine justice”. I’m a bit confused how renouncing her rights and offering her son helped save man kind. Thanks and God Bless!
Thank you for your kind words. I’m using the line of thinking from some of the great Saints concerning Mary’s part in the salvific economy.

I believe what Pope Benedict XV (not BXVI?) is referring to here is that Mary would have been within her parental rights to beg Jesus and the Father not to offer himself. She abrogated those rights and instead joined her heart and mind to that of God so that the redemption was accomplished with her full consent and cooperation, as much as it lay within her rights and privileges to do so. Does that make sense?
 
That makes a lot of sense. She could have asked that Jesus not be crucified? Wow, I didn’t realize that. I did read in a book the if the executioners didn’t want to crucify Jesus, Mary would have done because it was the will of God. Could you shed light upon how Mary’s offering herself contributed to the Redemption of Man. Pope John Paul said Mary’s sufferings were “mysteriously and supernaturally fruitful”. I’m guessing that means we don’t know how her sufferings helped? Have the saints talked about this? Thanks again.
 
That makes a lot of sense. She could have asked that Jesus not be crucified? Wow, I didn’t realize that. I did read in a book the if the executioners didn’t want to crucify Jesus, Mary would have done because it was the will of God. Could you shed light upon how Mary’s offering herself contributed to the Redemption of Man. Pope John Paul said Mary’s sufferings were “mysteriously and supernaturally fruitful”. I’m guessing that means we don’t know how her sufferings helped? Have the saints talked about this? Thanks again.
Those questions deserve more than a quick reply here. I recommend to your reading: “The Glories of Mary” by St. Alphonsus de Ligouri and “True Devotion to Mary” by St. Louis Marie de Montfort. As men of their age they use the language of their day, which may sound a bit overly flowery to us (although I found it delightful, but that’s me). Not everything they have to say is to be taken as dogma, but they had wonderful insights into Mary’s place in the redemption and the life of the Church. Just read their words and let the Holy Spirit speak to your heart as you do. Both are spiritual reading of the highest order. And look into the writings of St. Maximillian Kolbe on Mary, too–very profound and enlightening.
 
Can someone explain" “As it is the Lord who offers and is offered in every Eucharist, and who, in and with himself, offers the sacrifice of praise of his entire Body, so, in him and with him, Mary offers and is offered in each Eucharistic celebration in that utterly unique way that reflects her role in the redemption her Son achieved for her and for all of us”. Is Mary offered at Mass?
 
Just as we, through the Holy Spirit, bring the gospel to others, and suffer to do so, as a part of His Body, so Mary brings the graces that only she as a mother can bring to the sons of the church.
Can someone explain" “As it is the Lord who offers and is offered in every Eucharist, and who, in and with himself, offers the sacrifice of praise of his entire Body, so, in him and with him, Mary offers and is offered in each Eucharistic celebration in that utterly unique way that reflects her role in the redemption her Son achieved for her and for all of us”. Is Mary offered at Mass?
The Saints in Heaven participate in every Mass. And just how do they participate? In Love of course. And if love is self-sacrifice, and does not end, there must be some way in which this sacrifice is an on-going thing for the sake of His Body, the Church.

IMHO

peace
steve
 
Can someone explain" “As it is the Lord who offers and is offered in every Eucharist, and who, in and with himself, offers the sacrifice of praise of his entire Body, so, in him and with him, Mary offers and is offered in each Eucharistic celebration in that utterly unique way that reflects her role in the redemption her Son achieved for her and for all of us”. Is Mary offered at Mass?
Yes she is offered at Mass, but then all of us are. We are all offered as a “living sacrifice” to God. Mary’s role, however, is unique in that she cooperated with the redemption of man as no one else ever did or ever could. Her place is utterly unique since Christ was incarnated from her body–her flesh and blood.
 
