Mass of the Lord's Supper

  • Thread starter Thread starter PJD1987
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
P

PJD1987

Guest
Question regarding Mass Readings, in particular this one:

The 2nd Reading for the Mass of the Lord’s Supper:

Reading 2 1 COR 11:23-26

Brothers and sisters:
I received from the Lord what I also handed on to you,
that the Lord Jesus, on the night he was handed over,
took bread, and, after he had given thanks,
broke it and said, “This is my body that is for you.
Do this in remembrance of me.”
In the same way also the cup, after supper, saying,
“This cup is the new covenant in my blood.
Do this, as often as you drink it, in remembrance of me.”
For as often as you eat this bread and drink the cup,
you proclaim the death of the Lord until he comes.

I find it interesting that the next 5 verses which discuss receiving unworthily and eating and drinking judgment upon oneself are omitted. One would think this would be a rather important sentiment to impress upon the people, especially in today’s Church where reception of Communion is sadly taken so flippantly by many. There are other readings for Mass where St. Paul’s words are cut off the verse before he speaks against homosexuality, impurity, and other vices and sins.

I’m interested in those with thoughts or knowledge as to how and why these decisions were made when the Missal was put together.

Why has the Church censored its own Holy Scripture? It seems not taking the opportunity to reiterate these highly important, yet often forgotten teachings, purposefully or not, is abdicating its own responsibility to catechize the faithful. In an era where we face massive catechetical shortfalls…does the Church hurt its own cause by making these omissions?

God bless!
  • Paul
 
It is worth noting that the traditional Mass, or at least in the 1962 rubrics according to my missal, the following verses are included.
 
Question regarding Mass Readings, in particular this one:

The 2nd Reading for the Mass of the Lord’s Supper:

Reading 2 1 COR 11:23-26

Brothers and sisters:
I received from the Lord what I also handed on to you,
that the Lord Jesus, on the night he was handed over,
took bread, and, after he had given thanks,
broke it and said, “This is my body that is for you.
Do this in remembrance of me.”
In the same way also the cup, after supper, saying,
“This cup is the new covenant in my blood.
Do this, as often as you drink it, in remembrance of me.”
For as often as you eat this bread and drink the cup,
you proclaim the death of the Lord until he comes.

I find it interesting that the next 5 verses which discuss receiving unworthily and eating and drinking judgment upon oneself are omitted. One would think this would be a rather important sentiment to impress upon the people, especially in today’s Church where reception of Communion is sadly taken so flippantly by many. There are other readings for Mass where St. Paul’s words are cut off the verse before he speaks against homosexuality, impurity, and other vices and sins.

I’m interested in those with thoughts or knowledge as to how and why these decisions were made when the Missal was put together.

Why has the Church censored its own Holy Scripture? It seems not taking the opportunity to reiterate these highly important, yet often forgotten teachings, purposefully or not, is abdicating its own responsibility to catechize the faithful. In an era where we face massive catechetical shortfalls…does the Church hurt its own cause by making these omissions?

God bless!
  • Paul
Priest: Behold the Lamb of God, behold him who takes away the sins of the world. Blessed are those called to the supper of the Lamb.
All: Lord, I am not worthy that you should enter under my roof, but only say the word and my soul shall be healed.
 
Just to clarify, this has to do with the Lectionary, not the Missal.

I think Deacon’s explanation is good. We don’t need to interpret it as some sort of conspiracy from within the Church to water down Catholic teaching. Since none of us were part of the group that assembled the Lectionary readings, all we can do is speculate. In such cases, I find it best to defer to simple explanations rather than those involving nefarious plots.
 
I find it best to defer to simple explanations rather than those involving nefarious plots.
Did not mean to imply anything about a nefarious plot. Just interested in the thinking behind these decisions. Thanks for all the replies

God bless
  • Paul
 
Did not mean to imply anything about a nefarious plot. Just interested in the thinking behind these decisions. Thanks for all the replies

God bless
  • Paul
Sorry for implying that you did. It is an interesting question, and one I’d be curious to hear an answer to from someone who was part of the process.
 
The reading as it is written from the Lectionary perfectly conveys what the Mass of the Lord’s Supper is all about. It focuses on the reason for it. In this particular Mass it is not necessary to go into exhortations about it.
 
All: Lord, I am not worthy that you should enter under my roof, but only say the word and my soul shall be healed.
A great act of faith which was rewarded without Christ actually coming under the centurion’s roof.
 
A great act of faith which was rewarded without Christ actually coming under the centurion’s roof.
And exceptional:

Matt 8:10 And Jesus hearing this, marveled; and said to them that followed him: Amen I say to you, I have not found so great faith in Israel.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top