Minors entering contests

  • Thread starter Thread starter PeteZaHut
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
P

PeteZaHut

Guest
Just wondering what you all thought about the morality of a situation where a minor enters some kind of online contest. In the fine print at the bottom, of course, it says that all participants must be 18 or older. Being under 18 does not give the person any kind of unfair advantage. Let’s say he wins, and has one of his parents claim the prize. What do you all think?
 
Most contest entry forms will have some sort of declaration to be signed at the end, meaning that the person is affirming that they are indeed over 18 and that the entry is all their own work.

In that case, the minor is committing fraud by falsely affirming to be over 18, and the parents are committing fraud by claiming a prize for an entry that was not theirs. Both sinful, probably gravely so.

It would be like finding someone else’s winning lottery ticket on the ground and claiming their prize - if you didn’t buy the ticket, you have no right to it.

If there isn’t such a declaration … I’d still say you’re deliberately misrepresenting your age, knowing that the contest organisers will assume you’re over 18. Still sinful.

The best thing in most all cases is to be honest. Ring up the organisers and say ‘look, I know you say only over 18s can enter, but I’ve got a really good entry I’d like to put in even though I’m underage. Is there any way you could make an exception?’ They might explain why it’s restricted, which is usually for some good reason.
 
In that case, the minor is committing fraud by falsely affirming to be over 18, and the parents are committing fraud by claiming a prize for an entry that was not theirs. Both sinful, probably gravely so.
I wouldn’t see that as being gravely sinful. You are lying, so it is sinful. But if the minor is say 16 or 17, and just as worthy of entering the contest as an 18 year old, then you are just lying to enter the contest. And the parents would just be lying so that their child could claim the prize he won fairly (fairly in a sense that he had no unfair advantage).
It would be like finding someone else’s winning lottery ticket on the ground and claiming their prize - if you didn’t buy the ticket, you have no right to it.
I meant that the parents would just be claiming the prize to give it to the child. I would compare that more to picking up the lottery ticket on the ground, claiming the money, then use the time you have afterwards to find the rightful winner, since a new winner would have been picked if you had searched for the ticket owner before turning the ticket in.
 
I wouldn’t see that as being gravely sinful. You are lying, so it is sinful. But if the minor is say 16 or 17, and just as worthy of entering the contest as an 18 year old, then you are just lying to enter the contest. And the parents would just be lying so that their child could claim the prize he won fairly (fairly in a sense that he had no unfair advantage).
You’re doing more than lying in casual circumstances, you’re very likely affirming your lies under oath. That’s what those declarations usually mean, there can be legal penalties attached to false declarations, it’s just like perjury - and swearing a false oath is definitely a grave sin.

Firstly winning by breaking the rules is in itself an unfair advantage. No-one has an automatic right to enter a competition just because they think they can. You have the privilege of entering a competition only if you meet the requirements and abide by the rules which are set for it.

More than that, it’s unfair to the kids who chose to obey the rules and not enter because they were underage.

Like if you hand in a school assignment late and lie about having been sick or something so you’re not penalised, it’s an unfair advantage to you.

It’s unfair to those who did it on time, because rightfully they should be marked higher than you for work of the same quality. And it’s also unfair to those who maybe handed it in late but chose to be honest and take the rightful penalty, since all the late ones should suffer the penalty.
I meant that the parents would just be claiming the prize to give it to the child. I would compare that more to picking up the lottery ticket on the ground, claiming the money, then use the time you have afterwards to find the rightful winner, since a new winner would have been picked if you had searched for the ticket owner before turning the ticket in.
Yeah, but they have no right to claim the prize in the first place, it is not their prize, not their property, therefore they have no rights over it. Not even if their intention is simply to give it to the child.

You have no right to claim money on someone else’s lottery ticket even if you want to give it to them. It’s THEIR ticket and THEIR money, their property. Your only right is in fact a duty - to look for them first, give THEM the ticket which is their property, and let THEM claim the money which is also rightfully their property.
 
I just can’t bring myself to see that as a grave sin.

An oath is when you call on God to witness the truth, as in the situation with perjury. When you check the box that says “I am 18 or older,” that doesn’t say anything about God. That just seems like a lie to me, not the breaking of an oath.
 
Contests have rules, you break the rules, you are not entitled to the prize. As far as being morally wrong…breaking rules that are fair and agreed upon by a contract seems to me to be ethically, morally and legally wrong. Besides as a parent what would you be teaching the minor child about hedging on the rules…that breaking rules is acceptable. Seems pretty plain to me.
 
Note the Catechism: The Seventh Commandment requires
2410 Promises must be kept and contracts strictly observed to the extent that the commitments made in them are morally just. A significant part of economic and social life depends on the honoring of contracts between physical or moral persons—commercial contracts of purchase or sale, rental or labor contracts. All contracts must be agreed to and executed in good faith.
 
my 12 year old entered a contest for an alarm company, and she won! they called the house asking for her by name. i thought this was odd and ask why they wanted to talk to her. Well I laugh and said she was 12. they did not care and said we could have the prize if we made an appointment to up grade the alarm. I guess it really does not matter how old you are. By the way I told them no and they should police the entry ben a little better.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top