MERGED: Where are these 40,000 plus Protestant denominations

  • Thread starter Thread starter roveau
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
It’s easy for Ginger - or any other anti-Catholic for that matter - to take a couple of quotes from the ECF’s out of context.
BUT, when you bombard her with many more quotes - IN CONTEXT - she simply “fades away”. :rolleyes:
Ginger, are you anti-catholic? If not, Elvis bore false witness.
 
Not at all. But one has to assume that everything they believed about Jesus was really true, right?

You would then need a different way of knowing that the Bible is true, though, and that all these other things are not true.

If we say, how we know that the Bible is true is that the Pope made an infallible declaration based on the findings of the Council of Carthage, who examined the Holy Tradition and found it to be so, then what you are saying is that how we know it’s true, is that the Pope is infallible, first, and that the Councils are reliable.

But, if you say that the Pope cannot be infallible, and Councils are sometimes unreliable, then you have to have a third criteria, to show that although the Council of Ephesus was wrong about Mary, the Council of Carthage had to be right about the Bible, and that although Pope Pius was wrong about Mary and was wrong to make an infallible declaration based on the findings of the Council of Ephesus with regard to what the Holy Tradition says about Mary, Pope Innocent I was right about the Bible, and the Council of Carthage proves it because of what the Holy Tradition gives us with regard to the Scriptures.

Where is your third criteria? 🙂

What makes the difference between an infallible proclamation based on the findings of the Council of Ephesus, and an infallible proclamation based on the findings of the Council of Cartthage?
The Holy Spirit is the one that inspired and He is the One that interprets. The Holy Spirit uses sinners as He has done since Adam sinned.

We trust in God’s ability not in our flesh.
 
The Holy Spirit is the one that inspired and He is the One that interprets. The Holy Spirit uses sinners as He has done since Adam sinned.
That is not in dispute. 🙂

But the Holy Spirit communicates through sinful men (Councils and Popes) to tell us what the Scriptures are, and what the Doctrines of the Church are.

We cannot discern these things by ourselves.

But if we can’t trust the Holy Spirit to work consistently through the Councils and the Popes, then we have no reliable way of knowing what the Scriptures are -especially if we then turn around and say that they got every single other thing wrong.

If they got every single other thing wrong, then by what miraculous sign do we know that they got the Scriptures right? 🤷
We trust in God’s ability not in our flesh.
Absolutely. 🙂
 
Hi, Ric,

You are more than welcome to stick with that major milestone in Catholic Apostolic Tradition - the Holy Bible. The problem that you and all the other Protestants run into is your totally UN-Biblical use of personal interpretation. That is really what I am seeing in this list of questions you are using in your posts…:rolleyes:

If you read my post #528, tell me where it does not respond to your questions. I think your questions have been answered. Now, you many not like the answer, or it may not agree with a pre-conceived idea - but, the answers are there. 🙂

If you disagree with what I said, then provide a specific argument as opposed to these generalized critical comments you’ve been making.

God bless
I’ll stick to the bible if you dont mind.

Not one pasage have you brought to me that states all the questions i asked.

Flesh and blood forgives my sins then? God has nothing to do with it, as he has left to man to decide, a sinful man at that.

Is this why the Pope is called by the CC “our Lord God the Pope”, and another God on earth. The NY Catechism calls him "Vicar of Christ, the head of the entire church…Infallible ruler, the founder of dogams…universal ruler of truth, the arbiter of the world, the suupreme judge of heaven and earth…God himself on earth. So this man has the power to forgive me my sins?

Provide me the scriptures for this?

Ric
 
Ginger, are you anti-catholic? If not, Elvis bore false witness.
I consider anybody - including you - who resorts to anything but the truth when speaking about the Church to be anti-Catholic.

You guys simply cannot continue to make these ridiculous claims and think you’re getting away with something. The Truth stands in your way.
 
Hi, Dokimas,

Seems like you have actually fallen behind in not only responding to posts, but in following through in logic! Let me explain:
I disagree with your logic. That’s like saying Paul, Peter, James and the other writers of the letters of the NT has to be perfect in all their life or the Bible can’t be without error. Wrong logic IMO.

