D
dcmac
Guest
Mel did attest to his loyalty to the current pope during his interviews on EWTN with Raymond Arroyo’s show “The World Over”. Mel is not an SV. He simply follows the ancient rite of St. Pius V.
As I said, we can only go by what Mel has said and, in my opinion, he has not said enough to think that he is not Catholic. Yes he is a Catholic that only attends the Trad Latin Mass, but there is nothing wrong with that.
He has said a couple of things that puzzle me, but it is not enough.
So I agree that we shouldn’t “Mel’s reputation using innuendo and half-truths.” as you say but…
I also do not think we should over state the movie he made. Its not like he didn’t make a profit out of it. You say he made the movie at “great personal expense” but he also profited greatly from it.
In my opinion he has stared in some movies of questional content and protrayed some very questional characters.
Mel is a man like everyone else. Not perfect, a fallen being.
In hindsight, it was a profitable deal. But at the time he wrote the check for $30,000,000 it was a matter of religious conviction. He was willing to lose his entire investment for the sake of sharing his Faith.I also do not think we should over state the movie he made. Its not like he didn’t make a profit out of it. You say he made the movie at “great personal expense” but he also profited greatly from it.
Oh dear. I’m going to be guilty of one of those "I heard’ things that I just posted against… but I did hear that Mel is building a private family chapel and not a church. I don’t know if that makes a difference or not. I know that families in the past (and may in the present…I have no idea) had their own private chapels and it was prefectly ok.However, I read somewhere he is building a church where the TLM is celebrated. I’m not sure about if this is being done with the bishop’s approval and where the priests for this special church to come from (if they’re from the FSSP, OK.), so I’ll give him the benefit of the doubt.
Look, if anyone is going to post anything negative about Mel, please post PROOF. He’s doing a lot to promote the faith, and cutting him down (with false or unverifiable information) doesn’t help us one bit.
I’ll do the hearsay thing as well and say that I also heard it is a private chapel. He has a priest come and offer Mass there. I don’t know what kind of priest it is, but I “heard” it was an SSPX priest. But don’t quote me.Oh dear. I’m going to be guilty of one of those "I heard’ things that I just posted against… but I did hear that Mel is building a private family chapel and not a church. I don’t know if that makes a difference or not. I know that families in the past (and may in the present…I have no idea) had their own private chapels and it was prefectly ok.
dream wanderer
I saw an interview with him. He fully acknowledges the authority of the Pope and his local Bishop. Just because you don’t agree with him, is no reason to malign him, it is a SIN to do so.Is Mel-Gibson Catholic, the reason is because i have heard him talk bad about the pope, so is he?
This is a discussion group, not a gossip-spreading service.I’ll do the hearsay thing as well and say that I also heard. . . .
But don’t quote me.
I do know what I am talking about. I am talking about what I heard in interviews and other boards and I said so. I don’t know Mel, so I don’t know whether what I am talking about is factual or not. Since I fully disclosed my post as heresay and unsubstantiated, I am comfortable with my place in the universe.This is a discussion group, not a gossip-spreading service.
When you know what you’re talking about, THEN post. Because someone else will also say they heard several people say (blah blah blah) and pretty soon your gossip becomes “fact.”
Except those (I won’t name names, but have you looked in mirror lately?) who say they’re not sure, but they heard someone else say that he might be a member of a heretical group.None of us are out to bash Mel.
Respect for the reputation of persons forbids every attitude and word likely to cause them unjust injury. He becomes guilty:
- of rash judgment who, even tacitly, assumes as true, without sufficient foundation, the moral fault of a neighbor;
- of detraction who, without objectively valid reason, discloses another’s faults and failings to persons who did not know them;
- of calumny who, by remarks contrary to the truth, harms the reputation of others and gives occasion for false judgments concerning them
I try not to look in the mirror. I frighten easily.Except those (I won’t name names, but have you looked in mirror lately?) who say they’re not sure, but they heard someone else say that he might be a member of a heretical group.
**I saw an interview with him. He fully acknowledges the authority of the Pope and his local Bishop. Just because you don’t agree with him, is no reason to malign him, it is a SIN to do so.
Well now, its Mel’s Passion? I though it was Christ.Thats what ive heard. Thank God for Mel and his Passion !