Meat: What you don't know can kill you

  • Thread starter Thread starter Marfran
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Only problem is that, usually, organic foods cost more and have been proven to be no healther than non-organic foods.

Here is a report of the study, Organic food not healthier, study finds.

So what are you really paying for when you buy organic foods? Also, is there a standard as to what “organic” really means?
Well we do know it is healthier for the planet!

I find buying from the farmers market actually cheaper by me - the fruit isn’t as ‘pretty’ the veggies not all the same size - but I know I’m supporting local business and not contributing to the problems.
 
The feedlot feeding of cows will kill them because they need hay or grass to keep everything in balance. Feeding them all that grain throws their system out of balance.

The other thing that happens as a result of the heavy grainfeeding is that their Omega-3s turn into Omega-6s. The former are good for us, the latter bad for us.
That is something I didn’t know about - do you have any additional information on the Omega-3 issue?
 
No, I think we are talking about two different things.

First: Is it “wrong” for the food industry to contaminated food? Yes. If you want to talk about ways you can ensure they don’t, that could be a separate conversation I think. Included in that discussion might be penalties for unsafe practices or penalties for those who don’t maintain proper sanitation. I would be very surprised if we don’t already have something like that, and a huge bureaucracy standing by to send form letters all over the place, and probably two overworked inspectors who can’t be everywhere at once.

Second, you get food from the store; you don’t know where it came from, who handled it, or how. You don’t know if it is full of e-coli, or it has none, but you DO KNOW that cooking it properly will make it safe even if it has e-coli in it. You’re the parent, your kid is hungry… what do you do? Cook it properly, or serve it rare?

THAT is what I’m saying is the parent’s responsibility and if the kids are old enough to be out at the mall eating food on their own, it is their responsibility to ensure their own safety. They don’t get a pass because someone else - who might not even have been aware of it - contaminated their food. I would feel differently if there was no way they could ensure their own safety, but such is not the case.

This stuff isn’t new. Same arguments we had in the USA a hundred years ago with cow’s milk. Could be safe, could not be safe… what to do? No problem, your government will solve it for you. ALL commercially sold milk will be pasteurized. Next problem.
At the risk of posting another video that people can’t open - youtube.com/watch?v=VIjanhKqVC4 - WARNING - this is a strong on called “Meet your Meat” - that goes over the CAFO problems —

The government does not seem interested in taking the necessary steps to change the practices of Factory Farms - it is up to us to insist that changes happen.
 
Right, it is found in the intestines and feces of cattle.

When it gets into the meat it means that the meat has been contaminated. It is not normally found in the meat. It was found in the meat of the processing plant that is discussed in this video.

So what do you want to discuss about this contamination? I have yet to see any substantive discussion about it, other than eating meat is bad.
organicconsumers.org/irrad/patties.cfm
An estimated 89% of US beef ground into patties contains some E. coli 0157:H7

I would like to see us advocating for a change in the way cattle are raised - grass fed - not corn feed in CAFO’s
 
Actually it is about the cooking as proper cooking would kill the ecoli that caused the illness that the child died of.
You asked a question - what is it that you would like to discuss on this topic —

Marfran answers that it is what the cattle are fed - and you dismiss it by saying = just cook it better -

Do you believe that there should be a change in the way cattle are raised for food? Or should we just continue to produce cattle in CAFO’s fed on corn where they no produce higher and higher amounts of e-coli t***hat doesn’t just get into the ground beef but into the ground water as well? ***
 
Part of the problem now is the type of corn they’re fed. The corn that cows and people in the US eat now isn’t “natural” corn. Its genetically altered, so that there is almost no germ left, and it consists almost entirely of sugar. So while once upon a time when a cow ate corn it was eating a natural grain. Today, its basically eating sugar cubes. They get fat quickly with this sort of feeding, and they’re intestinal tact starts deteriorating, and infections become more likely.
Your source for this? I know many people who grow corn on contract for feed companies and I can tell you they are not out there splitting DNA in their fields. They plant the same seed from the same company they planted in the 1950s. They don’t care how much sugar it puts out, they care about how much they can grow in an acre and how much it costs to keep it watered properly.
but I have heard that they feed them too much corn, and that if they didn’t slaughter them when they do, that they would die anyways. Do you know anything about this? Otherwise, great points.
Yes, in fact I do. If you fed cattle the same diet they use in a fishishing lot, starting when they were weaned, you have have an enormously fat cow in more ways than one. It would look like a blimp with legs, and probably would not stay healthy very long. That’s why they are only the diet for 4-6 weeks. Before that time, when they are growing to weight and grazing on grass, you don’t want them fat, you want them healthy and strong. Meat from a cow like that tastes terrible, so before they go to meat, they have to be fattened up but in a proportionate way. It’s not like they’re giving them a bucket full of donuts just to fatten up - it’s a very specific, scientifically formulated diet. And yes corn is used. If genetically altered corn is used, I don’t know, I don’t know anyone growing the stuff, but I would point out that feed and feed stuff (ingredients of feed) are regulated and you can’t just toss in whatever you feel like it.