In-other-words it makes sense that the Bible is true and the other stuff may or may not be true.
Christ did not come to earth to give us a book. When the Holy Spirit descended on the Disciples on Pentecost Sunday - the birthday of the Catholic Church - He did not deliver a book. God’s mission on earth was to redeem us from our sins - open the Gates of Heaven for us and give us the ongoing stregth to get there through the Church He founded on Peter.

The Apostles lead lives that were not perfect. Peter - the First Pope - denied Christ 3x! While there have been a number of Popes who have given bad example through sin - none have denied Christ to His Face!

In spite of the fact that all of these Apostles were sinful - God chose to work through them in a special way. When it comes to Sacred Writers - God inspired them to write His message of salvation. This same God, Who founded the Catholic Church, declared that the Gates of Hell would not prevail. How can this be? Because the Holy Spirit is guiding the Catholic Church so it can not teach error.

A classic example of this is the fact, though some think it ridiculous, is that the Bible comes directly from the Catholic Church. There was no Canon of the NT before the 4th Century. There were no Protestants before the 16th Century. So, by accepting the Bible as you claim, even this abridged version, you are accepting what the Catholic Church has determined to be Inspired. How did the Catholic Church know what was inspired and what wasn’t? The Holy Spirit guided the Catholic Church in this determination! To deny this is to put the Bible at risk for you see, only works from the OT were removed in the 16th Century - none of the Books of the NT. This is really a critical issue - and one that the 40,000 - 160,000 Protestant denominations have uniformly ignored.

God bless
 
Hi, Dokimas,

Seems like you have actually fallen behind in not only responding to posts, but in following through in logic! Let me explain:

Christ did not come to earth to give us a book. When the Holy Spirit descended on the Disciples on Pentecost Sunday - the birthday of the Catholic Church - He did not deliver a book. God’s mission on earth was to redeem us from our sins - open the Gates of Heaven for us and give us the ongoing stregth to get there through the Church He founded on Peter.

The Apostles lead lives that were not perfect. Peter - the First Pope - denied Christ 3x! While there have been a number of Popes who have given bad example through sin - none have denied Christ to His Face!

In spite of the fact that all of these Apostles were sinful - God chose to work through them in a special way. When it comes to Sacred Writers - God inspired them to write His message of salvation. This same God, Who founded the Catholic Church, declared that the Gates of Hell would not prevail. How can this be? Because the Holy Spirit is guiding the Catholic Church so it can not teach error.

A classic example of this is the fact, though some think it ridiculous, is that the Bible comes directly from the Catholic Church. There was no Canon of the NT before the 4th Century. There were no Protestants before the 16th Century. So, by accepting the Bible as you claim, even this abridged version, you are accepting what the Catholic Church has determined to be Inspired. How did the Catholic Church know what was inspired and what wasn’t? The Holy Spirit guided the Catholic Church in this determination! To deny this is to put the Bible at risk for you see, only works from the OT were removed in the 16th Century - none of the Books of the NT. This is really a critical issue - and one that the 40,000 - 160,000 Protestant denominations have uniformly ignored.

God bless
Great post. 👍

Unfortunatley it’ll probably go in one ear and out the other . . . 🤷
 
I consider anybody - including you - who resorts to anything but the truth when speaking about the Church to be anti-Catholic.

**You guys simply cannot **continue to make these ridiculous claims and think you’re getting away with something. The Truth stands in your way.
You can’t make up your own definition of anti. I know you’re wrong about me and I’ll bet you’re wrong about Ginger.

STOP bearing false witness. It’s breaking one of the Commandments. If you continue doing so, one will logically think you don’t care about the Commandments.
 
Hi, Elivisman,

What I find of concern is that if there were real honesty present, when Scriptural material was presented, it would be discussed. Dokimon’s statements fly in the face of thoughtful dialogue - as if taunting others with nonsense will really amount to anything.

I don’t know about you …but, I am not as young as I used to be - and I hear there is a lot of that ground around! 😃

Ultimately, we will all have to face our Divine Judge. The issue on how we have conducted ourselves - did we try to provide truth or did we resort to evasion, trickery and deception - all in an effort to look good while giving bad example - has got to come up. I can not see anyone ‘winning’ while leading others aways from the Chuch founded by Christ, Our Judge. IMO, if there were honestly here, a discussion on the scriptural passages would be taking place so that understanding can flourish under the guidance of Wisdom. That does not appear to be going on - and that is truly a disgrace, Dok. :mad:

