A
adelore
Guest
Are there any men here that wear their hats in Mass? If you don’t or do wear your hat in Mass, could you please tell us why you do or don’t?
:banghead:i made a guy takes his off at mass this easter. he was there with his girlfriend and was refusing to take it off. his reasoning was that if the ladies could wear theres then he could wear his.
Good maners never go out of style. When I was a child men would tip their hats as they passed a catholic Church, out of respect for the Blessed SacramentPerhaps it’s old school, but I was taught that good manners dictated that men’s hats came off when inside, especially in church. The military also requires the same thing.
:
1 Be ye followers of me, as I also am of Christ. 2 Now I praise you, brethren, that in all things you are mindful of me: and keep my ordinances as I have delivered them to you. 3 But I would have you know, that the head of every man is Christ; and the head of the woman is the man; and the head of Christ is God. 4 Every man praying or prophesying with his head covered, disgraceth his head. 5 But every woman praying or prophesying with her head not covered, disgraceth her head: for it is all one as if she were shaven.
Highlighting mine.6 For if a woman be not covered, let her be shorn. But if it be a shame to a woman to be shorn or made bald, let her cover her head. 7 The man indeed ought not to cover his head, because he is the image and glory of God; but the woman is the glory of the man. 8 For the man is not of the woman, but the woman of the man. 9 For the man was not created for the woman, but the woman for the man. 10 Therefore ought the woman to have a power over her head, because of the angels.
I am sorry, but do you even have to ask?Are there any men here that wear their hats in Mass? If you don’t or do wear your hat in Mass, could you please tell us why you do or don’t?
Funny how often this comes up.
St. Paul in his First Letter to the Corinthians, 11:1-10
drbo.org/chapter/53011.htm
I just want to say that it has always seemed odd to me that the church dropped the rule of ‘head coverings for women in church’ with the 1983 Code of Canon Law but men are still expected to not wear hats in church. But I suppose that is the proverbial can of worms.:
1 Be ye followers of me, as I also am of Christ. 2 Now I praise you, brethren, that in all things you are mindful of me: and keep my ordinances as I have delivered them to you. 3 But I would have you know, that the head of every man is Christ; and the head of the woman is the man; and the head of Christ is God. 4 Every man praying or prophesying with his head covered, disgraceth his head.
i made a guy takes his off at mass this easter. he was there with his girlfriend and was refusing to take it off. his reasoning was that if the ladies could wear theres then he could wear his.
I told a young male to remove his Steelers hat at Mass. This was on Superbowl Sunday. I just politely mention that you are in Mass and he removed it.
So ‘Western Culture’ / ‘our American etiquette/manners system’ wins over what St. Paul wrote? To quote Pope Benedict, ‘An adult faith does not follow the waves of fashion and the latest novelty’. (I admit i nicked this from benedictgal’s sigWearing a hat is not JUST Church rules.
It’s also part of our Western Culture, and our American etiquette/manners system.
No, it doesn’t.So ‘Western Culture’ / ‘our American etiquette/manners system’ wins over what St. Paul wrote? To quote Pope Benedict, ‘An adult faith does not follow the waves of fashion and the latest novelty’. (I admit i nicked this from benedictgal’s sig)
Hmm, I think I wasn’t concentrating when I wrote that reply, my apologies.No, it doesn’t.
It can supplement St. Paul’s writing.
But, didn’t St. Paul agree that men shouldn’t wear hats while praying?
Plus, I wouldn’t call a few-hundred years old style/etiquette guideline “novelty”.
Hmm, I think I wasn’t concentrating when I wrote that reply, my apologies.
What I mean, in essence, is that St. Paul does say that women should not pray or prophesy with their heads uncovered. We do not currently (in general) follow or enforce this rule. Also, general reasoning for this is that ‘Western Culture’ / ‘our American etiquette/manners system’ has adapted/changed over the last couple of centuries so that there are no implications (for want of a better term) if a woman has her head uncovered in public, and St. Paul’s teaching on this simply reflected views from his time. So I do understand why the rule was not in the 1983 Canon.
My point, then, is that by the same logic we ought to conclude that if ‘Western Culture’ / ‘our American etiquette/manners system’ accepts men wearing hats indoors this should be allowed in church?
**
No problem!
I would say the “heads uncovered” (in general society) has been one of the many great things our culture/society has lost, and it’s for the worse. When flip-flops, jean shorts, and a tshirt pass for “OK” in public wear, society dies a little.
I would say that St. Paul trumps all, and societal roles would take a back seat to St. Paul, but I would argue that nowadays, with “high society” and “typical” society, hats indoors for men is still a no-no. It’s a travesty my generation and younger do not see it that way.
I severely disagree with men wearing hats indoors, and I really have no preference for veiling. I see a few things in line ahead of “veiling” priority-wise, one of which is the increased/expanded usage of the EF. However, I do support women that veil/headcover.