Suppose you had 100 parakeets each worth about $1,200. You going to let someone just waltz in with a new “seed” and let him give it to your parakeets? No way. Neither will finishers. The market is volatile and harsh enough as it is, it’s a HUGE gamble, and no one is going to do something to shave a few bucks (while risking tens of thousands) without some sound science behind it.
I’m sure that the parents wouldn’t find the title of the thread misleading - it was what they didn’t know that took the lives of their children - the contaminated hamburger.
Contamination wasn’t mentioned in the title, that’s all I said. I’m sure they are emotionally attached to the issue as I would be if it were my child. I’m not them. I contend the hamburger did not kill them, the contamination did, and it would have been a non-issue if it were cooked properly. Therefore I see blame not only on the contaminator, but on the cook. Both, not just one.
Not wanting to take the discussion to far afield: I do want to weigh in on your comment about the green onions and baby spinach - they were able to trace the source of the E. coli & Salmonella-contaminats in both these cases, as well as other veggie contamination to CAFO’s
Well I hope your basis for that is a source other than the general contamination statement you posted, given that the source of the Green Onion contamination was in Mexico. What is your solution to the food problem, should we do away with all beef and other food animals? Do you think that will end food contamination?
I would like to see us advocating for a change in the way cattle are raised - grass fed - not corn feed in CAFO’s
Please tell me your definition for what constitutes, exactly, “a CAFO.” I don’t know what precisely you mean by that term, and it can have wide differences in definition. As I have detailed in previous posts, most all cattle ARE grass raised, it is only in the last month they are fattened in a pattern and proportion that gives the best quality (grade) to the meat.

So… if you want to stop corn feeding, you have to do the following first.
  1. Convince the people who have been feeding corn for finishing for at least 100 years they are doing something unsafe.
  2. Convince the USDA to alter their meat grading scale, OR get all meat customers, individuals, restaurants, etc. to accept a lower grade product, all while making the same profit.
  3. Convince meat processors that they can buy skinny, bad-tasting meat and everyone will buy it anyways.
  4. Finishers really have little to do with it. They only exist because processors won’t buy skinny cows that taste bad, so fix #3 and you eliminate #4.
  5. Producers would LOVE to see you make these changes. Now we don’t have to pay someone else up to 20% of our profit to fatten up our strong, healthy cows. We don’t have to be as careful with what we do to them (innoculations, medicines, etc.) because we don’t have to keep later finishing in mind.
Just for everyone’s info, I am not against making changes. I am not against sound practices like sanitation and keeping contamination out of food, ALL foods. The only reason I’ve bothered to post half a book in this thread is because I hear this kind of accusation all the time, and frankly it is to me just like the “you Catholics are over there worshipping Mary” is to Catholics. It demonstrates by just saying “corn feeding cows is dangerous” that you have no idea what you’re talking about. If it was dangerous, we would have a history dating back to the 1800s of the same problems, but we DON’T. It isn’t corn, folks. Genetically altered corn? Maybe so. When we can see the trail straight from the genetics lab to the crop to the finishing house to the problem in the meat aisle, then I will believe it, but I’ve been watching the topic for years and have never seen it proven. Accusations? Oh they are all over, but proof? Where is it?

It’s always some one with a camera sneaking into a facility that is grossly in violation and that is presented as “how the industry is.” Okay, then if that be so, how’s it feel to be a Christian like Rev. Phelps is a “Christian.” Does he represent the Christianity of you? Those films don’t represent me or anyone I do business with. I want the best, healthiest beef I can provide, it’s what God has given me talent to do. People I deal with are like minded and would never put anyone at risk for a buck. I’ve shot cows when I couldn’t prove them healthy or healed at market time, and sucked up the loss when I could have made a few hundred bucks and hoped people use a thermometer when they cook. So yes, I get offended when the entire industry is tossed in with the nastiest among us.

So I’ll rest my posting in this topic with that. Thanks for reading.
 
…but I’ve been watching the topic for years and have never seen it proven. Accusations? Oh they are all over, but proof? Where is it?
Well something is obviously wrong, and a lot of experts are saying that it is all in the corn. Maybe it’s just the massive factory atmosphere of it all. Maybe instead of pushing production to higher and higher levels, we started re-thinking our food production ways, and return to simpler farming methods.

Should any child have to die from eating food???

Here’s an interesting article I found in an organic farming journal. It’s about the dairy cows that they turn into hamburger: purefood.org/madcow/dairy1504.cfm
 
And that’s your right to do so. I have to wonder, though, if you aren’t interested in hearing about these things or changing your diet at all, why the high level of activity in threads like this?
In the current climate it is very easy for thinkig like yours to get in policy making decisions, and quite frankly that scares me to byond death. I could pay lots more in insurance just because of what I will and won’t eat. The drvie me nuts factor is how much people expect other to carteblache throwout tradition and traditional thinking quicker than the drop of a dime. That just amazes me.
 