God bless
Great post. 👍

Unfortunatley it’ll probably go in one ear and out the other . . . 🤷
 
Hi, Dokimas,
Hi.
Christ did not come to earth to give us a book. When the Holy Spirit descended on the Disciples on Pentecost Sunday - the birthday of the Catholic Church - He did not deliver a book. God’s mission on earth was to redeem us from our sins - open the Gates of Heaven for us and give us the ongoing stregth to get there through the Church He founded on Peter.
  1. Who said Jesus came to give us a Book? Jesus gave the Holy Spirit to remind and teach, help and comfort.
  1. The church was not called the Catholic Church. The term ‘universal’ was an adjective not a noun. Huge difference.
  1. And I thank God that’s He would redeem all humans if they’d just trust Him. Thank God that through the Broken Body and Shed Blood of Jesus the Gates of Heaven are open to who-so-ever believe on Jesus.
  1. The church Jesus founded was founded upon Him and the truth that He is the Christ, the Son of the Living God.
The Apostles lead lives that were not perfect. Peter - the First Pope - denied Christ 3x! While there have been a number of Popes who have given bad example through sin - none have denied Christ to His Face!
As a sinner, I’ll not ‘throw stones’ at those you have mentioned. I will say you are correct.
In spite of the fact that all of these Apostles were sinful - God chose to work through them in a special way. When it comes to Sacred Writers - God inspired them to write His message of salvation. This same God, Who founded the Catholic Church, declared that the Gates of Hell would not prevail. How can this be? Because the Holy Spirit is guiding the Catholic Church so it can not teach error.
  1. God did and does work through sinners. Whenever and through whom ever God works, it’s alway special.
  2. He founded His church which did not get the name ‘Catholic Church’ till some time later.
  3. The key word is ‘prevail’. This doesn’t mean the church will always be perfect. It means, as Jesus said in Romans 14 about His children (servants) that when we stumble, God will make us to stand. In spite of our frame (it’s but dust) God will make us to stand and thus prevail.
  4. Some of the early apostles tried to get the Gentile converts to be circumcised. That was error which was corrected. Error is not a problem to God. When we trust Him and look to Him, He takes error and corrects it.
  5. How do we know that the CC can’t teach error? How do we know … the CC has told us that’s true. IMO, no church teaches perfectly which means there is at least a little bit of error in every church.
A classic example of this is the fact, though some think it ridiculous, is that the Bible comes directly from the Catholic Church. There was no Canon of the NT before the 4th Century. There were no Protestants before the 16th Century. So, by accepting the Bible as you claim, even this abridged version, you are accepting what the Catholic Church has determined to be Inspired. How did the Catholic Church know what was inspired and what wasn’t? The Holy Spirit guided the Catholic Church in this determination! To deny this is to put the Bible at risk for you see, only works from the OT were removed in the 16th Century - none of the Books of the NT. This is really a critical issue - and one that the 40,000 - 160,000 Protestant denominations have uniformly ignored.
The Bible is a collection of letters written in the 1st century. They were copied, shared and passed around. God used the CC to gather them. God is the reason we have the Bible. Remember what Paul said … and this puts your comments in correct perspective, IMO.

1Co 3:6 I planted, Apollos watered, but God gave the increase.
7 So then NEITHER he who plants is anything, nor he who waters, but God who gives the increase.

Speaking of increasing thus it’s opposite:

Joh 3:30 “He must increase, but I must decrease.” [Spoken by John the Baptist]

All this talk about who’s important is against this verse, IMO.
God bless
Thank you; He does. And God bless you.
 
You didn’t debunk anything in those posts - you just disagreed.
First, I didn’t say I debunked anything. I said something to the effect that I responded or answered the question and so no point in repeating myself.

Eventually all these threads reach a point where the same statements by Catholics and Protestants begin to be repeated over and over again to no end.

I generally find it best to make my point respond to any objections and then leave…except when I am here because I don’t feel like working. then any excuse to stay is a good one 😃

BTW, just so I’m not accused of cheating my employer, I work from home and am paid for what I actually produce, so I’m not cheating anyone but myself.
 
Ginger, are you anti-catholic? If not, Elvis bore false witness.
Only concerning Elvisman. 😃 Just kidding!!!

I was raised Catholic and I thank God for that, because if my only experience with Catholics came from this forum, I would be extremely anti-catholic.

