Mass in a home?

  • Thread starter Thread starter nova147
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
N

nova147

Guest
Ok, this is a little weird. I just got an email invite to a Mass that is going to be celebrated in the home of a friend of mine. Really. By the parish priest (ok, not my parish priest, but a parish priest). I did a quick look at a few of my normal sources for info on these things and found no references. Is this licit? My gut says it isn’t, but does anyone know Church law on it?

MJ
 
Pax tecum!

Yes, that is certainly OK to do! My uncle says Mass at our house and our cousins’ house sometimes. In fact, back in the early Church Mass would be celebrated in people’s homes all the time because there were no churches yet. As long as the Order of the Mass is followed, just as in any Mass, it is perfectly OK to have Mass somewhere other than in a church building.

In Christ,
Rand
 
Ok, this is a little weird. I just got an email invite to a Mass that is going to be celebrated in the home of a friend of mine. Really. By the parish priest (ok, not my parish priest, but a parish priest). I did a quick look at a few of my normal sources for info on these things and found no references. Is this licit? My gut says it isn’t, but does anyone know Church law on it?

MJ
No problem-when my Parish first started we alternated daily Mass at various homes until we found a gymnasitcs center that would let us do it in one of their training rooms!
 
It would be licit if the priest received permission from the local bishop. He has jurisdiction on whether or not Mass can be said outside of a Church.

From RS:

Chapter V
CERTAIN OTHER MATTERS CONCERNING THE EUCHARIST
  1. The Place for the Celebration of Holy Mass
    [108.] “The celebration of the Eucharist is to be carried out in a sacred place, unless in a particular case necessity requires otherwise. In this case the celebration must be in a decent place”.197 The diocesan Bishop shall be the judge for his diocese concerning this necessity, on a case-by-case basis.
adoremus.org/RedemptionisSacramentum.html#anchor1186479
 
Ok, this is a little weird. I just got an email invite to a Mass that is going to be celebrated in the home of a friend of mine. Really. By the parish priest (ok, not my parish priest, but a parish priest). I did a quick look at a few of my normal sources for info on these things and found no references. Is this licit? My gut says it isn’t, but does anyone know Church law on it?

MJ
Home Masses are not permitted in general. All Masses are to be public celebrations, not by “invitation only”. Mass should always be celebrated in a church or chapel with a consecrated altar or at least a blessed one. Only under necessity should Mass be celebrated elsewhere.
 
Home Masses are not permitted in general. All Masses are to be public celebrations, not by “invitation only”. Mass should always be celebrated in a church or chapel with a consecrated altar or at least a blessed one. Only under necessity should Mass be celebrated elsewhere.
I guess this is the heart of my concern. From the invite I got, the parish intends to do these Masses in various different neighborhoods, all in individual’s homes. But their is a beautiful, newly renovated building that can and is used for daily and weekly Masses. There is no necessity here.

Thank you for your responses.

MJ
 
If you feel unsure, why don’t you call your diocese and ask? Surely they’d know if the priest has permission.
 
I just went to a traditional Latin Mass last week that was celebrated in the priest’s home, on his private altar…the intimacy of the setting, and its simplicity made it very solemn in a way…it was lovely. 👍
 
I just went to a traditional Latin Mass last week that was celebrated in the priest’s home, on his private altar…the intimacy of the setting, and its simplicity made it very solemn in a way…it was lovely. 👍
OK - I may come across as a snob here - but that is not the intent - but this did touch a nerve of mine for some reason. In reading your post Anima Christi - I was struck by just a sense of concern that at times blinds us all. The poster a few below did an excelent job of pointing out the church position on this. Unless given permission by the bishop - Masses are supposed to be in a sacred place, etc. Although your Mass was on a private altar - I’m sure that quite a few people who have “home Masses” would feel equally as intimate, equally as solemn, and feel it was equally lovely. But…our feelings like this aren’t really what should be the guide. In a bizzare twist of logic - someone who was having an “affair” could feel so much more “intimate, solemn, lovely” with someone not their spouse - but that again isn’t what it is about. We should strive to follow the church teaching on all such things - especially something so important as the Mass.

Long story short - if the Church feels strongly enough about the Mass that they say it should be celebrated in a church (sacred setting) unless strictly given the approval of the Bishop - that should be the end of it - no matter how intimate, lovely, or solemn some private setting would be to us.

