K
kalt
Guest
Respect for the dead.
National Geographic has something on tne Net called The Daily Dozen. Photographers of all skill levels can submit their photos to the site, and the best are picked to be included in the Dozen.
In the February - week 1 lot, there’s a photo that someone (maybe a medical student) took of a dead person’s hand. The person, or maybe her family, donated her body to help medical students or for other research. I can’t believe that this person or her family intended her body to be used by students as photography models, or that a student would take pictures for art’s sake and then post them on National Geographic’s site.
And shame on NG for accepting the photo!
ngm.nationalgeographic.com/your-shot/daily-dozen
There are no direct links to photos, unfortunately. Click on the right arrows next to the strip of pictures. There are two "hand’ pictures in the lot, and the cadaver hand is the 2nd in the lot. It’s dated February 2nd, I believe. The caption indentifies the hand as belonging to a cadaver and explains how an why he took the picture.
If this photo was taken by a med. student, he has a lot to learn about compassion and respect.
If that were my family member, I would do everything I could to have that student take a semester break to think about what he or she did.
She–Or is it he? The photographer was smart enough not to include his name–apparently thinks that the photograph is a visual ode to life and death. It would be nice if he had consent to do it.
If any family member thought that photos would be taken and published, I’m sure that they thought the photos would be used for legitimate educational purposes–education related to medicine or science, not visual arts!
It’s possible that the photographer had consent, but it’s not likely.
National Geographic has something on tne Net called The Daily Dozen. Photographers of all skill levels can submit their photos to the site, and the best are picked to be included in the Dozen.
In the February - week 1 lot, there’s a photo that someone (maybe a medical student) took of a dead person’s hand. The person, or maybe her family, donated her body to help medical students or for other research. I can’t believe that this person or her family intended her body to be used by students as photography models, or that a student would take pictures for art’s sake and then post them on National Geographic’s site.
And shame on NG for accepting the photo!
ngm.nationalgeographic.com/your-shot/daily-dozen
There are no direct links to photos, unfortunately. Click on the right arrows next to the strip of pictures. There are two "hand’ pictures in the lot, and the cadaver hand is the 2nd in the lot. It’s dated February 2nd, I believe. The caption indentifies the hand as belonging to a cadaver and explains how an why he took the picture.
If this photo was taken by a med. student, he has a lot to learn about compassion and respect.
If that were my family member, I would do everything I could to have that student take a semester break to think about what he or she did.
She–Or is it he? The photographer was smart enough not to include his name–apparently thinks that the photograph is a visual ode to life and death. It would be nice if he had consent to do it.
If any family member thought that photos would be taken and published, I’m sure that they thought the photos would be used for legitimate educational purposes–education related to medicine or science, not visual arts!
It’s possible that the photographer had consent, but it’s not likely.