Messiah ben Joseph versus Messiah ben David

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ben_Masada
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
No, that is not what I meant. Were they seen as separate from the tribe OF Judah at that time?
Yes, they were seen as separate Tribe from Judah as a Tribe. But there were many Levites in Judah even before the Ten Tribes were taken away. Most priests were down in Judah for Temple services. They had stayed loyal to David.

Ben: 🙂
 
I read again about the New Covenant in Jeremiah 31. It is a Covenant with the House of Israel and the House of Judah. Nothing to do with Gentiles. And you are right, it is different from the Sinaitic Covenant.

Commandments can be broken all the time that we are still on the flesh. It doesn’t mean the Covenant is broken. The Covenant gets broken when we reject it. And we have never rejected it. I mean, there was a time when Judah rejected the Covenant with God as we have from Isaiah 8:6, but because of God’s promise to David in I Kings 11:36, Israel was used to redeem Judah, and we got restored back in the favors of the Almighty. Since then, we have never rejected God’s Covenant which has become eternal with us. (Jer. 31:35-37)
OK, you sort out what “broke” means for yourself, but the fact still is–

Jeremiah 31:32
It will not be like the covenant
I made with their forefathers
when I took them by the hand
to lead them out of Egypt,
**because they broke my covenant, **
though I was a husband to them, "
declares the LORD.

Again, when the New Covenant came to Israel, it was later the remnant of Israel, that is the Church at the time, learned that the God of Israel has granted salvation even to the gentiles through his one and only Son.
The Law is written in the heart and obedience is voluntary and not compulsive.
To the people who belong to the New Covenant, it is called "Grace."
 
OK, you sort out what “broke” means for yourself, but the fact still is–
Jeremiah 31:32
It will not be like the covenant
I made with their forefathers
when I took them by the hand
to lead them out of Egypt,
**because they broke my covenant, **
 
Just some posts on this subject I had made some time ago:

There are references in Jewiish scripture to a minor messiah descended from the line of Joseph (son of Jacob), who is to die (not sure if it makes reference to resurrection but I seem to recall something about this). But it is clear that this person is not “The” Messiah that we are waiting for and that his death may or may not be necessary as a prerequiste to “The” Messiah.

My understanding is that Messiah Ben Joseph is NOT required to come before Messiah Ben David. He’s merely a minor “possibility.”

One of the principle characteristics of the Messiah ben Joseph, in preparing the way for “The Messiah” is to wage war against the forces of evil. Jesus was no warrior. And no political or military leader. Jesus certainly didn’t wage war against the enemies of Israel.

Yes, its true that the Messiah ben Joseph will be killed. But killed in war, not on a cross.

Moreover, I am reading that the Messiah ben David is to follow “shortly” after the death of Messiah ben Joseph. And that the ressurection of the ben joseph will be accomplished by ben David (website citing to Pirkei Heichalot Rabaty, ch. 39).

As to the necessity of there even being a need for a messiah ben joseph, that seems to depend on us. His task is to prepare Israel for the coming of the big “M”. If Israel repents, we are to be immediatley redeemed , in which case there will be no need, it is said, for a messiah ben Joseph. Moshiach ben David will come directly and redeem us and we can avoid the trials and tribulations.

R. Saadiah Gaon (one of the few to elaborate on the role of Moshiach ben Yossef) notes that this sequence is not definite but contingent. Moshiach ben Yossef will not have to appear before Moshiach ben David, nor will the activities attributed to him or his death have to occur. All depends on the spiritual condition of the Jewish people at the time the redemption is to take place
moshiach.com/discover/tut…sef.php#_ftn13
 
Just a few speculative thoughts of my own:
As to the necessity of there even being a need for a messiah ben joseph, that seems to depend on us. His task is to prepare Israel for the coming of the big “M”. If Israel repents, we are to be immediatley redeemed , in which case there will be no need, it is said, for a messiah ben Joseph. Moshiach ben David will come directly and redeem us and we can avoid the trials and tribulations.
As Christ said He would not have needed to go to the vinyard if those who worked for Him there had come to repentance.
28 But what think you? A certain man had two sons; and coming to the first, he said: Son, go work today in my vineyard. 29 And he answering, said: I will not. But afterwards, being moved with repentance, he went. 30 And coming to the other, he said in like manner. And he answering, said: I go, Sir; and he went not.

