Mass attendance and Humanæ Vitæ

  • Thread starter Thread starter YoungTradCath
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
very good synopsis N.E.P. - I had never really heard it put quite that way… I was in grade 4 in 68 so the hoopla was somewhat lost on me…another point I think that has a strong bearing is the amount of educators in Catholic schools that have come out of the 60’s and 70’s, including a lot of our priests.
the “conscience” advice has been given a great number of times by well meaning priests who may not have had the strongest guidance in seminary in the 70’s.

I have 4 children who came up through the Catholic school system here in Canada, and sadly, I failed to be a strong enough influence to overcome what they were taught in school…I was old fashioned and “not with it” as their religion class was not so much about our faith as it was about world religions and trying to find the good in all…while the Church has always taught that under certain circumstances non-Catholics could still go to heaven, the mis-interpretation of VII led many to believe it didn’t matter, as long as one was good and moral.

Our Holy Father referred to this recently in a statement about the number of young people who through no fault of their own, consider themselves Catholic and generally try to live the faith to their understanding, but due to poor teaching, they fall short of the mark.

I see this in my kids, and see it clearly…other than very sporadic Church attendance they would be considered pretty good Catholics…they live life generally showing many of the traits (better than some church goers I know) that one would look for…I find this disconcerting and hope as they get a little older they return to regular active participation.

The Holy Father says we need to discover how to reach out to these people…generally when these issues are discussed here, the opinions are usually quite extreme…either very liberal, or very strict and I personally find many of these issues are a little grey, not as black and white as some seem to make it out to be.

I find great judgements made at times in these discussions, whereas the Holy Father seems to want us to reach out with compassion and prayer…he is our rock and our guide in these matters.

How many folks are there out there that may consider themselves Catholic, and through no outright rejection, but as a result of their poor teaching at some point in their journey “honestly” do not see themselves as sinning…what does our Blessed Mother think when she sees these children, is her heart broken? And what of our Lord…his justice and his mercy must surely be tested in this situation…will he have compassion on these misguided, or will he shuffle them off on judgement day?

Somehow, I see this as the greatest challenge to our Church today, how do we reach these people…calling them cafeteria catholics, and worse, does nothing to solve the phenomena, we need compassion, reason and patience…

sorry for the long winded response, but I see this as much an issue with Mass attendance as the encyclical…maybe I am off base, but I know a lot of people like this, in my family and outside of it.

I have a cousin who has been a Fransiscan priest for 50 years… his advice is to encourage them to be honest and to seek…where that leads them we will never know, but he also believes that if they are truly honest, at some point God will reach them…whether they are young, or on their deathbed, if they honestly question and seek He will not allow them to be lost, He will answer them in His own time.
 
Things got even worse when it leaked out that that commission Pope Paul VI set up to review the birth control issue had actually recommended to him that the teaching be changed.
Father, is my understanding correct that then Karol Wartyla (later JPII) was part of that commission that recommended that there be changes??
 
Father, is my understanding correct that then Karol Wartyla (later JPII) was part of that commission that recommended that there be changes??
:eek:

Humanae Vitae has been taught to me as an example of God not allowing the Church to teach error. Even though most thought Pope Paul VI was going to allow contraception as per the recommendations, he couldn’t do it.

Has anyone else heard it put this way?
 
Truelight,

Im not sure my understanding is correct. Im just wanting to find out if it is accurate, one way or the other.

I heard this from a papal historian, but I dont know how much Wortyla was part of the commission or if he was just an advisor to it?

Hoping NEpriest can shed some light since he does seem to have a good hold of the time. 🙂
 
TL, I heard that JPI was considering rescinding it…some feel that is why he was called home so quickly…of course there are all kinds of other stories about JPI, most notably in a book called “in God’s name”…a very disturbing book for a catholic
 
:eek:

Humanae Vitae has been taught to me as an example of God not allowing the Church to teach error. Even though most thought Pope Paul VI was going to allow contraception as per the recommendations, he couldn’t do it.

Has anyone else heard it put this way?
It’s my understanding that Paul VI agonized over it for a couple of years prior to issuing Humanae Vitae.
 