But fortunately, half my family are wonderful Christian Catholics whom I love dearly. 🙂

When someone says something terribly nasty to me, like telling me I’m going to hell because I have commited an unforgivable sin by leaving the RC or I have a demon on my back or outright says I’m a liar, I try to remember that cyberspace is no way to know a person. I am certain if I met anyone of the Catholics in this forum in person we could be good friends…with the exception of one or two…because they are decent people who mean well.

Ginger
 
Gosh, lots to read and digest.
Code:
One point.

It is my observation that Protestants move easily from one denomination to another. Sometimes it's simply a matter of moving from one community to another. They might have been Methodist before, but a friendly Presbyterian Church is near their new home with new friends who attend there, an effective preacher and pastor, and a good Sunday School - so, they become Presbyterian. Or maybe there is no Methodist Church in the new town, very small town, and they go to the Baptist Church. 

Then there are those - often more adamant theologically - who want the 'whole Bible preached faithfully'. If the preacher doesn't do what is expected, it's off to a different church. This is rare among mainline Protestants, rather common among more evangelical Protestants.

I had two experiences this week, which may or may not be relevant. I had lunch with a priest and then I chatted with a priest at a repast following a funeral. In both cases I found them very dissatisfied with the hierarchy. Neither had much use for EWTN. One said if he watched it he became so annoyed that he didn't sleep well that night, etc.

 A thought. They say 30 million Catholics have left the church in the USA. While Protestants will go from one denomination to another in their frustration, could it be that Catholics leave the church and either 'go Protestant' or become nothing? I wonder.

 As for me, I try to love everybody. Wasn't it Christ who told us to love one another? I don't recall him saying that we should love only those who go to any one church. I don't care how many Protestant denominations there are. It depends, of course, on defining terms - Protestant and denomination, to name two. Since I come from a mixed Catholic/Protestant heritage with loved ones in 'both camps' I am distressed by all this silly pettiness. When Jesus was asked how to inherit eternal life, it seems to me that he didn't mention theology or a church, but love God and our neighbor. I try my best to do that, though some neighbors make it tough. I'm not sure I would get along with some CAF posters if they moved next door. I'd try.
 
Gosh, lots to read and digest.
It is my observation that Protestants move easily from one denomination to another. Sometimes it’s simply a matter of moving from one community to another. They might have been Methodist before, but a friendly Presbyterian Church is near their new home with new friends who attend there, an effective preacher and pastor, and a good Sunday School - so, they become Presbyterian. Or maybe there is no Methodist Church in the new town, very small town, and they go to the Baptist Church.
I think you are right, but the core teachings of Christ are taught in all them.
Code:
... Neither had much use for EWTN. One said if he watched it he became so annoyed that he didn't sleep well that night, etc.
Can you expand on why they were not happy with EWTN?
Code:
 A thought. They say 30 million Catholics have left the church in the USA. While Protestants will go from one denomination to another in their frustration, could it be that Catholics leave the church and either 'go Protestant' or become nothing? I wonder.
Where did you hear 30 mil Catholics have moved on?
My concern is that many of the departed have moved away from God rather than to a different Church.
I am distressed by all this silly pettiness. When Jesus was asked how to inherit eternal life, it seems to me that he didn’t mention theology or a church, but love God and our neighbor. I try my best to do that, though . . .
AMEN to that
 
Quick question…

I keep getting emails from CAF saying my inbox is full. Is someone trying to send me a message, or why is it doing that. My inbox has been full before and the only way I knew was because a member told he was trying to send me something.

I’ll go in and delete a few messages, but if someone is trying to send me something, it won’t come thru unless you resend it.

Ginger
 
Why did those two priests disapprove of EWTN? Well, we didn’t discuss it in any great detail but in both instances they seemed to felt that EWTN represents ultra-conservative Catholicism, and both priests apparently are not of that persuasion.
Code:
 One of them did say that he felt EWTN was too hostile toward other Christians, that it had aired strongly anti-Masonic programs, that Fr. Corapi is too arrogant, that it elevates optionla traditions which bordered on superstition as fact - things most intelligent people would reject, etc. 

 The other just said he didn't waste his time watching EWTN, and he hoped non-Catholics didn't watch it either because it didn't represent Catholicism in a very positive light.
 
The only EWTN program I’ve watched is Sunday Night, Live with Fr Groeschel.
I like that program.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top