G
Gardenman
Guest
I’ve just started listening to MV and am wondering what those familiar with him and his ideas think of him.
(Just want to add a word of caution to this discussion–in the past threads on MV get contentious and have caused problems. Proceed with great caution)I’ve just started listening to MV and am wondering what those familiar with him and his ideas think of him.
IMO, Michael Voris loves the Church very much and does his best to defend it, but He is not the Pope or the Magesterium and sometimes he can err. He can be very abrasive in his style. Some people like that, I sometimes find it rather offensive. If one is investigating Catholicism, I would not recommend they listen to him. I would recommend others who speak the truth, but don’t sound like a fire and brimstone street preacher. They probably have had enough of that already.I’ve just started listening to MV and am wondering what those familiar with him and his ideas think of him.
Yes, sadly most of these threads wind up getting shut down.(Just want to add a word of caution to this discussion–in the past threads on MV get contentious and have caused problems. Proceed with great caution)
This is an example of the line of thinking I really urge people to stay away from. It is possible to find someone’s presentation offensive even if you agree with the substance.I think most who get offended do so as they hold to some of the views he attacks.
Wrong assumption. I hold most of his “traditionalist” views, and I still am offended by him. I find him entertaining to watch every-so-often, but he’s brash, emotional, and rude. Some of his videos are semi-schismatic (as they advocate disobeying the bishops, and talk down on the bishops, especially his video on receiving the Eucharist in the hand, and his recent video on Cardinal Pell of Sydney, Australia), and thus problematic. Again, he’s entertaining to watch every once and awhile, but his videos are angry and full of himself. I would never recommend watching him consistently.He was a major aid in my conversion, I really like him as he is rarely in error and speaks in a relativly easy to understand manner. I think most who get offended do so as they hold to some of the views he attacks.I have never had a major problem with him.
I am an example of such offensive reaction.This is an example of the line of thinking I really urge people to stay away from. It is possible to find someone’s presentation offensive even if you agree with the substance.
nothing wrong with fire and brimestone, in fact the gospel talks more about hell than heaven, does that make Jesus a fire and brimestone street preacherIMO, Michael Voris loves the Church very much and does his best to defend it, but He is not the Pope or the Magesterium and sometimes he can err. He can be very abrasive in his style. Some people like that, I sometimes find it rather offensive. If one is investigating Catholicism, I would not recommend they listen to him. I would recommend others who speak the truth, but don’t sound like a fire and brimstone street preacher. They probably have had enough of that already.
Then there are those who need a wakeup call, but often they don’t respond to that style of preaching. Some do, though.
And it is not a sin to dislike him and disagree with him on some things, though some would have you believe that.Things can get pretty heated when Michael Voris is discussed. Proceed with caution and do not be afraid to do your own thinking when it comes to Michael Voris.
There are surely better messengers than him. People should read more the writings of our Pope and even Pope John Paul II.I think he’s a classic example of “If you can’t get past the messenger, you won’t hear the message.”
I agree. I’m a strong advocate of reading up on papal encyclicals or translations of Wednesday audiences. They really aren’t that hard to read, and they still contain a lot of great spiritual information. Or if a Holy Father has written a book or (like Pope John XXIII) has his journal or personal notes published, also good reading material.There are surely better messengers than him. People should read more the writings of our Pope and even Pope John Paul II.
It would depend on how the article is presented.If you have a PHD in Physics but can’t write an article that a non PHD can understand…I agree. I’m a strong advocate of reading up on papal encyclicals or translations of Wednesday audiences. They really aren’t that hard to read, and they still contain a lot of great spiritual information. Or if a Holy Father has written a book or (like Pope John XXIII) has his journal or personal notes published, also good reading material.
Or anyone with a theological degree greater than an STBAfter all, would you rather read a physics article with someone with a PhD in physics or a BS in physics?