Michael Savage(s) Catholicism

  • Thread starter Thread starter swampfox
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
S

swampfox

Guest
catholicleague.org/06press_releases/quarter%201/060330_Michael_Savage.htm
he comes across as a paranoiac maniac

Here is what radio talk-show host Michael Savage had to say on March 28 about the Catholic Church’s response to the immigration issue:

It is a pig story! It’s animal farm all over again. And also make no bones about it, it’s the greedy Catholic Church that was behind it because the people of America walked away from the molesters’ dens and they need to bring in people from the Third World who are still gullible enough to sit there and listen to the molesters…the Roman Catholic Church was behind this, the Roman Catholic Church started this a year ago. The Roman Catholic Church flooded the streets because they cannot get parishioners anymore amongst educated white people who have caught onto the racket and instead they need to import dummies to sit in the church pews. That’s the story and it is not difficult for you to understand—I’m telling you the truth. It’s all about greed. It’s greed at the top of the Catholic Church.

Make no mistake about why this is happening. This has nothing to do with compassion for Mexican workers. This has nothing to do with fairness for Mexican workers—it has to do with the greed…. That’s all there is to it. And that includes the Catholic Church pigs. And if you don’t like it, don’t listen to the show—I really don’t care anymore. I’m not going to be duped by this sanctimonious garbage that all churches are good and that the institution itself is good. Bah humbug. The institution is rotten from the top to the bottom.

Catholic League president Bill Donohue responded as follows:

“I was scheduled to be on with Mike Savage the day he savaged the Catholic Church and made bigoted comments about Latinos. But in the pre-interview—which occurred just a half hour before Savage went ballistic—I let a producer know that I did not share the host’s position; after he checked with Savage, I was told they would not have me on the show. That was fine, but what is not fine is Savage’s diatribe about the ‘greedy pigs’ in the Catholic Church and how ‘the institution is rotten from the top to the bottom.’ He owes all Catholics an apology.”
 
Never listened to Savage much because of the time of day he was on locally. Now, I won’t listen to him at all:)
 
Savage hates everything but his dog. So God Bless him. He needs help. :o
 
Your popcorn is getting cold and/or soggy (did you add butter?).
40.png
LCMS_No_More:
This should be interesting.

gets out the popcorn

😉
 
40.png
Geldain:
Never listened to Savage much because of the time of day he was on locally. Now, I won’t listen to him at all:)
🙂 good. he’s a neoconservative anyway.
 
40.png
robins:
Savage hates everything but his dog. So God Bless him. He needs help. :o
That was degrading.

I listen to Savage everyday. I would with a segment of what his rant but reject the other portions. Mark My Words, It is not Savage who censures unorthodox Catholics it is the UNORTHODOX BISHOPS WHO SUBVERT THE EDIFICES OF CATHOLICSM, DAILY. So lets inspect our Bishops instead of Savage.
 
40.png
rlg94086:
Your popcorn is getting cold and/or soggy (did you add butter?).
Probably ran out of spice or salt for that matter.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
 
40.png
bones_IV:
Gilliam, pardon me for asking, what’s paleoconservative? Not be disrespectful.
I think it’s a teasing response to the term “neoconservative.” paleo-meaning older, while neo-meaning newer.
 
40.png
LRThunder:
I think it’s a teasing response to the term “neoconservative.” paleo-meaning older, while neo-meaning newer.
:rotfl:
Oh I get it, thanks.
 
I have never liked Savage. He is so negative that he makes Rush Limbaugh seem like a pussy cat. I have read more than one thread on this forum where conservatives just love this guy. I have never understood it, and this comment just underlines how awful he can be.
 
40.png
bapcathluth:
I have never liked Savage. He is so negative that he makes Rush Limbaugh seem like a pussy cat. I have read more than one thread on this forum where conservatives just love this guy. I have never understood it, and this comment just underlines how awful he can be.
Most of your argumets are premised out of “context”. He is bashing the LIBERAL BISHOPS who do subvert the edifices of Catholicsm
 
Some of the things he says make sense, but I don’t like his delivery. I liked him at first, but I stopped listening to him regularly years ago…1997 or 1998, after hearing him rant about how important it was to “have more white babies” and no, he wasn’t being sarcastic.

I was listening yesterday while channel surfing and heard him talking about the current issue. I don’t agree with Roger Cardinal Mahoney completely, but Savage didn’t just rail against him as the OP shows.

Rush may say things people find offensive (i.e. feminazis), but he delivers it in a tongue-in-cheek, friendly manner 99.357% of the time, and is generally friendly to the few callers he has who disagree with him.
40.png
bapcathluth:
I have never liked Savage. He is so negative that he makes Rush Limbaugh seem like a pussy cat. I have read more than one thread on this forum where conservatives just love this guy. I have never understood it, and this comment just underlines how awful he can be.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top