First, the Church doesn’t “make up” rules. The laws of fasting come from God; how they are applied is the task of the Church. (Matt. 16:18-19)
The entire Holy Tradition comes from God, and it is the role of the Churchas our instructor to teach us how to apply these things in our lives. The Church’s requirements are not all that onerous; I imagine that most serious readers of the Bible fast more than twice a year and do penances more than once a week.
The Church simply gets us all together by providing days when we all do this together, since there is great grace poured out when everyone does it together.
I can understand that it’s nice to worship together and it can be very edifying.
What I’m saying is twofold:
- It IS the church dictating when and how to fast. Jesus only said that one is to fast. One is to fast when one is doing so for spiritual reasons - not because the church says to.
Mathew 6:16 Jesus says WHEN we fast, so He did expect his disciples, and by extension us, to fast. He did not mention a specific time.
Plus, I wouldn’t call not eating meat on any particular day “fasting.” It’s pretty hypocritical actually. To replace meat with fish is nonsense. Fasting means NOT EATING so that one could pray and think about God and spiriitual matters. Replacing meat with fish OR eliminating meat altogether is not biblical fasting.
If the person is fasting for the correct reason, and not because the church has laid down this rule, then I believe something will be gained from it.
- If the church DOES want to impose this rule, that could be fine too. But at the expense of it being a MORTAL sin if one does not adhere??
Yes. This is going too far.
The serious readers of the bible fast because they want to, not because they are told to.
I agree that the church is the instructor on how to apply biblical principles, so:
The instruction should be proper. True fasting should be taught.
It should act as an “instructor” and not as a condemner.
Other than by means of the Tradition, how do you propose that we follow Jesus? The following and the Tradition are one and the same thing - the difference is in whether you are inventing your own, or following what was given by the Apostles.
The question to end all questions. The great divide.
Tradition is good, but it MUST adhere to biblical principles or we go way out of line. This is a perfect example. Something good is taken, and turned into a man-made rule with dire consequences if not followed.
Mathew 15:3
"And He answered and said to them, "Why do you yourselves transgress the commandment of God for the sake of your tradition? "
In the above verse, Jesus was telling the pharisees that His disciples could ignore the tradition of men because it was not scriptural. He was referring here to the washing of hands, but it could refer to anything when done by rote instead of with spirituality.
I believe the church is changing in this regard - in following the spirit of the law instead of the letter of the law. Jesus elevated everything to the spiritual.
GG