I want the best, healthiest beef I can provide, it’s what God has given me talent to do. People I deal with are like minded and would never put anyone at risk for a buck. I’ve shot cows when I couldn’t prove them healthy or healed at market time, and sucked up the loss when I could have made a few hundred bucks and hoped people use a thermometer when they cook. So yes, I get offended when the entire industry is tossed in with the nastiest among us.

So I’ll rest my posting in this topic with that. Thanks for reading.
I’d like to start by saying that I do believe you that you do indeed work to provide the best beef you can. You believe that you are not the exception, because your choices make sense to you both ethically and as a business person. However I do not believe all business persons who are in agribusiness are as ethical.

I’m sure that if I were in your shoes it would be difficult to have people not in your business discussing this issue, or to suggest that choosing not to eat meat is a reflection of their faith ---- all this being said I appreciate the time you took on this thread to share your perspective, and being open to discussing this.

I think it may be possible that there are good and bad in every walk of life.
I also think greed has made some entire businesses make compromises to make the most money - and from what I understand this is where the issue of the corn comes in… ag.ndsu.edu/pubs/ansci/beef/as1238w.htm - I always enjoy learning on these threads by what others post and by what I go looking into on my own.
Peace
 
In the current climate it is very easy for thinkig like yours to get in policy making decisions, and quite frankly that scares me to byond death. I could pay lots more in insurance just because of what I will and won’t eat. The drvie me nuts factor is how much people expect other to carteblache throwout tradition and traditional thinking quicker than the drop of a dime. That just amazes me.
I think it is possible that you may be adding 2 and 2 and coming up with banannas…😉
Advocating for better regulation in agribusines will benefit everyone - I’m not sure what traditional thinking you think people expect you to throw out — eating potential dangerous meat shouldn’t be a tradition for anyone.
 
I think it is possible that you may be adding 2 and 2 and coming up with banannas…😉
Advocating for better regulation in agribusines will benefit everyone - I’m not sure what traditional thinking you think people expect you to throw out — eating potential dangerous meat shouldn’t be a tradition for anyone.
This was inteneded to be an anti red meat thread and whether anyone want to admit it or not thats the way it is. Honestly I have never been sick from meat. But years ago back in my college days I got sick from bad rice twice, and had to quit eat rice from the cafeteria even though I like rice. Eating any potentially dangerous food isn’t a good idea, not just meat.
 
Not possible unless the cook is a cow!!! We are specifically talking about*** Escherichia coli O157:H7 ***here. This is only found in the intestines of cattle.
Again, we are specifically talking about ***Escherichia coli O157:H7 ***. Don’t confuse the issue.
Who exactly is confusing the issue?

Someone keeps trying to place the slaughterhouse as the responsibility for a cook not doing his job.

It is the cook’s responsibility to make certain the food is properly prepared.
 
Your child dies and it’s the restaurant’s fault–not the industry who utilizes practices that increase the liklihood of contamination…
EXACTLY.

It is not the job of the slaughterhouse, packager, or delivery service to prepare the food. It is the restaurant’s.
 
I’d like to start by saying that I do believe you that you do indeed work to provide the best beef you can. You believe that you are not the exception, because your choices make sense to you both ethically and as a business person. However I do not believe all business persons who are in agribusiness are as ethical.

I’m sure that if I were in your shoes it would be difficult to have people not in your business discussing this issue, or to suggest that choosing not to eat meat is a reflection of their faith ---- all this being said I appreciate the time you took on this thread to share your perspective, and being open to discussing this.

I think it may be possible that there are good and bad in every walk of life.
I also think greed has made some entire businesses make compromises to make the most money - and from what I understand this is where the issue of the corn comes in… ag.ndsu.edu/pubs/ansci/beef/as1238w.htm - I always enjoy learning on these threads by what others post and by what I go looking into on my own.
Peace
This is a good post. I agree.
 
I think it is possible that you may be adding 2 and 2 and coming up with bananas…😉
Advocating for better regulation in agribusines will benefit everyone - I’m not sure what traditional thinking you think people expect you to throw out — eating potential dangerous meat shouldn’t be a tradition for anyone.
OK–that banana quote is good–I have to remember that one!!!

Yeah, what’s traditional about children dying from E.coli tainted meat???
 
Yeah, what’s traditional about children dying from E.coli tainted meat???
There is nothing traditional about it.
But we have to ask ourselves who precisely is responsible for the tainted beef hitting the plate.

Once the actual responsibility is known, then we can define what exactly needs to be done.
 
OK–that banana quote is good–I have to remember that one!!!

Yeah, what’s traditional about children dying from E.coli tainted meat???
If you want to waste time lobbying for better meat, that is your choice (and I don’t know why you would as a vegetarian). As for me, I’m going to cook my meat right.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top