T
tuffsmurf
Guest
That’s where I could see problems coming with pregnancy and childbirth during military service.
Rape is also common during peace. In some parts of the world more than others.Rape is actually very common in wars.
The Church does not have any teaching on menstruation or its suppression. This is a medical decision, not a moral one.Are these justifiable reasons to suppress menstruation? Would it make a difference whether the woman in question was married or single?
The principe is double effect would be the moral principle here.If a female soldier who took such a measure were deployed someplace where she ran the risk of being raped, how would the potentially abortifacient effect in the event of rape and impregnation square morally?
Tuffsmurf spelled out details but our point is the same. I think! Hormonal birth control and iuds can have very bad effects on the body.27lw:
You dare. But, I’m not sure there is much merit to the contention, unlike the points made by tuffsmurf.Dare I say that this is just one great reason that women ought not to be in combat roles?
I can’t speak for astronauts, but I can say that in the military there is no expectation that women won’t menstruate normally on deployment. I’m not a woman so I’m sure it’s not the most convenient thing, but thousands and thousands of women have managed.I have never heard of this. Sounds very urban legendy.
Seems extreme to me. Maybe on some remote outpost in the Korengal Valley, sure. But a big FOB or airbase like Al Asad or Bagram? No issue.Seems like a bunch of reasons women shouldn’t be in combat zones.
I can’t speak for the Army, but I spent 21 years in the Marine Corps and never heard of this. I am guessing most women Marines use contraception for the same reasons that most civilian women do.Read the link in my post (post seven).
It’s pretty clear that the army would like women to use contraception for deployment readiness.
Not so long that I don’t have a good idea what’s going on. I still have friends in, and, while we don’t discuss menses very often, I do keep generally abreast of policy. I have not heard of this one.Yeah, well, how long ago were you in the Marines? Did you read the link? That is the current information.
You don’t think that this is trying to persuade women soldiers to take contraception?27lw:
Not so long that I don’t have a good idea what’s going on. I still have friends in, and, while we don’t discuss menses very often, I do keep generally abreast of policy. I have not heard of this one.Yeah, well, how long ago were you in the Marines? Did you read the link? That is the current information.
Yes, I read the link, but it seems like medical information about contraception to me. Pretty mundane stuff. You seem to think its the leading edge of some kind of conspiracy to force contraceptives on people.
No. I think its medical advice, from one medical professional. Its not Army policy or a directive of any kind. Its also more than five years old.You don’t think that this is trying to persuade women soldiers to take contraception?
It’s the very first paragraph!