I watched it last night. On my second viewing, my opinion of it is slightly lower. It feels too cinematic, what with the occasional slow-motion, and Gibson took artistic license a little too far. Main example of that: why did the robber crucified next to Jesus get his eye pecked out by a crow? Did he really need to clarify that he wasn’t a good person?
It is a choice. God tells us we have free will. One of the two men chose to follow Christ, and one rebuked any form of wanting to follow him.
His choice was not as beautiful as the other. You can not rebuke the lords desire to want you near, and expect beautification.
as far as cinimatic differences, i am really not educated in the differences to say anything other than i loved the movie because of the message i learned, and what it did for me speritually.
My son died on January 9th, 2004…just before the theatrical oppening of this movie. We had planned this outing where we were both excited to see this movie together. He was just a few weeks prior to his 19th birthday when he passed away.
It was hard for me to watch for two different reasons. One, i had just lost a son, and how deep the paralelled similarities for a mother to watch her son do the right thing, yet suffer so deeply. Two, the original reasons for the movie…to bring the message to those of us that take for granted, or forget the awsome debth of his love for us, that he would die for us. Not just die, but die horribly and painfully, and not give up on his prommise, or his trust in his father’s guidence.
My son was terminal for many years, but dealing with longevity, you would be surprised how very wise anyone is when they address life with responsibility. Responsibility for their own destiny, soul, and the lives they filter out into. Yes, he was close to God, and he lived a normal teenagers life, loved dramma and religion, and fought for air daily with love oxygen levels.
But he moved forward knowing God did it, and so should he. He should do the best he could with each and every day…“carpe diem” was often written and lived by him…And yes, not being presumptious, but i did find many things in Mother Marys story that made me realize i had a champion of compassion on my side…as she too lost a son that was trying to do the right thing daily. I did not feel alone…like the only one who lost a son.
Truly, i felt her expressed pain of helpfulness…
i21.photobucket.com/albums/b282/Lanasshoebox/72.jpg
I tell you this Scott, cinamatography is not a big enough reason to boycott this or any other movie. Look at LOTR’s first cartoon…ahhhh sad by our standards, yet we loved the tale. A story is what you make of it, and i find it odd that such a story os Jesus’s passion, in any cinimatograpy format would not do more justice being watched and praised for the strengths first. It is not wrong to disagree by any means, but i think the educated guess, be it a friend or not, should not form such an oppinion for you…you trust deeply and you just might be missing something, for there is good and bad in everything.
Just as there is good in what you say, and we respect it. But without an educated oppinion from your own eyes, how “do” you expect to be held in company who HAS seen it. Education is important first hand, and after all, it is your name you are putting on this oppinion of others about OUR Lord.
I would never trust others to do such a thing for me.
Lana