31 Which of the two did the father’s will? They say to him: The first. Jesus saith to them: Amen I say to you, that the publicans and the harlots shall go into the kingdom of God before you. 32 For John came to you in the way of justice, and you did not believe him. But the publicans and the harlots believed him: but you, seeing it, did not even afterwards repent, that you might believe him. 33 Hear ye another parable. There was a man an householder, who planted a vineyard, and made a hedge round about it, and dug in it a press, and built a tower, and let it out to husbandmen; and went into a strange country. 34 And when the time of the fruits drew nigh, he sent his servants to the husbandmen that they might receive the fruits thereof. 35 And the husbandmen laying hands on his servants, beat one, and killed another, and stoned another.

36 Again he sent other servants more than the former; and they did to them in like manner. 37 And last of all he sent to them his son, saying: They will reverence my son. 38 But the husbandmen seeing the son, said among themselves: This is the heir: come, let us kill him, and we shall have his inheritance. 39 And taking him, they cast him forth out of the vineyard, and killed him. 40 When therefore the lord of the vineyard shall come, what will he do to those husbandmen?
Just some posts on this subject I had made some time ago:

There are references in Jewiish scripture to a minor messiah descended from the line of Joseph (son of Jacob), who is to die (not sure if it makes reference to resurrection but I seem to recall something about this). But it is clear that this person is not “The” Messiah that we are waiting for and that his death may or may not be necessary as a prerequiste to “The” Messiah.
Can I draw a parallel to John the Baptist and Jesus Christ; And when John was fulfilling his course, he said: I am not he, whom you think me to be: but behold, there cometh one after me, whose shoes of his feet I am not worthy to loose.
My understanding is that Messiah Ben Joseph is NOT required to come before Messiah Ben David. He’s merely a minor “possibility.”
A possibility which occured - a voice that cried out in the wilderness, prepare a way for the Lord.
One of the principle characteristics of the Messiah ben Joseph, in preparing the way for “The Messiah” is to wage war against the forces of evil. Jesus was no warrior. And no political or military leader. Jesus certainly didn’t wage war against the enemies of Israel.
John challenged the status quo in the vinyard, casting the first weapon in the war waged against evil by calling everyone to be baptised and repent; 1 And in those days cometh John the Baptist preaching in the desert of Judea. 2 And saying: Do penance: for the kingdom of heaven is at hand. 3 For this is he that was spoken of by Isaias the prophet, saying: A voice of one crying in the desert, Prepare ye the way of the Lord, make straight his paths.
Yes, its true that the Messiah ben Joseph will be killed. But killed in war, not on a cross.
John the Baptist was killed in the war against the forces of evil when he was beheaded.
Moreover, I am reading that the Messiah ben David is to follow “shortly” after the death of Messiah ben Joseph.
John says; 11 I indeed baptize you in the water unto penance, but he that shall come after me, is mightier than I, whose shoes I am not worthy to bear; he shall baptize you in the Holy Ghost and fire. 12 Whose fan is in his hand, and he will thoroughly cleanse his floor and gather his wheat into the barn; but the chaff he will burn with unquenchable fire. 13 Then cometh Jesus from Galilee to the Jordan, unto John, to be baptized by him. 14 But John stayed him, saying: I ought to be baptized by thee, and comest thou to me? 15 And Jesus answering, said to him: Suffer it to be so now. For so it becometh us to fulfill all justice. Then he suffered him.

