S
shyper07
Guest
Is the Catholic believe in trinity?, then who is the 3rd person of holy ghost?
The Holy Ghost is the Holy Ghost. Only much older people still use that name, though. The rest of us use Holy Spirit.Is the catholic believe in trinity?, then who is the 3rd person of holy ghost?![]()
IF god is manifested in 3 person, meaning to say that god the father have a his own person, god the son have his own person, and also the holy spirit have his own person?..did accept this?.. one god in three person and three person in one god.The Trinity is the doctrine that God is manifested in three persons: The Father The Son and The Holy Spirit; These three are equal: It is One in Three and Three in One
This Diagram should also explain en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Shield-Trinity-Scutum-Fidei-English.png
Hear, O Israel: The Lord our God is one Lord.
Go therefore and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit"
The best way to describe the Trinity (if it is possible at all) is using the words of the Church. Three ‘hypostasis’ of one ‘ousia’. ‘ousia’ being the simplest of these two words refers to a shared essence and the three ‘hypostasis’ are said to be ‘homoousios’ of one substance or essence.Three “persons” is an inaccurate way to describe the Trinity. They are not “persons” at all. They are pure spirits, of the same eternity and divinity, but with different functions in the overall plan of the Godhead. They would better be described as “entities” or “beings”.
Most people are told at a very young age that they must believe it. Some question their belief later in life and some do not.Why we believe in trinity?
It is the belief that one God exists in three forms, Father, Son and Holy Spirit.What is trinity?
This is most incorrect. God is ONE Being, not three; ONE Spirit, not three. The Athanasian Creed makes clear the ancient faith:Three “persons” is an inaccurate way to describe the Trinity. They are not “persons” at all. They are pure spirits, of the same eternity and divinity, but with different functions in the overall plan of the Godhead. They would better be described as “entities” or “beings”.
. . .the Catholic Faith is this, that we worship one God in Trinity and Trinity in Unity. Neither confounding the Persons, nor dividing the Substance. For there is one Person of the Father, another of the Son, and another of the Holy Ghost. But the Godhead of the Father, of the Son and of the Holy Ghost is all One, the Glory Equal, the Majesty Co-Eternal. Such as the Father is, such is the Son, and such is the Holy Ghost. The Father Uncreate, the Son Uncreate, and the Holy Ghost Uncreate. The Father Incomprehensible, the Son Incomprehensible, and the Holy Ghost Incomprehensible. The Father Eternal, the Son Eternal, and the Holy Ghost Eternal and yet they are not Three Eternals but One Eternal. As also there are not Three Uncreated, nor Three Incomprehensibles, but One Uncreated, and One Uncomprehensible. So likewise the Father is Almighty, the Son Almighty, and the Holy Ghost Almighty. And yet they are not Three Almighties but One Almighty.
So the Father is God, the Son is God, and the Holy Ghost is God. And yet they are not Three Gods, but One God. So likewise the Father is Lord, the Son Lord, and the Holy Ghost Lord. And yet not Three Lords but One Lord. For, like as we are compelled by the Christian verity to acknowledge every Person by Himself to be God and Lord, so are we forbidden by the Catholic Religion to say, there be Three Gods or Three Lords. The Father is made of none, neither created, nor begotten. The Son is of the Father alone; not made, nor created, but begotten. The Holy Ghost is of the Father, and of the Son neither made, nor created, nor begotten, but proceeding.
So there is One Father, not Three Fathers; one Son, not Three Sons; One Holy Ghost, not Three Holy Ghosts. And in this Trinity none is afore or after Other, None is greater or less than Another, but the whole Three Persons are Co-eternal together, and Co-equal. So that in all things, as is aforesaid, the Unity in Trinity, and the Trinity in Unity, is to be worshipped. He therefore that will be saved, must thus think of the Trinity. . .
This is Modalism, the belief that God exists in three different modes or forms, Father Son and Holy Spirit.It is the belief that one God exists in three forms, Father, Son and Holy Spirit.
I think we all understood the point you were trying to make and I’m sure no-one meant to cause you offence. Talking about the Trinity is very difficult and you were quite right to try and avoid the word ‘persons’. It really does lead to a lot of problems, especially given that to be a person has taken on an individualistic ring in the west. I recommend using the words used by the early Church Fathers, i.e. ‘hypostases’. This, translated into English as best we can means ‘being’ or ‘substantive reality’ and therefore avoids the whole problem of either calling Christ a spirit or the Father and Holy Spirit a person.Ok FCEGM,
If I amended “pure spirits” to “pure spirit”, then you’d have no problem, right? The rest of the creed (at least, the quoted portion) does not argue with what I said.
Three beings in one being, but the beings are co-eternal, etc, etc.
The word “person” entails anthropomorphism and a resemblance of humanity which God the Father and God the Holy Spirit do NOT possess. Only God the Son possesses a human aspect.
Honestly, this is splitting hairs, and is typical of how threads progress around here. I make what I regard as a reasonable, inoffensive point, and get the Athanasian Creed shoved in my face, as if it refutes my point, especially with the curt statement “This is most incorrect.” No, it wasn’t most incorrect; it may have been insufficiently worded, at worst.
Thanks a whole lot.
I’m sorry, but the Athanasian Creed wasn’t shoved in your face; it was validly used as an example to show that “Person” is very much employed in the theological language of the Church. The Church’s precise use of “Person” when speaking of the Trinity is not easily dismissed and certainly cannot be replaced by “three beings” since the Most Holy Trinity is not composed of “three Beings”, but One Being which is not divided.Ok FCEGM,
If I amended “pure spirits” to “pure spirit”, then you’d have no problem, right? The rest of the creed (at least, the quoted portion) does not argue with what I said.
Three beings in one being, but the beings are co-eternal, etc, etc.
The word “person” entails anthropomorphism and a resemblance of humanity which God the Father and God the Holy Spirit do NOT possess. Only God the Son possesses a human aspect.
Honestly, this is splitting hairs, and is typical of how threads progress around here. I make what I regard as a reasonable, inoffensive point, and get the Athanasian Creed shoved in my face, as if it refutes my point, especially with the curt statement “This is most incorrect.” No, it wasn’t most incorrect; it may have been insufficiently worded, at worst.
Thanks a whole lot.
The Catechism uses person, that’s why most people use it. It also depends on how you define a person. When I use person I don’t mean that I think they each have a body or anything. A person is what distinguishes beings from one another, so the Second Person of the Trinity is the Son, that is His Person, His being the Son.Three “persons” is an inaccurate way to describe the Trinity. They are not “persons” at all. They are pure spirits, of the same eternity and divinity, but with different functions in the overall plan of the Godhead. They would better be described as “entities” or “beings”.
He is considered a person because He is attributed qualities that only persons have.The bible proved that god the father have a person,and he have a spirit, body and soul. like Jesus Christ. The problem is, how can we proved that the holy ghost have a person?, so that we can believe the trinity 3 person in one god?