The_Reginator
Active member
I was just watching Sex & Morality
I have oft heard the argument that “masturbation isn’t wrong, it’s normal”.
This part of the presentation addresses this idea in a way I had never thought of before:
[To think that normal = good reminds me of that old argument that simply because homosexual behaviour can be observed in nature that it is therefore ‘natural’. Just because some activity is present in the lower life forms does not mean that it is the normal or natural way to behave. What we see is an anomaly. I could go on … ]
I have oft heard the argument that “masturbation isn’t wrong, it’s normal”.
This part of the presentation addresses this idea in a way I had never thought of before:
Ah yes. Of course. Just because something is ‘normal’ does not at all mean that it is good.There is of course the popular culture response that masturbation is normal … everyone
does it … so what’s the big deal. Many things can be considered as normal and still be
wrong.
The Church often understands the word NORMAL in the context of normal or usual for
human beings weakened by the material effects of original sin.
It is for example, NORMAL for people to get sick, lose their tempers, lie, cheat, gossip,
yet none of these should be thought of as good.
For some people arriving late to work or leaving early is quite normal, but ask their boss
or colleagues if such NORMAL behavior is good and you will undoubtedly receive a
very unambiguous response.
[To think that normal = good reminds me of that old argument that simply because homosexual behaviour can be observed in nature that it is therefore ‘natural’. Just because some activity is present in the lower life forms does not mean that it is the normal or natural way to behave. What we see is an anomaly. I could go on … ]