Miracles

  • Thread starter Thread starter Faith1960
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Could you give a few examples of cases of healing of impossible illness or injuries? I’m driving myself crazy researching all this.
Someone gave a link to healings the Church has accepted. I don’t know what else I could supply.

But as to why God heals some afflictions and not others, or ones that seem “impossible”, it is most likely because he wants us to walk by faith and not by sight. This is not the say that faith is simply believing without any proofs or outside of reason, but rather that God wants us to trust him whether we receive good things or bad, understand or not, have doubts or not.

Trusting God in all things is like a child trusting a beloved parent even when the child has to undergo trials beyond his understanding, such a hospital visits or obeying his parents rules, etc. Rarely does God do miraculous things just because he can. Everything he does is for our soul’s good, even if he allows our bodies, minds, souls, and spirits to suffer. Jesus himself suffered greatly in mind, body, soul, and spirit, but he knew that his Father’s will was best for him and for us.

So, don’t worry about what God can do that he doesn’t do. He knows what he’s doing even when we don’t or we don’t understand.
 
My Bible study teacher said that amputees remain without their missing limbs because of Original Sin, like someone said above, life won’t be perfect due to OS. Okay, I get that, but then why does God cure cancers and MS or put them into remission, even at times without prayer but won’t restore a limb?

I found a Catholic blog where he blogger mentioned 4 cases of saints who restored body parts due to miracles and said there were more miracles like these and told readers to consult the Congregation for the Causes of Saints (I think that was the name) but most of it is in French and Spanish and I was lost on the site anyway.

I also found an old post on here about this subject by a poster who hasn’t been active on CAF in a long time, who said there have been missing limbs restored miraculously, but didn’t tell us more about it.

Can someone provide some instance where God did restore missing limbs?

Or if not, can someone address what my Bible study teacher said and why OS isn’t preventing God from healing other maladies?
 
My Bible study teacher said that amputees remain without their missing limbs because of Original Sin, like someone said above, life won’t be perfect due to OS. Okay, I get that, but then why does God cure cancers and MS or put them into remission, even at times without prayer but won’t restore a limb?

I found a Catholic blog where he blogger mentioned 4 cases of saints who restored body parts due to miracles and said there were more miracles like these and told readers to consult the Congregation for the Causes of Saints (I think that was the name) but most of it is in French and Spanish and I was lost on the site anyway.

I also found an old post on here about this subject by a poster who hasn’t been active on CAF in a long time, who said there have been missing limbs restored miraculously, but didn’t tell us more about it.

Can someone provide some instance where God did restore missing limbs?

Or if not, can someone address what my Bible study teacher said and why OS isn’t preventing God from healing other maladies?
I think the OS question is the most important issue here. I think your teacher was speculating or didn’t explain it as thoroughly as may be. All of us have suffered because of OS. We were not meant to suffer diseases, but due to the fall, man became vulnerable to maladies and other defects. The loss of a limb is not a malady or genetic defect but is caused by accidents or to save a life due to some illness. So, it’s an accident of nature not something we inherited due to our fallen condition.

I think God doesn’t usually restore limbs because it is not a disease that is fatal. Most accepted healings are for fatal cases–ones in which the person would had died if not healed.

As for remission of symptoms, even doctors cannot explain them, and most natural remissions aren’t life long, but are temporary. Those healings that the Church accepts must be permanent in nature not temporary.
 
Now I just found something that says Jesus didn’t restore a severed off ear, that it was just cut but still attached. He really restored a full. It off ear, right?
 
Now I just found something that says Jesus didn’t restore a severed off ear, that it was just cut but still attached. He really restored a full. It off ear, right?
The passage says plainly that the ear was cut off and Jesus restored it. Why read sources that say things other than what is plainly written?

Matt.26[51] And behold, one of those who were with Jesus stretched out his hand and drew his sword, and struck the slave of the high priest, and cut off his ear.

Mark.14[47] But one of those who stood by drew his sword, and struck the slave of the high priest and cut off his ear.

Luke.22[50] And one of them struck the slave of the high priest and cut off his right ear.
[51] But Jesus said, “No more of this!” And he touched his ear and healed him.

Jesus did this to reinforce that he was “I AM,” to teach Peter and the others that the kingdom was not to be won by the sword, and out of compassion for the poor man.
 
