J
johnnykins
Guest
I agreed - but not any more either - as far as I can tellYou may not have noticed, but Fr. David is a priest in good standing, so his opinion carries at least as much weight as those at the other parishes you mentioned.
because that’s true because it is unnecessary - you should have chosen your word and example betterThat being said, I promise you that I can scour the Internet and find two (Roman Catholic in good standing) parishes that agree that kneeling is unnecessary,
probably a few Bishops, tootwo parishes that agree that Nancy Pelosi can receive Communion,
I can think of a Cardinal myself - not to mention many outside the USA where it is no question at alland two parishes that agree that liturgical dancing is a good idea.
Actually it does support that claim if not prove it. More importantly, it at least doesn’t prove that the Church doesn’t condone or approve those things.That doesn’t provide any proof that the Church condones or approves it, does it now?
NOW
I promise you that I can scour the world and find one priest (Roman Catholic in good standing) that agrees that Extra Ecclesia Nulla Salus means exactly what Fr Feeney said it did and he was right to protest his silencing by Archbishop Cushing like he did, one priest that agrees that Archbishop Lefebvre was right to go into schism, and one priest that agrees that the removal of Edgardo Mortara from his family was a good idea. That doesn’t provide any proof that the Church condones or approves it, does it now?
(BTW I DO NOT believe Fr David holds any of those positions - the entire point it to make clear the absurdity of your prior post)