Mehodists

  • Thread starter Thread starter IGotQuestions
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
I

IGotQuestions

Guest
Do Methodists believe in a Eucharist similar to the Catholic Church?
 
You’ll get a range of answers because they just don’t really define it very succintly. Otherwise, it’s a no (regarding transubstantiation). However they define the Real Presence very ambiguously. They may affirm some kind of spiritual presence of God in the Eucharist, but others may think it’s purely symbolic.

From the official UMC website
The Lord’s Supper (Holy Communion, Eucharist)

The Lord’s Supper, or Holy Communion, is the sacrifice of praise and thanksgiving the church offers for all God has done, is doing, and will do to save and renew the whole creation through Jesus Christ.
We offer ourselves and gifts of bread and wine, and we ask the Holy Spirit to bless us to be Christ’s body for the world, and the gifts to be for us the body and blood of Christ. We believe the Holy Spirit answers our prayers, “Yes!”
As we receive the bread and wine, we are nourished and empowered for God’s mission in the world.
The table around which we gather belongs to Christ. We invite all who love him, who earnestly repent of their sin and seek to be at peace with one another to offer themselves with us in praise and thanksgiving around the Lord’s table and receive his body and blood with us.

This may suggest they believe in it, but here is also a following:
" Do United Methodists believe the communion elements actually become the body and blood of Christ? “No, we believe that the change is spiritual. They signify the body and blood of Christ for us, helping us to be Christ’s body in the world today, redeemed by Christ’s blood. We pray over the bread and cup that they may make us one with Christ, “one with each other, and one in service to all the world.” (United Methodists and Communion brochure, archives.usmc.org)"

So they do, but not really. :confused:🤷
 
Do Methodists believe in a Eucharist similar to the Catholic Church?
It wouldn’t matter if they did. They don’t have valid Holy Orders. No line of Apostolic Succession. All valid Holy Orders can be traced back to Christ’s original 12 Apostles and ultimately to God on Earth when He gave the first Holy Orders. Anyone without Holy Orders in that line of Succession can not call on the Holy Spirit to turn the bread and wine into Christ’s Body and Blood.

To put it simply: even if they did, all they would have is bread and wine on their altars. Only a priest with valid Holy Orders can celebrate the Mass and consecrate the host.
 
Methodists are an offshoot of the Anglican Church and likewise have a variety of beliefs. Generally, Methodists do not believe in the same Sacramental Holy Orders and Eucharist as Catholics, but do have a type of Communion.
 
I never met a Methodist I didn’t like. They respect my desire to remain Catholic.
 
I never met a Methodist I didn’t like. They respect my desire to remain Catholic.
For the founders of different denominations, John Wesley is definitely the one I respect the most. In terms of how teaching is evolved into practice/life, Methodism is definitely one of the closest to Orthodox/Catholicism in my opinion.
 
For the founders of different denominations, John Wesley is definitely the one I respect the most. In terms of how teaching is evolved into practice/life, Methodism is definitely one of the closest to Orthodox/Catholicism in my opinion.
Yes. His writings and those of John Bunyan are the greatest of Protestantism.
 
From my experience, most Methodists believe that there is no change in the substance of the bread and wine at Communion.

This is obviously different from the Eucharist because during the Eucharist, the bread and wine are changed into the flesh and blood of Jesus.

One notable difference between Methodists and Catholics regarding communion is that the Methodist church allows all people to receive Communion, where as Catholics reserve the Eucharist only for Catholics in a state of grace (meaning there is no mortal sin on their soul).
 
From my experience, most Methodists believe that there is no change in the substance of the bread and wine at Communion.

This is obviously different from the Eucharist because during the Eucharist, the bread and wine are changed into the flesh and blood of Jesus.

One notable difference between Methodists and Catholics regarding communion is that the Methodist church allows all people to receive Communion, where as Catholics reserve the Eucharist only for Catholics in a state of grace (meaning there is no mortal sin on their soul).
Do Methodists invite non-Christians to Holy Communion?

I wonder if the Methodists’ difference from Catholics is due to a different view on the Eucharist, a different view on ecumenism, or a different view of the impact of “mortal” sin.

In the Catholic Church, perhaps another condition is that this Catholic not only is in the state of grace, but that they believe what the Church teaches about the Eucharist.
 
Plus the random Anglican.
And in 2015, there are literally hundreds of non-random Anglicans around.

(OK, forgive, forgive, year of Mercy and all that 🙂 )

Is there a special deliverance rite from sarcasm in the Book of Blessings?
 
And in 2015, there are literally hundreds of non-random Anglicans around.

(OK, forgive, forgive, year of Mercy and all that 🙂 )

Is there a special deliverance rite from sarcasm in the Book of Blessings?
Beats me.

I would categorize Anglicans as mostly random. Though I use another term, habitually. Being myself not random.
 
Do Methodists invite non-Christians to Holy Communion?

I wonder if the Methodists’ difference from Catholics is due to a different view on the Eucharist, a different view on ecumenism, or a different view of the impact of “mortal” sin.

In the Catholic Church, perhaps another condition is that this Catholic not only is in the state of grace, but that they believe what the Church teaches about the Eucharist.
The UMC will not turn anyone away from receiving communion. Anyone who wishes to lead a Christian life will be allowed to receive communion.

To your second inquiry, I would say all three are correct. Methodists don’t typically believe in transubstantiation or any variant thereof. To them, it is symbolic. The UMC also typically has a very friendly policy towards that of other faith traditions, so you are correct in saying that they have a different view of ecumenism. Lastly, I don’t think, to my knowledge, that Methodists differentiate between mortal and venial sins. To them, sin is sin.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top