Father, is my understanding correct that then Karol Wartyla (later JPII) was part of that commission that recommended that there be changes??
He was indeed part of the commission but he did not agree with the majority of the commission and he helped author the “minority report” that argued to keep the teaching as it was.
 
TL, I heard that JPI was considering rescinding it….some feel that is why he was called home so quickly…of course there are all kinds of other stories about JPI, most notably in a book called “in God’s name”…a very disturbing book for a catholic
Really??!!

All interesting stuff!
 
Really??!!

All interesting stuff!
yes, that book is actually a good topic for a thread…as odd as it sounds, it is a book that caused me to take a closer look at my Catholic faith, and helped me return fully, but this is a thread drift, so I should stop now
 
yes, that book is actually a good topic for a thread…as odd as it sounds, it is a book that caused me to take a closer look at my Catholic faith, and helped me return fully, but this is a thread drift, so I should stop now
You mean “In God’s Name?”
 
In God’s Name by David Yallop

have you read it?
No, but I just looked at the summary on Amazon. It is claiming that Pope John Paul I was murdered and that the Vatican covered it up?

The brought you back to the faith? 😛
 
it is a fascinating book, and it does leave a number of questions that have never been answered - very well worth the read in my view

after reading it I looked deeper in to our Church…and when I realized the Church was full of sinners who were not perfect I figured there was room for me

although I don’t measure up to what many think a Catholic should be, I still struggle with some things…but as I struggle I just try to count on Jesus to prop me up with his love…and hopefully a lot of mercy
 
it is a fascinating book, and it does leave a number of questions that have never been answered - very well worth the read in my view

after reading it I looked deeper in to our Church…and when I realized the Church was full of sinners who were not perfect I figured there was room for me

although I don’t measure up to what many think a Catholic should be, I still struggle with some things…but as I struggle I just try to count on Jesus to prop me up with his love…and hopefully a lot of mercy
Praise God. 🙂
 
I just learned about the Winnipeg Statement put out by Bishops in Canada 2 months after Humane Vitae was released. Shocking, but interesting stuff!
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Winnipeg_Statement
Published two months after Humanae Vitae, the Winnipeg Statement was an attempt by the Canadian Conference of Catholic Bishops to address widespread concern within the Church about the prohibition of all forms of artificial contraception, and to counsel its members on how to respond to those who have difficulty accepting the directives.
It recognized that many Catholics, in spite of being bound by the encyclical, find it “either extremely difficult or even impossible to make their own all elements of this doctrine”. These “should not be considered, or consider themselves, shut off from the body of the faithful. But they should remember that their good faith will be dependent on a sincere self-examination to determine the true motives and grounds for such suspension of assent and on continued effort to understand and deepen their knowledge of the teaching of the Church.”[3] With regard to those in that situation, “the confessor or counsellor must show sympathetic understanding and reverence for the sincere good faith of those who fail in their effort to accept some point of the encyclical.”[4]
Paragraph 26 stated: “In accord with the accepted principles of moral theology, if these persons have tried sincerely but without success to pursue a line of conduct in keeping with the given directives, they may be safely assured that, whoever honestly chooses that course which seems right to him does so in good conscience.”[5] (Emphasis added.)
In its conclusion, the document referred to the moment of the publication of the encyclical as an “hour of crisis”, but added: “The unity of the Church does not consist in a bland conformity in all ideas, but rather in a union of faith and heart, in submission to God’s will and a humble but honest and ongoing search for the truth.” It stated: “We stand in union with the Bishop of Rome the successor of Peter, the sign and contributing cause of our unity with Christ and with one another. But this very union postulates such a love of the Church that we can do no less than to place all of our love and all of our intelligence at its service. If this sometimes means that in our desire to make the Church more intelligible and more beautiful we must, as pilgrims do, falter in the way or differ as to the way, no one should conclude that our common faith is lost or our loving purpose blunted.”[6
[/quote]
 
I just learned about the Winnipeg Statement put out by Bishops in Canada 2 months after Humane Vitae was released. Shocking, but interesting stuff!
Several national episcopal conferences issued similar statements.
 
So before Humanae Vitae came out, was there no definitive teaching on ABC at all?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top