Yeah. I agree. After initial shock I have come to view this as a great display of humility.I’ve contemplated on this and even though I was shocked at first, I realize this is how the hierarchy in the Orthodox Church works. If this was the Catholic Church, it would have been the Pope who would have moved the bishop. In this case the Metropolitan, in consultation with the Synod of the OCA, came to a decision to resign.
From what we can gather from the outside, it was a little more complicated than a simple resignation. The OCA has had its woes over the last few years, including a financial scandal, and this doesn’t necessarily help the healing process.In this case the Metropolitan, in consultation with the Synod of the OCA, came to a decision to resign.
I have nothing to add, except my prayers are with him.There are mixed emotions across the OCA and general Orthodox communities about this development. We hope to hear from some of our … Orthodox contributors on CAF on this subject.
Same here.I have nothing to add, except my prayers are with him.
What corruption was going on? If you don’t mind me asking. Thanks.Just as he was about to come do some ordinations for us (thankfully we still have Bishop Irene coming).
I always liked Metropolitan Jonah, but I also always got the sense that he was unhappy. He was basically thrust into the position in order to be a clean break from the corruption that had dogged the upper reaches of the church.
My prayers are with him.
The whole financial scandal. It didn`t involve the bulk of the bishops, but they nonetheless elected Metropolitan Jonah largely because he was an outsider.What corruption was going on? If you don’t mind me asking. Thanks.
There were some big dollars received as one or more donations (I don’t know) which was not properly recorded, and became a (sort of) expense account. So it was financial malfeasance, I would say.What corruption was going on? If you don’t mind me asking. Thanks.
I’m not sure if the Greek Orthodox Archdiocese of America recognizes the ‘autocephaly’ of the OCA. The Patriarch of Constantinople doesn’t. Maybe some of our Orthodox brethren on the forums will shed some light on this. I’ve been reading up recently on which Orthodox churches recognize each other, and it seems a bit convoluted.I don’t know if this is even possible, but the US is a country in which the OCA is uniquely positioned to seek help from other Orthodox churches. In my mind, it would make sense for them to reach out to the Russian Orthodox in America (given their shared history and recent efforts at getting closer to each other) and maybe the Greek Orthodox just because it’s a strong church with the strongest Orthodox presence in America. I don’t know how much of it could actually happen or exactly what they could do, but I’d like to see them reach out to each other and use the scandal as an opportunity to work with each other.
They are all in communion with one another. There may be some smaller splinter groups like the SSPX but generally not so bad.I’m not sure if the Greek Orthodox Archdiocese of America recognizes the ‘autocephaly’ of the OCA. The Patriarch of Constantinople doesn’t. Maybe some of our Orthodox brethren on the forums will shed some light on this. I’ve been reading up recently on which Orthodox churches recognize each other, and it seems a bit convoluted.
Why?Makes me glad we have a Pope.![]()
Thank you for the clarification!They are all in communion with one another. There may be some smaller splinter groups like the SSPX but generally not so bad.
The issue has to do with the Russian church unilaterally deciding to grant the American church autocephaly. The EP apparently thinks the act was irregular, but it is in fact accomplished. A minor squabble.
It does not affect day to day operations and members go from one jurisdiction to another easily.
All sacraments are valid, there is no problem accepting one another’s people at the table, and both churches are on board with the Chambésy initiative.
They still recognize us as fully Orthodox. They have valid points and concerns regarding our autocephaly. Though it is a contradiction of terms, I’d say we have partial autocephaly.I’m not sure if the Greek Orthodox Archdiocese of America recognizes the ‘autocephaly’ of the OCA. The Patriarch of Constantinople doesn’t. Maybe some of our Orthodox brethren on the forums will shed some light on this. I’ve been reading up recently on which Orthodox churches recognize each other, and it seems a bit convoluted.
Makes me glad we have a Pope.![]()
I don’t know why we have to get into polemics like this. We don’t have to deep dive into history to find many quarrels within the Catholic hierarchy despite the presence of the Pope. The SSPX is a very present example. And if we are to believe in the VatiLeaks, it seems there is also a power struggle in the Vatican today.Thank you for the clarification!
I’m glad that the Catholic Church has the Holy Father because he is the successor of Peter and there is a centralized living authority to resolve disputes, as opposed to a decentralized group of ‘equals.’
Something important to remember.I spoke to an Eastern Catholic priest and told him I am wondering if should be Orthodox. He told me the grass is not greener on the other side, it just has different weeds. And the Orthodox priest I spoke to told me that no Church on earth is free from sickness. Let us avoid comments such as these because there is plenty of mud to sling at both sides.