We are all offered at mass indeed as part of His body:

Catechism #1368 The Eucharist is also the sacrifice of the Church. The Church which is the Body of Christ participates in the offering of her Head. With him, she herself is offered whole and entire. She unites herself to his intercession with the Father for all men. In the Eucharist the sacrifice of Christ becomes also the sacrifice of the members of his Body. The lives of the faithful, their praise, sufferings, prayer, and work, are united with those of Christ and with his total offering, and so acquire a new value. Christ’s sacrifice present on the altar makes it possible for all generations of Christians to be united with his offering.

In the catacombs the Church is often represented as a woman in prayer, arms outstretched in the praying position. Like Christ who stretched out his arms on the cross, through him, with him, and in him, she offers herself and intercedes for all men.

Mary is also a figure of the Church. Scripture tells us that in a special way, Mary would suffer with Christ:

Luke 2:34-35 Then Simeon blessed them and said to Mary…“a sword will pierce your own soul too.”

Cross reference this with the birth of the Church:

Catechism # 766 “The origin and growth of the Church are symbolized by the blood and water which flowed from the open side of the crucified Jesus.”…the Church was born from the pierced heart of Christ hanging dead on the cross.

Perhaps that sheds light on the article you linked to. Check the indented paragraph toward the bottom that has footnote 42 in it.
 
I think I got it. The Priest offers Jesus to God at Mass, making present His sacrifice. Mary’s sacrifice is also made present just as Jesus’ sacrifice is. Jesus offers and is offered “in and with himself” but Mary offers and is offered “in and with Jesus”. The Popes have said Jesus’ sacrifice is inseparable from Mary’s sorrows. So since Jesus is offered, Mary is offered but in an secondary and consequent way. Without Jesus being offered, Mary would not be offered. I guess you could say she is “indirectly” offered? Does that sound correct? I read that within the cross there are two altars, Jesus’ and Mary’s. Mary gained for us merits de congruo what Jesus gained for us de condigno. So if Jesus is Mary’s sacrifice and Mary’s sufferings are totally untied to Jesus’ suffering would Mary’s sacrifice of offering Jesus and herself be never ending like Jesus’ sacrifice is? Do these sound right? Thanks.
 
I think I got it. The Priest offers Jesus to God at Mass, making present His sacrifice. Mary’s sacrifice is also made present just as Jesus’ sacrifice is. Jesus offers and is offered “in and with himself” but Mary offers and is offered “in and with Jesus”. The Popes have said Jesus’ sacrifice is inseparable from Mary’s sorrows. So since Jesus is offered, Mary is offered but in an secondary and consequent way. Without Jesus being offered, Mary would not be offered. I guess you could say she is “indirectly” offered? Does that sound correct? I read that within the cross there are two altars, Jesus’ and Mary’s. Mary gained for us merits de congruo what Jesus gained for us de condigno. So if Jesus is Mary’s sacrifice and Mary’s sufferings are totally untied to Jesus’ suffering would Mary’s sacrifice of offering Jesus and herself be never ending like Jesus’ sacrifice is? Do these sound right? Thanks.
Right, except I would use the term “perpetual” rather than “never ending” for the offering of Jesus’ and Mary’s sacrifice. After all, when the world ends there will be no more sacrifices offered on any altars because all will be fulfilled in Christ.
 
That makes sense. It puts a new perspective on the term “active participation”. When you think about it, it is quite beautiful, Mary is offered in and with Jesus (is that the same thing as Mary is offered through Jesus?) and she is our model on how we’re supposed to actively participate. This is something one could meditate about their entire lives.
 
That makes sense. It puts a new perspective on the term “active participation”. When you think about it, it is quite beautiful, Mary is offered in and with Jesus (is that the same thing as Mary is offered through Jesus?) and she is our model on how we’re supposed to actively participate. This is something one could meditate about their entire lives.
I think the wording close enough to mean the same thing, but then I’m not one to parse words just for the sake of it.

And one certainly could meditate upon this beautiful truth all one’s life. There are many such truths we ought to meditate upon. And reading good, solid spiritual reading is one way we do that.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top