I understand that a lot of people in close contact pose a risk for spreading disease, and I know that church/Mass is a place where a lot of people are in close contact. I wonder, though, when the risk of getting sick is a legitimate reason to miss Mass and when it isn’t. My DH and my MIL are both practicing Catholics who attend Mass on a regular basis. However, ever since I’ve known her, MIL seems to view church, in particular, as a breeding ground for disease. From what I know, years ago, someone in her family came home from Christmas Eve Mass vomiting, and I guess it was assumed the illness was contracted at church. Idk
When FIL was undergoing cancer treatment, neither he nor MIL went to Mass for months, not because he couldn’t physically get there but because he couldn’t afford to get sick and she couldn’t afford to get sick because then she wouldn’t be able to care for him. At least once, DH suggested he and I not go to church before visiting MIL and FIL because what if we got germs at church and then passed them along to MIL and FIL.
When DS1 was a year and a half, he came down with a stomach flu on Christmas Day after going to Mass on Christmas Eve. MIL and DH automatically assumed he got the bug at church. I guess it’s possible that he got it at church…but I’d say there are also other possibilities that they didn’t consider.
Four years ago, when I was pregnant with DS2, MIL, DH, and I were visiting my family in another state, and our flight home was on a Sunday. I don’t remember exactly the reason, but my MIL suggested we not go to Mass because something was said on the news about the flu, and I was pregnant. DH took it into consideration, and both of them left the decision to me, the pregnant person. I pointed out to DH that the airplane we were about to get on later that day was a risk as well—because of there being a lot of people in close contact—and he said, “Well, we can’t avoid the plane, but we can avoid going to church.” or something like that. We ended up going to Mass. No one got sick.
So, now with the corona virus crisis, MIL is staying away from church, and DH is being extra vigilant. I’m just wondering how much of this is “bias” toward church being “the great house of germs” and how much is legitimate. Thoughts?
When FIL was undergoing cancer treatment, neither he nor MIL went to Mass for months, not because he couldn’t physically get there but because he couldn’t afford to get sick and she couldn’t afford to get sick because then she wouldn’t be able to care for him. At least once, DH suggested he and I not go to church before visiting MIL and FIL because what if we got germs at church and then passed them along to MIL and FIL.
When DS1 was a year and a half, he came down with a stomach flu on Christmas Day after going to Mass on Christmas Eve. MIL and DH automatically assumed he got the bug at church. I guess it’s possible that he got it at church…but I’d say there are also other possibilities that they didn’t consider.
Four years ago, when I was pregnant with DS2, MIL, DH, and I were visiting my family in another state, and our flight home was on a Sunday. I don’t remember exactly the reason, but my MIL suggested we not go to Mass because something was said on the news about the flu, and I was pregnant. DH took it into consideration, and both of them left the decision to me, the pregnant person. I pointed out to DH that the airplane we were about to get on later that day was a risk as well—because of there being a lot of people in close contact—and he said, “Well, we can’t avoid the plane, but we can avoid going to church.” or something like that. We ended up going to Mass. No one got sick.
So, now with the corona virus crisis, MIL is staying away from church, and DH is being extra vigilant. I’m just wondering how much of this is “bias” toward church being “the great house of germs” and how much is legitimate. Thoughts?
Last edited: