Matthew 21 1-7 - How did Jesus ride two animals at once?

  • Thread starter Thread starter runandsew
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
R

runandsew

Guest
Matthew 21:7
they brought the **** and the colt, and put their garments on them, and he sat thereon.

***(sorry this won’t let me post the animal that Jesus rode…LOL)

When Jesus is preparing for his triumphal entry into Jerusalem, he has the two disciples bring him a colt and an ***.
They put the cloth on them and then Jesus mounted them and rode them into the city to fulfill the old testament.

How did he do this?

Did he ride each one for a little time and then switch, or did they duct tape them together so Jesus could ride them both at once?

Though I joke a little here, I am curious of what the passage is meaning when it says that he rode both of them.
 
Matthew 21:7
they brought the **** and the colt, and put their garments on them, and he sat thereon.

***(sorry this won’t let me post the animal that Jesus rode…LOL)

When Jesus is preparing for his triumphal entry into Jerusalem, he has the two disciples bring him a colt and an ***.
They put the cloth on them and then Jesus mounted them and rode them into the city to fulfill the old testament.

How did he do this?

Did he ride each one for a little time and then switch, or did they duct tape them together so Jesus could ride them both at once?

Though I joke a little here, I am curious of what the passage is meaning when it says that he rode both of them.
From the Haydock Hope this helps:Ver. 2. Go ye into the village; in Latin, Castellum, but in Greek, eis ten komen, which is, before you, contra vos, as Virgil says, Italiam contra. (Æneid i.) Some authors think it was Bethphage. (Haydock) — An *** tied,[1]* and a colt with her.* This colt, which never yet had been rid upon, represented the people of the Gentiles, to whom God had not given a written law, as he had done to the Jews. Here was manifestly fulfilled the prophecy of Zacharias. (Chap. ix.) It was now the first day of the week, in which Christ suffered; he was pleased to enter into Jerusalem in a kind of triumph, the people making acclamations to him, as to their king and Messias. (Witham) — Both Jews and Gentiles, figured by the *** and the colt, are to be loosed and conducted by the hands of the apostles of Christ to their Redeemer. The Gentiles, represented by the colt, though heretofore unclean, no sooner receive Jesus resting upon them, than they are freed from every stain and rendered perfectly clean. The zeal of the Gentiles, is spoken of by St. Paul, Romans xi. 25. Blindness in part has happened in Israel, until the fulness of the Gentiles should come in. And so all Israel should be saved. (St. Chrysostom, hom. lxvi.) — As it is written, “there shall come out of Sion, he that shall deliver, and shall turn away ungodliness from Jacob. And this is to them my covenant;” when I shall take away their sins. This prophecy of Isaias (lix. 20.) St. Paul applies to the conversion of the Jews; (ibid. [Romans xi. 25]) and thus both Jew and Gentile are to take up our Saviour’s yoke, which is certainly sweet, and his burden light

Ver. 7. Sit thereon. St. Jerome reprobates the opinion of those who suppose that Christ rode upon both the *** and the colt, though without sufficient reason. The Greek indeed, epano auton, upon them, may be referred either to the beasts or to Greek: ta imatia, the garments; but the very general sentiment is, that he first sat upon the *** for a short time, and then mounted the colt. It may be asked why Jesus, who through humility had during his whole life travelled on foot, and in no one previous instance is found to have allowed himself the convenience of riding, should on this occasion enter Jerusalem riding? One reason was, as mentioned in note on ver. 4, supra, to fulfil the prophecy of Zarcharias, who had given this mark of the Messias. Hence St. John (Chrysostom, hom. lxvi.) challenges the Jews to shew him any other king of theirs, who had entered Jerusalem riding on an ***. Other reasons were, to give a faint specimen of his real kingly dignity before he suffered; to be publicly acknowledged for the Messias; to confirm the faith of his disciples; and to leave his enemies no excuse for their incredulity. On this, as on all other occasions, magnificence is admirably blended with humility, in our Saviour’s actions. Even in this his triumph, we cannot help admiring his humility, in riding upon an ***. (Jansenius) — The glorious reception he met with from the people, was perfectly voluntary on their parts, the genuine effusions of their hearts, and as such, infinitely superior to the vain and often forced parade bestowed upon earthly princes; and is commemorated in the blessing and distributing palms in the Catholic Church, on Palm-Sunday, all over the Christian world.

JeanneH
 
Matthew 21:7
they brought the **** and the colt, and put their garments on them, and he sat thereon.

***(sorry this won’t let me post the animal that Jesus rode…LOL)

When Jesus is preparing for his triumphal entry into Jerusalem, he has the two disciples bring him a colt and an ***.
They put the cloth on them and then Jesus mounted them and rode them into the city to fulfill the old testament.

How did he do this?

Did he ride each one for a little time and then switch, or did they duct tape them together so Jesus could ride them both at once?

