B
benedictgal
Guest
Vatican Radio has just reported that we now have a date for the implementation of the New Roman Missal translation: November 27, 2011 for the United States.
So First Sunday of Advent 2011 as expected. I’m confident that that will be the date for Canada as well.Vatican Radio has just reported that we now have a date for the implementation of the New Roman Missal translation: November 27, 2011 for the United States.
Preparation and catechesis ought to begin right now; one can only imagine what will happen if there’s a repeat of Missale Romanum. One can also imagine, quite frankly, that the more strident critics of the new translation (remember the “what if we just said wait” business?) will drag their feet in order to maximize the bow shock, hoping that a fusillade of articles predicting problems combined with poor catechesis will produce actual problems and force a reversal. So start telling people right away, start nudging them (because many people don’t know this is happening) that this is happening, and help get the changes in front of them. The USCCB website has many useful resources, most useful of all being the full order of Mass. Also, I have a chart showing the changes in the people’s parts that—at risk of immodesty—I think is an improvement on USCCB’s, insofar as it presents the new and old translations alongside the authoritative latin text; that’s here, and I’ve received compliments about it.Good news!
Now, question:
Does this mean we will begin practicing the new translation on the First Sunday of 2011. or are we going to know it before then? In other words, when will parishes in the U.S. begin practicing with their parishioners?
I envision everyone standing there with brand new missals reading along for the first six months or so. At least, that’s my plan. Speaking of which, I wonder when the new missals will come out. I’ve got an Amazon gift card waiting specifically for that purpose.Good news!
Now, question:
Does this mean we will begin practicing the new translation on the First Sunday of 2011. or are we going to know it before then? In other words, when will parishes in the U.S. begin practicing with their parishioners?
I beat you by an hour, Simon. You should have read my breaking news thread.It will go into effect on the first sunday in Advent 2011.
We use missalettes so I can’t justify the cost of a new missal.I envision everyone standing there with brand new missals reading along for the first six months or so. At least, that’s my plan. Speaking of which, I wonder when the new missals will come out. I’ve got an Amazon gift card waiting specifically for that purpose.
I really hope so too.So First Sunday of Advent 2011 as expected. I’m confident that that will be the date for Canada as well.
I’m fairly confident it will be
Yes.Are copies available now?
You can download it hereWe use missalettes so I can’t justify the cost of a new missal.
That would be a horrible mistake that will only sow confusion and anger among the faithful.Besides, with a Nov. 2011 implementation date, I don’t expect to see any diocisan education program here until at least then.
This is exactly the kind of thing that leads me to be cynical about the willingness of the critics to be humble, gracious, and obedient. No one should have written that article, and no diocese should have published it. The new translation has been a done deal for quite some time; the only reason to criticize it is, again, to sow confusion and anger among the faithful.We already had an article in the diocisan CCE newsletter about how the new translation makes it harder for people to understand the Mass and is a step backwards.
It will not be optional, as I understand it. It will be required for use in all dioceses starting next fall on the first sunday in advent.I can’t imagine it being widely used, let alone required in our diocese for several years.
My apologies; you did indeed and I should have.I beat you by an hour, Simon. You should have read my breaking news thread.
Thank you and benedictgal for the great news of the start date.It will go into effect on the first sunday in Advent 2011.
It’s not only a better translation of the latin, it makes clear that this prayer is rooted in Christ’s encounter with the centurion. (This change doesn’t affect me because I say it in latin anyway.)Here are some of the changes that will … be made: … “Lord, I am not worthy to receive you” will become “Lord, I am not worthy that you should enter under my roof”
He is a God of power and might, to be sure, and that’s not a bad prayer—but what it isn’t is the sanctus, which says “Holy, Holy, Holy Lord God of hosts.” And as with the domine non sum dignus, the 1973 mistranslation obscures the scriptural root of the prayer (in this case, in Isaiah)."Holy, holy, holy Lord, God of power and might’’ will become "Holy, Holy, Holy is the Lord God of hosts.’’
This isn’t actually a change. The 1973 translation correctly renders it “sins,” but it seems all-but ubiquitously misspoken, particularly when singing. This is a splendid opportunity to help people get it right.“You take away the sin of the world” becomes “You take away the sins of the world” because the Latin peccata is plural.
Not quite. The option “Christ has died, Christ has risen, Christ will come again" has been deleted. The option " Dying you destroyed our death, rising you restored our life. Lord Jesus, come in glory" has been re-translated as “We proclaim your death, O Lord, and profess your Resurrection until you come again.”The Acclamation “Christ has died, Christ has risen, Christ will come again" will become “We proclaim your death, O Lord, and profess your resurrection until you come." This again follows the Latin.
Which, again, makes clearer the scriptural root of the prayer, in this case Psalm 113.From Eucharistic Prayer III, “From age to age you gather a people to yourself, so that from east to west a perfect offering may be made to the glory of your name" will become “…you never cease to gather a people to yourself, so that from the rising of the sun to its setting a pure oblation may be offered to your name”
Some priests habitually omit the preface. Like the agnus dei, this is an opportunity to correct that for the future without having to say they’re doing anything wrong now.The introduction to the Our Father currently is “Jesus taught us to call God our Father, and so we have the courage to say." It will become “Taught by commands that bring salvation and formed by the divine instruction, we have the courage to say.”
Which is a much better translation, and many priests seem to instinctively use “behold” already. The latin is “ecce”—always and everywhere translated into English as “behold.” Always and everywhere, that is, except by the ICEL. Why they felt free to improvise new prayers roughly in the spirit of the actual text is beyond me.“This is the Lamb of God who takes away the sins of the world. Happy are those who are called to his supper" will change slightly to “Behold the Lamb of God who takes away the sins of the world. Blessed are those who are called to his supper."