A
andrewstx
Guest
Two more sites on domionsim:
www.reilgioustolerance.org/reconstru.htm
www.theocracywatch.org/dominionism/htm
www.reilgioustolerance.org/reconstru.htm
www.theocracywatch.org/dominionism/htm
I agree with you, I interact with homosexual co-workers cordially and with respect, never going into political or social issues or making distastefulness jokes about them. I feel sorrow for them because of this lifestyle which is not compatible with the Christian faith; contrary to some so called progressives members who have you believe. It is officially a grave sin to give in to the lifestyle. It is going to be a tough road ahead because these issues are coming to a head.Thanks. I agree. I am not homophobic. I can empathize with the homosexual issue. I don’t condone homosexual practice. (Refer to the Catechism). Hate the sin, love the sinner. However, I prefer to keep my distance. 51% is a majority, 66% is a super majority. Specifically defined gender is near 100%. People who believe they are homosexual may be 2-7%. Hopefully practicing homosexuals are less then that. Of courese they are marginalized. By definition they are marginalized. Are we supposed to ignore reality, let alone truth.
I / we have kinda strayed from the original post above but there have been some excellent points made. pertaining to rights versus priveleges, vitriol, tolerance, hate crime (both ways, no pun intended but ironic),Suppose Chick-fil-A implemented a policy of not serving *married *same-sex couples, on the grounds that doing so would be a tacit endorsement of SSM. Should Chick-fil-A be allowed to discriminate against them?
Are you referring to marriage when you say “equal protection under the law”?Why should your believe that somehow they are unworthy trump their right to equal protection under the law?
Thank you for agreeing with my point.Are you defined solely by what you do sexually?
I doubt it.
No more parades?Thank you for agreeing with my point.
If the LGBT community doesn’t want to be defined by a sex act, they should probably stop banding together as a community bound together because of sex acts.
No more parades, but I think I’ll keep silent on those free performances of broadway/off-broadway songs they do at Bryant Park sometimes. Love looking those up on youtube.No more parades?
When I do a Google search for “is Chick-fil-A dominist”, the first 2 links given are jessicajewettonline.com and www.dailykos.com (which the author of www.talk2action.org writes for). Also present are a numerous liberal blogs with an axe to grind (e.g. www.rightwingwatch.org and www.huffingtonpost.com).While Copic may have chosen better sources the, there are plenty of other sites that descibe dominionism with out the unusual bias of these two.
Chick fil a is owned by a Southern Baptist, they do not agree that Catholics are even Christian unless they abandon their Catholic baptism (which means nothing according to them) they will accept Catolics as Christian when and if they “get saved” and are rebaptised by total submersion.
The Catholic church shares little with these people, and if the domionists succeed thre US will be run by the OT law, the constituion will be discarded. Under the law sassy children will be executed,along with sassy wives, children will be chattel of their parents. And of course all homosexuals will be stoned. Oh and Catholic churches will be demolished, and the memebers and clergy will also be slaughterd as “idolators”.
The reason I was so clueless is because, as Joe Carter explains in First Things, it’s a label used exclusively on the left. Berkeley-educated sociologist Sara Diamond, the author of several critiques of Christian civic engagement, including Spiritual Warfare: The Politics of the Christian Right, invented the term in the 1980s.
Dominionism, Carter explains, is a term “never used outside liberal blogs and websites. No reputable scholars use the term for it is a meaningless neologism that Diamond concocted for her dissertation.”
David French writes for the National Review Online in I’m a Dominionist? I Had No Idea:It is, however, a handy way to smear evangelicals like Bachmann and Perry who bring biblically informed moral convictions into public debate.
What a joke. What a complete farce. If originalist legal arguments and a call to return our country to its founding constitutional ideals constitute dominionism, which social conservatives aren’t dominionist? Is free speech a dominionist concept? What about religious liberty? How about protecting life and ensuring that it cannot be taken without due process of law?
What I see is the common liberal tactic of dividing the enemy. Of course, Southern Baptists do not agree with us on everything. If they did, they would be Catholic. There are many areas of agreement and that marriage is defined by God as between 1 man and 1 woman is one of them.We’re all dominionists now.
So read their OWN authors and see what you find. Read Rick Warren, Chuck Colson and James Dobson. Then read the authors they cite as resources and inspiration. Go deep into that movement and see what the goals really are. Doing that homework over the last five years saved me from being sucked into their trap.These links point to VERY suspect content.
In the case of “jessicajewettonline.com”, her about page describes her as:
In the case of “www.talk2action.org”, they describe themselves as:
This should be enough for readers here to understand where they are coming from and that they are not going to be fans of Christian marriage nor anyone who supports it such as Chick-fil-A.
Glancing over their claims I see a lot which is very suspicious and not worth the time to shoot down one-by-one. Chick-fil-A supports my parish which is an odd thing to do if they are as described in the articles.
Bottom line: these are liberal blogs working against the shared Christian values of the Catholic Church and this business.
Support Chick-fil-A. Wednesday, August 1st is Chick-fil-A Appreciation Day. Go there for breakfast, lunch and/or dinner. Take the family. Use the drive-thru. Do not let those dedicated to the intolerant, homosexual agenda make an example out of them for simply supporting true marriage.
I don’t think they’re hypocritical. The only times this could be done is when the restaurant is closed. His people don’t work on Sundays. This is probably one of the few companies that does this. Why bust him over this as well as the marriage issue?I think so, at least from my perspective.
They are “Closed on Sunday” but are more than happy to have crews of Mexicans laying floor tiles, cleaning grease traps, installing new roofs and restripeing parking lots on Sunday.
Although they themselves might not work, they certainly are not adverse to paying others to do hard manual labor on Sunday for their own benefit.
-Tim-
It’s not our place to judge.I think so, at least from my perspective.
They are “Closed on Sunday” but are more than happy to have crews of Mexicans laying floor tiles, cleaning grease traps, installing new roofs and restripeing parking lots on Sunday.
Although they themselves might not work, they certainly are not adverse to paying others to do hard manual labor on Sunday for their own benefit.
-Tim-
The sad thing is most of the Mexicans are probably Catholic.I find it a bit hypocritical that Chick-fil-A is “Closed on Sunday” but are more than happy to have crews of Mexicans laying floor tiles, cleaning grease traps, installing new roofs and restripeing parking lots on Sunday.
Although they themselves might not work, they certainly are not adverse to paying others to do hard manual labor on Sunday for their own benefit.
-Tim-