16 And Jesus being baptized, forthwith came out of the water: and lo, the heavens were opened to him: and he saw the Spirit of God descending as a dove, and coming upon him. 17 And behold a voice from heaven, saying: This is my beloved Son, in whom I am well pleased.

cont…
 
…cont.
And that the ressurection of the ben joseph will be accomplished by ben David (website citing to Pirkei Heichalot Rabaty, ch. 39)
25 Jesus said to her: I am the resurrection and the life: he that believeth in me, although he be dead, shall live: This would include ressurrecting John the Baptist.
R. Saadiah Gaon (one of the few to elaborate on the role of Moshiach ben Yossef) notes that this sequence is not definite but contingent. Moshiach ben Yossef will not have to appear before Moshiach ben David, nor will the activities attributed to him or his death have to occur. All depends on the spiritual condition of the Jewish people at the time the redemption is to take place
moshiach.com/discover/tut…sef.php#_ftn13
And Jesus said; 37 Jerusalem, Jerusalem, thou that killest the prophets, and stonest them that are sent unto thee, how often would I have gathered together thy children, as the hen doth gather her chickens under her wings, and thou wouldest not?
 
Just some posts on this subject I had made some time ago:
There are references in Jewiish scripture to a minor messiah descended from the line of Joseph (son of Jacob), who is to die (not sure if it makes reference to resurrection but I seem to recall something about this). But it is clear that this person is not “The” Messiah that we are waiting for and that his death may or may not be necessary as a prerequiste to “The” Messiah
 
Valke2;4891327:
Just some posts on this subject I had made some time ago:

Hi Valke2, what do you mean when you mention the word resurrection? When one dies, he or she will never return. To think so is to look for contradiction in the Tanach. Unless you are referring to resurrection in the sense of Ezekiel 37:12. A symbolic resurrection from the graves of the nations.
.

Resurrection of the dead is one of the 13 principles of Judaism set forth by Rambam.
 
Ben Masada;4892263:
Originally Posted by Valke2
Just some posts on this subject I had made some time ago:

Hi Valke2, what do you mean when you mention the word resurrection? When one dies, he or she will never return. To think so is to look for contradiction in the Tanach. Unless you are referring to resurrection in the sense of Ezekiel 37:12. A symbolic resurrection from the graves of the nations…

Resurrection of the dead is one of the 13 principles of Judaism set forth by Rambam.
JEW FIGHT!!! :p;)

This is one issue that I have run into whenever I try to look into the Jewish past of my faith. It was an issue then and it is one now. There are very devout Jews who say things that are the opposite of other devout Jews.

What is a gentile to do? I will eat my bacon cheese burger until you guys hash it out! 🙂
 
Ben Masada;4892263:
Resurrection of the dead is one of the 13 principles of Judaism set forth by Rambam.
Hi Valke2, I think the Rambam was a little too rational and enough intelligent to be legislating on the Christian concept of resurrection. Besides, he knew of enough Scriptures attesting against such a concept. Here are just some of them: Job 7 :9,10; 10:21; 14:12; II Samuel 12:23; Psalm 88:6; 146:4; Proverbs 2:19; Ezekiel 26:20; and so forth. I haven’t even got into the book of Ecclesiastes, which is famous against the subject.

Have you ever read “The Guide for the Perplexed” by Maimonides? That book was the Rambam’s opus prima. If you read it, you will have a different opinion of his having included Christian resurrection among the 13 principles of faith. And don’t forget, “Principles of Faith.” Not principles of Judaism. Perhaps he was legislating for those who among us behave no different from Christians who need something to exercise their faith.

Ben: 🙂
 
Valke2;4899301:
JEW FIGHT!!! :p;)

This is one issue that I have run into whenever I try to look into the Jewish past of my faith. It was an issue then and it is one now. There are very devout Jews who say things that are the opposite of other devout Jews.

What is a gentile to do? I will eat my bacon cheese burger until you guys hash it out! 🙂
If you take dissent and discussion out of Judaism you are left with something that is not Judaism. On the topic of Ressurection, either Ben or I are correct or we both have valid insights about this particular aspect. Either way, I urge you to go get a salad instead. 😉
 
Valke2;4899301:
Hi Valke2, I think the Rambam was a little too rational and enough intelligent to be legislating on the Christian concept of resurrection. Besides, he knew of enough Scriptures attesting against such a concept. Here are just some of them: Job 7 :9,10; 10:21; 14:12; II Samuel 12:23; Psalm 88:6; 146:4; Proverbs 2:19; Ezekiel 26:20; and so forth. I haven’t even got into the book of Ecclesiastes, which is famous against the subject.

