A
addictedkoala
Guest
I’m visiting my mother this weekend and thus had to go out to an unknown parish for confession. We went into the confessional and I told him my mortal sins and their number, then he gave some advice, then my act of contrition, followed by absolution. Now, I know I did my minimum part in confession, but I’m confused on the priests part. Try to follow me here if you can…
I know the bare minimum for absolution is, “I absolve you from your sins in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit” and I’m assuming that a slight variation on this using synonyms that don’t change the meaning at all are ok. Now, what happened was the priest said, “I grant you that forgiveness” and then told me to make my act of contrition. However, afterwards the prayer of absolution was not the standard one. Finally, he did do the “in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit” accompanied by the sign of the cross with his hand.
I would have asked him about it but it didn’t occur to me before I was driving home. To me, it would seem valid (however illicit) since “I grant you that forgiveness” does not change the “I” and “grant you forgiveness” may as well be the definition of absolve, and the priest invoked the trinity. Now, I may be stretching logic here since the words I am justifying it with are split, and not technically in the right place. Also, psychologically, I really want to be able to receive Christ this week which is why I made this thread so I can get some (name removed by moderator)ut.
*Note, I do think that proper words/form of absolution are needed and I will not presume on God’s mercy when a priest totally changes things up. Here I am using equivalent meaning as a reason, not God doesn’t care how it’s done.
I know the bare minimum for absolution is, “I absolve you from your sins in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit” and I’m assuming that a slight variation on this using synonyms that don’t change the meaning at all are ok. Now, what happened was the priest said, “I grant you that forgiveness” and then told me to make my act of contrition. However, afterwards the prayer of absolution was not the standard one. Finally, he did do the “in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit” accompanied by the sign of the cross with his hand.
I would have asked him about it but it didn’t occur to me before I was driving home. To me, it would seem valid (however illicit) since “I grant you that forgiveness” does not change the “I” and “grant you forgiveness” may as well be the definition of absolve, and the priest invoked the trinity. Now, I may be stretching logic here since the words I am justifying it with are split, and not technically in the right place. Also, psychologically, I really want to be able to receive Christ this week which is why I made this thread so I can get some (name removed by moderator)ut.
*Note, I do think that proper words/form of absolution are needed and I will not presume on God’s mercy when a priest totally changes things up. Here I am using equivalent meaning as a reason, not God doesn’t care how it’s done.