blackforest
Well-known member
I asked you above to explain your rationale for asking the Chicago scenario. It may have taken you a few posts, but thank you for finally doing so. I can now proceed with engaging you in this discussion.The same comments have been written about children in Chicago living in the wrong neighborhoods. Based on what is said, they should be given refugee status in Mexico. As I noted previously, this is in accordance with international treaty and would also force Mexico to be a responsible neighbor and stop ignoring the problem. The role of the US is to help governance in all the affected countries better deal with the situation.
The reason the point of the question wasn’t obvious is because it’s an absurdly false analogy. Does your hypothetical single mother have to escape late at night without her papers to leave Chicago? Does she have to cross thousands of miles braving dehydration, heat exhaustion, scorpions, National Guard troops, helicopter spotlights, rat-infested sewage tunnels, unscrupulous rapists, and detention centers? Does she even have to go all the way to Canada? The U.S. is a giant country which, unlike El Salvador, has a LOT of safe places.
It bears repeating that the people crossing Mexico were doing nothing illegal.
Calm down. I did not call Sowell a liar, and it is not the ad hominem fallacy to ask where someone, Sowell or otherwise, is obtaining his/her data. Are you able to cite it? Or shall we move on with this given lack of evidence?That Sowell is conservative hardly makes him unreliable, unless you are progressive (ROFL, then anyone who disagrees with you is unreliable). You probably think Krugman walks on water, while I just read his arguments with a critical eye. I don’t call him a liar as my first response, an ad hominem.