Have you ever read “The Guide for the Perplexed” by Maimonides? That book was the Rambam’s opus prima. If you read it, you will have a different opinion of his having included Christian resurrection among the 13 principles of faith. And don’t forget, “Principles of Faith.” Not principles of Judaism. Perhaps he was legislating for those who among us behave no different from Christians who need something to exercise their faith.

Ben: 🙂
I’ve read the Guide. I’m not suggesting that the concept has anything to do with the Christian theology of Jesus’ resurrection. But the concept of the resurrection of the dead is not foriegn to Judaism. The difference is, I believe, that we understand that God will resurrect the dead and the christians believe Jesus was God and that he resurrected himself.
 
And just to be clear, the issue of a messiah ben joseph is far from settled within Judaism. All of the references to him occur in later midrash and talmudic references. And there is not exactly a wealth of discussion on him where it is dicussed.
 
Valke,
you hit on my point. Judaism is commonly seen as being more monolithic in theology. Many non-Jews think that all Jews hold the same set of beliefs. That was not true 2,000 years ago, when the Pharacies and the Saducies argued over the after-life, and it is not true today.

I am not saying that they are nearly as divided as Christianity in theology. After all, we have 2 billion believers.

The Resurection of the dead is one of the Jewish things that Christianity kept with it. Jesus was just the first. We still hold a few other Jewish ideas.

What are some good sources on this ben David/ben Joseph thing?
 
It will be difficult to find original source material. your best bet is probably to start with wikipedia and see what sources it lists.
 
Ben Masada;4900348:
I’ve read the Guide. I’m not suggesting that the concept has anything to do with the Christian theology of Jesus’ resurrection. But the concept of the resurrection of the dead is not foriegn to Judaism. The difference is, I believe, that we understand that God will resurrect the dead and the christians believe Jesus was God and that he resurrected himself.
Good Valke2, so you understand what I mean about a man of that size as
the Rambam. I believe he meant resurrection in terms of Ezekiel 37:12. “Thus says the Lord God: O my people, I will open your graves and have you rise from them, and bring you back to the Land of Israel.” That’s what resurrection means for rational people.

Ben: 🙂
 
Valke2;4900600:
Good Valke2, so you understand what I mean about a man of that size as
the Rambam. I believe he meant resurrection in terms of Ezekiel 37:12. “Thus says the Lord God: O my people, I will open your graves and have you rise from them, and bring you back to the Land of Israel.” That’s what resurrection means for rational people.

Ben: 🙂
Heh. I think we can get a whole lot of opinions as to what constitutes rational resurrection 🙂
 
Ben Masada;4902187:
Heh. I think we can get a whole lot of opinions as to what constitutes rational resurrection 🙂
Hi Valke2, I hope you don’t suppose I am speaking about really dead people coming back to life. Ezekiel is speaking about the graves of the nations where Jews are in exile or simply living in the Diaspora. Their decision to return to the Land of the Living, which Isaiah calls the Land of Israel in Isaiah 53:8,9, would be resurrection.

Absolutely irrational is to think of real dead people coming back to life, and for what, to live again where? God is not a God of the dead but of the living. God does not need dead people to repopulate the earth. The living can do that.

Ben: 🙂
 
Valke2;4902311:
Hi Valke2, I hope you don’t suppose I am speaking about really dead people coming back to life. Ezekiel is speaking about the graves of the nations where Jews are in exile or simply living in the Diaspora. Their decision to return to the Land of the Living, which Isaiah calls the Land of Israel in Isaiah 53:8,9, would be resurrection.

Absolutely irrational is to think of real dead people coming back to life, and for what, to live again where? God is not a God of the dead but of the living. God does not need dead people to repopulate the earth. The living can do that.
Ben: 🙂

So when you die, what happens to you?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top