B
BListon
Guest
Does America consider it legal for a minor under 21 to take communion. If so, how… because they are drinking alcohol? Just curious.
most states have a religious exemption for alcohol. Taking just the consecrated wafers is fine, Christ is fully present under both species (historically only the wafers were offered to the laity so it’s not like they are spitting on tradition).Does America consider it legal for a minor under 21 to take communion. If so, how… because they are drinking alcohol? Just curious.
Absolutely 100% legal. Even during prohibition, churches were exempt and could buy and use sacramental wine.Does America consider it legal for a minor under 21 to take communion. If so, how… because they are drinking alcohol? Just curious.
That is vastly different than my experience. All children receive the Precious Blood at their FHC and probably half of the children receive from the Chalice when it is offered at parishes I have attended/been part of.The laws associated with alcohol in the U.S. will make your head spin. There are federal laws, and there are state laws. The rules are broken down even further, dealing with possession, sale, etc. Even though the rules vary greatly, there is an exemption for religious purposes.
In my experience, it is very rare for a minor to receive the Precious Blood. In fact, I can’t remember one instance in my entire life seeing it in person.
Huh? This is vastly different from my experience. I have never seen the cup offered at First Communion. I can’t even imagine doing that. The taste of alcohol is a learned experience and 2nd-graders being exposed to that at their FHC would seem to run a huge risk of desecration of the Precious Blood as children spit it out, possibly choke, etc. – to say nothing of getting a legion of small children to drink from the cup without spillage.That is vastly different than my experience. All children receive the Precious Blood at their FHC and probably half of the children receive from the Chalice when it is offered at parishes I have attended/been part of.
This surprises me. Far from “political suicide,” if we’ve learned anything from the current political climate, it’s that taking on the Church is at this time a career-building experience for a politician. In a liberal state like Oregon, I can truly see an ambitious politician or DA raiding a church and arresting clergy and youth volunteers for “contributing to the delinquency of a minor” or some such in connection with the use of sacramental wine.It is not legal for underage people to receive Communion wine in many US jurisdictions. It is not legal in Oregon - there is no religious (or other) exemption, and the law does not stipulate any particular quantity.
So far, no politician or prosecutor has had the gumption to take on the Church over this issue, and it’s unlikely that any ever will. It would be political suicide over an insignificant sip of wine once a week, and would likely result in nothing more than the legislature passing a religious exemption (and the ridicule and career destruction of the guy who tried to arrest priests for serving alcohol to minors).
It is required by the Church that the First Communicants be offered the Precious Blood. I will find the reference and enter it here.Huh? This is vastly different from my experience. I have never seen the cup offered at First Communion. I can’t even imagine doing that. The taste of alcohol is a learned experience and 2nd-graders being exposed to that at their FHC would seem to run a huge risk of desecration of the Precious Blood as children spit it out, possibly choke, etc. – to say nothing of getting a legion of small children to drink from the cup without spillage.
The alternative would be to have gotten the children accustomed to the taste of the wine via administering small sips of it during their FHC preparation, and I can’t imagine that, either.
It’s under adult supervision and the purpose is not to get drunk. It is legal because it is the practice of religion and the law cannot infringe on religion unless it is perverse or dangerous.Does America consider it legal for a minor under 21 to take communion. If so, how… because they are drinking alcohol? Just curious.
It isn’t and you won’t.It is required by the Church that the First Communicants be offered the Precious Blood. I will find the reference and enter it here.
I don’t know about every state but the usual laws against minors and alcohol involve sale and possession. Usually consumption of alcohol by minors is not in and of itself a violation of the law.
In a church or home setting, the minor does not possess the alcohol nor do have they bought it.
So I assume that in the Peoples Republic of Oregon it is also illegal for minors to imbibe such harmful potions as cough syrup, and food prepared with wine, sherry. bourbon or any other cooking spirit?It is not legal for underage people to receive Communion wine in many US jurisdictions. It is not legal in Oregon - there is no religious (or other) exemption, and the law does not stipulate any particular quantity.
So far, no politician or prosecutor has had the gumption to take on the Church over this issue, and it’s unlikely that any ever will. It would be political suicide over an insignificant sip of wine once a week, and would likely result in nothing more than the legislature passing a religious exemption (and the ridicule and career destruction of the guy who tried to arrest priests for serving alcohol to minors).
This.I don’t know about every state but the usual laws against minors and alcohol involve sale and possession. Usually consumption of alcohol by minors is not in and of itself a violation of the law.
In a church or home setting, the minor does not possess the alcohol nor do have they bought it.