Though I joke a little here, I am curious of what the passage is meaning when it says that he rode both of them.
His human nature rode the *** and his divine nature road the colt. 😛
 
JeanneH

Thanks for your reply, I had not even thought about the spiritual meaning of this passage, I found that very interesting.
I was hoping more for the literal meaning, how was it possible to ride both the colt and the a ss? (That is the closest I can get this to read ***. LOL)

Luke and Mark just have them going for the colt, while John has them going for the a ss. I guess Matthew is a compromise.
 
I think Jesus sat upon one of the animals, naturally. BUT, since the *** and the colt (as mother-animal and its offspring) could not be separated, they are treated as one animal linguistically.
 
Jeanne, very good points. Something to add to it:

An unbroken colt would often be too wild to be ridden. But if their mother was within sight, they wouldn’t panic and would let someone ride on them.

The colt could represent the New Covenant and the A** could represent the Old Covenant, without which we wouldn’t be able to understand the New Covenant (?).

Am I making any sense, here?
 
The Navarre bible states that Jesus rode the colt, That Matthew wrote about both the *** and the colt, because he was giving more details from the prophesy in the old testament (since he was writing to the Jews). The other two synoptic gospels state that he rode the colt, and after re-reading John, he states that Jesus rode the “young ***” which I take to mean the colt.
The Navarre also mentions the spiritual meanings which were mentioned in the previous posts.
 
For the purposes of this thread, you might try using the word “donkey”. It will probably make things a bit more legible.

Mane Nobiscum Domine,
Ferdinand Mary
 
Matthew 21:7
they brought the **** and the colt, and put their garments on them, and he sat thereon.

Though I joke a little here, I am curious of what the passage is meaning when it says that he rode both of them.
Hebrew poetry uses parallelism. The poet says the same thing twice in two verses, usually using a different word for the same thing.
To take a verse at random

Of the rock that begat thee thou art unmindful
and hast forgotten God that formed thee.
(Deuteronomy 32:18)

The use of colt and *** is an example of the same thing. The gospel writer has misinterpreted “this was to fulfil the prophecy” and made Jesus ride two animals. It is most unlikely that more than one was used.
 
This whole thread reminded me of a You Tube video atheists like that is called “Kiss Hank’s donkey

😛

You really ought to check it out.

Oh, Back to topic. Could the discrepency in the gospels be due to the Q document?:confused:
 
Jeanne, very good points. Something to add to it:

An unbroken colt would often be too wild to be ridden. But if their mother was within sight, they wouldn’t panic and would let someone ride on them.

The colt could represent the New Covenant and the A** could represent the Old Covenant, without which we wouldn’t be able to understand the New Covenant (?).

Am I making any sense, here?
Hi Notworthy,

I was away–therefore the delay,
Yes you are making sense. Something else to think about.

Hi Runandsew,
I hope I gave you a little something to think about.

JeanneH
 
Most likely Jesus rode upon the mother donkey, and the colt was following closely behind or beside.

Perhaps they thought of the “donkey and colt” as one unit, rather than as two units. When they said that Jesus was riding a donkey and colt, they simply meant that Jesus was riding on a female donkey, and its colt was following along closely. (Or perhaps he was riding on the colt, and its mother was following along closely. Same difference, either way.)

Kind of like when someone says, “I rode in a horse and buggy.” We understand that the person was riding in the buggy, and that the horse was pulling the buggy, but someone not knowing how that works might wonder how one person managed to be both on the horse and in the buggy.
 
This whole thread reminded me of a You Tube video atheists like that is called “Kiss Hank’s donkey

😛

You really ought to check it out.

Oh, Back to topic. Could the discrepency in the gospels be due to the Q document?:confused:
The whole Q Document is only a theory. Plus, it is said to only contain sayings of Jesus, so stories are out of the question.

I for one also believe there is no Q. After all, how could the Apostles have Divine Inspiration if they only copied from it?

To the question. Jesus must have rode either one of the donkeys with one eitherbeside or in front of the other, at least that’s how it was depicted in art.
 
The whole Q Document is only a theory. Plus, it is said to only contain sayings of Jesus, so stories are out of the question.

I for one also believe there is no Q. After all, how could the Apostles have Divine Inspiration if they only copied from it?To the question. Jesus must have rode either one of the donkeys with one eitherbeside or in front of the other, at least that’s how it was depicted in art.
I only asked if the Church has made a statement if it does not exist.
 
I believe Jesus could ride more that one animal at a time–He was talented enough to create them you know?
 
Hi Runandsew,

The “them” refers to the garments. Jesus sat on the garments.There is no mention of the animal on which he sat. One must assume that he rode the mother and brought the young one along to spare it distress. Anyone used to animals would know that.

Verbum
 
Come on you guys!

All it says is that Jesus sat on the garments. And it’s natural to assume that he rode the mother, the colt being brought along to avoid distressing it.

Verbum
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top