T
tafan
Guest
To the OP, it does appear the priests were correct, according to Canon law; but I do not understand the law also.
From the CCC
Since the effect of the sacrament is both healing of the soul and potential healing of the body, why is it reserved for those who have reached the age of reason. Yes, a baptized infant does not need healing of the soul, I certainly understnad that. But why not have the opportunity for healing of the body?
I would love some of our experts to address the OP’s concern along these lines.
From the CCC
(boldness added)1520 A particular gift of the Holy Spirit. the first grace of this sacrament is one of strengthening, peace and courage to overcome the difficulties that go with the condition of serious illness or the frailty of old age. This grace is a gift of the Holy Spirit, who renews trust and faith in God and strengthens against the temptations of the evil one, the temptation to discouragement and anguish in the face of death.134 This assistance from the Lord by the power of his Spirit is meant to lead the sick person to healing of the soul, but also of the body if such is God’s will.135 Furthermore, "if he has committed sins, he will be forgiven."136
Since the effect of the sacrament is both healing of the soul and potential healing of the body, why is it reserved for those who have reached the age of reason. Yes, a baptized infant does not need healing of the soul, I certainly understnad that. But why not have the opportunity for healing of the body?
I would love some of our experts to address the OP’s concern along these lines.