B
billcu1
Guest
I watched the new pope Fancis offer his first blessing and he prayed for an indulgence and remission of sin. Does that have the act of an absolution? Or does one still need to see the priest?
AwesomeI am gobsmacked. Had something weighing on my mind for some time, and finally plucked up the courage to go to confession this morning. I later came back through a snowstorm to have mass at 6.00pm, during which the priest announced that white smoke had gone up. If you ever needed hope…

No it was not absolution as in Absolution of Sins in the Sacrament…I watched the new pope Fancis offer his first blessing and he prayed for an indulgence and remission of sin. Does that have the act of an absolution? Or does one still need to see the priest?
I haven’t actually watched his blessing. I have just been getting the news on this forum. I didn’t know it mattered if you actually witnessed the blessing or not as long as you are faithful and in communion with the church. I think you have met the requirements personally Pax, but does anyone else have any insight?I watched the blessing of Pope Francis as it was streamed on EWTN on my computer at work. I work at a school…while our Holy Father was giving the blessing classes dismissed for the day with a ton of noise in the hallway, my boss asked me a question, my grandson (who goes to the school) flew into my office and showed me something he got in a class today…I was trying to pay attention to the blessing as best I could and made the sign of the cross when he did that part of the blessing.
I went to confession and Holy Communion over the weekend and have been praying for Pope Francis all day…do you think I have met the requirements for the indulgence (in view of all that was going on as I watched the blessing)?
Not to go all grammar crazy, it is just Pope Francis. There has to be a second to be called before he is called the firstWhen Pope Francis I gave his blessing tonight,
ha ha ha true - but when the news first stated his name they used Pope Fancis INot to go all grammar crazy, it is just Pope Francis. There has to be a second to be called before he is called the first
True, I also saw His Holiness Fancis I, SJha ha ha true - but when the news first stated his name they used Pope Fancis I
It has been clarifed - just Pope FrancisTrue, I also saw His Holiness Fancis I, SJ
Please see my earlier reply to this thread…It has been clarifed - just Pope Francis
As Fr Lombardi said today: “It will become Francis I after we have a Francis II,”
Not to go all grammar crazy, it is just Pope Francis. There has to be a second to be called before he is called the first