So often we seem guided by the logic of “it feels so right - how can it be wrong?” that we never even stop to investigate it at all.

God Bless!
 
Home Masses are not permitted in general. All Masses are to be public celebrations, not by “invitation only”. Mass should always be celebrated in a church or chapel with a consecrated altar or at least a blessed one. Only under necessity should Mass be celebrated elsewhere.
I know of many Masses celebrated “elsewhere”, always for a very special occasion, and likely by permission of the local Bishop.

While some Masses were in other locations, there was actually a general announcement that went out, as well as e-mails, etc. for maybe a specific group affected. Thus, it was not “private”. Had anyone expressed interest in coming, or showed up at the door, they would not have been turned away.

Additionally, “invitation only”…well, most people don’t randomly attend funeral or wedding Masses. They are held at the Church, of course, but they seem to be more “invitational” than anything. I have an adoration hour at the time on Saturdays in which weddings are usually scheduled in the main sanctuary. Although it is “public” I would actually not feel comfortably in attending that Mass.

By custom, if not by law, it is “invitation only”. Does that make it illicit? I don’t think it does.

I don’t really think home Masses are an abuse…the priests I know who have performed them have done so very reverently and have taken great pains to educate those who attended, and those people actually walked away with a far greater understanding of each movement of the Mass. None of them would want this to be done regularly, but saw this as a special glimpse, a special gift.

But I can see how this can be abused and why the law is needed and why it must be regulated.
 
OK - I may come across as a snob here - but that is not the intent - but this did touch a nerve of mine for some reason. In reading your post Anima Christi - I was struck by just a sense of concern that at times blinds us all. The poster a few below did an excelent job of pointing out the church position on this. Unless given permission by the bishop - Masses are supposed to be in a sacred place, etc. Although your Mass was on a private altar - I’m sure that quite a few people who have “home Masses” would feel equally as intimate, equally as solemn, and feel it was equally lovely. But…our feelings like this aren’t really what should be the guide. In a bizzare twist of logic - someone who was having an “affair” could feel so much more “intimate, solemn, lovely” with someone not their spouse - but that again isn’t what it is about. We should strive to follow the church teaching on all such things - especially something so important as the Mass.

Long story short - if the Church feels strongly enough about the Mass that they say it should be celebrated in a church (sacred setting) unless strictly given the approval of the Bishop - that should be the end of it - no matter how intimate, lovely, or solemn some private setting would be to us.

So often we seem guided by the logic of “it feels so right - how can it be wrong?” that we never even stop to investigate it at all.

God Bless!
Well, first of all I was merely commenting on the Mass itself, I was not using that to justify having Masses outside of a Church. I’m not sure why you are assuming the bishop did not give permission or that there was not a good reason to have a Mass in the priest’s home, but I perhaps I should have given some background information. Our local Latin Mass Community does not have its own church…it has to actually pay several hundred dollars per month to a parish in the diocese to use their church for Masses, since it is the only parish in town which still has its high altar intact and the only one where the tabernacle is actually located in the sanctuary, behind the altar (imagine that…one group of Catholics having to PAY another Catholic parish to use their church for Mass!) We have a “sacramental minister”, an FSSP affiliated priest, (not a pastor, since we are not a parish…but then again, it seems common in this diocese for parishes to have “sacramental ministers” but be pastored by a female “pastoral associate”–but I digress…) who says daily masses in the church, but sometimes due to circumstances we are unable to have Mass in the church. This particular occassion was a “First Friday”, so Father offered to have a Mass in his home so that those who were practicing the First Friday/Sacred Heart devotion could fufill the requirements of this devotion by going to Mass and receiving communion on that day, as Our Lord stipulated in His apparition to St. Margaret Mary, since we could not have Mass in the church that day. Is a priest supposed to go without offering the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass just because he can’t say it in an actual church? Are people to be deprived of the graces of Holy Mass just because for some reason it cannot be celebrated in a church? Not only do I think that this was allowed because it was for a serious reason, but I have a feeling that a priest’s own private chapel does constitute a “sacred place”. Even if this is not the case, I doubt the bishop is concerned that Masses are not being celebrated in “sacred places”, since the cathedral parish has a “Mass in the grass” every year at their annual parish picnic…
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top