The passage says plainly that the ear was cut off and Jesus restored it. Why read sources that say things other than what is plainly written?
.
I stumbled upon it while driving myself crazy trying to find some instances of body parts and limbs having been restored through the goodness of God.
 
There is a difference between reattaching a live body part that has just been cut from the body (even modern science can do that) , versus restoring a limb that has been amputated due to disease, or been crushed, mangled, etc.

While the way our LORD healed the Roman’s ear in Gethsemane was a fortiori a miracle for that time, it really is not an answer to the OP’s question.

ICXC NIKA
 
I stumbled upon it while driving myself crazy trying to find some instances of body parts and limbs having been restored through the goodness of God.
There are all sorts of useless speculations floating around, aren’t there? It’s one reason CAF was founded–to help people get some good info. 😃
40.png
GEddie:
There is a difference between reattaching a live body part that has just been cut from the body (even modern science can do that) , versus restoring a limb that has been amputated due to disease, or been crushed, mangled, etc.

While the way our LORD healed the Roman’s ear in Gethsemane was a fortiori a miracle for that time, it really is not an answer to the OP’s question.

ICXC NIKA
She wanted to know, so I answered. :tiphat:
 
There is a difference between reattaching a live body part that has just been cut from the body (even modern science can do that) , versus restoring a limb that has been amputated due to disease, or been crushed, mangled, etc.

While the way our LORD healed the Roman’s ear in Gethsemane was a fortiori a miracle for that time, it really is not an answer to the OP’s question.

ICXC NIKA
Jesus healing the Romans ear happened a LONG time ago but other than that, how is His restoring a cut off ear any different than reattaching a finger, toe or leg?
 
I found these questions and answers on another site I stumbled on. I think John Oakes is a fundamentalist. I haven’t read his entire site but just zeroed in on some of the questions pertaining to our discussion.

I think he has some good explanations on this topic. He specifically addresses amputees but I think his reply to the question about “Why is the Holy Spirit Not Active Today As During the Old and New Testaments?” answers this topic even better than the question where he addresses the question about amputees.

<<<<<<< Why is the Holy Spirit not active today as during the Old and New Testaments?

Question:

The Holy Spirit was pretty active during the Old and New Testaments of the Bible. Seems the Holy Spirit has not been very active in past 2000 years. Your thoughts on this? Am I wrong in thinking this?

Answer:

The Holy Spirit has been extremely busy the past two thousand years–convicting people of sin, guiding them into the truth (John 16:7-10, John 14:15-18), interceding for us when we pray (Romans 8:26-27) and many other things. I think what you are saying is that for the past 1900 years or so, the Holy Spirit has not been working through public, physical miracles, as He did during the ministry of Jesus and in the very early church. If that is what you are saying, then you are correct. But please do not think that the main work of the Holy Spirit is in the form of the miraculous.

If you look at the Old and the New Testament you will discover that throughout most of the history of God’s people, there were few miracles. Pretty much the only time when significant miracles are recorded is in times when God was giving new revelation. The miraculous is recorded principally during the ministry of Moses and Joshua, as well as during the ministry of Elijah and Elishah. Otherwise, the miraculous was rare in the Old Testament. Miracles are not used by God to convince people to become a Christian, but to validate that the message is from God. This is what Jesus said during his ministry (John 10:25, 32, 38). The writer of Hebrews tells us that the purpose of miracles (or at least one of the purposes) is to testify to and confirm the message (Hebrews 2:4). The reason the miraculous gifts were given to the early church (or at least one of the reasons) was to testify to the validity of the message taught by the apostles and other inspired teachers at a time when the New Testament was not yet complete.

The Holy Spirit is very active today. He works in many ways in the lives of Christians as well as working to convict those who are not saved. However, because we have the completed Words of God, the Spirit does not normally work through physical miracles today.

I hope this helps.

John Oakes

Why does God not heal amputees?
Answer:

God can and even has healed people with disfigured limbs. There are a number of examples in the gospels of Jesus healing a man who had been unable to walk for 38 years (John 5:1-15), a crippled man who was let down through a roof to where Jesus taught (Mark 2:1-11) and others. The question is not whether God can heal amputees or any other physical disability for that matter. The question is whether he will do so in any particular case.

From God’s perspective, our problem is not physical disability. It is spiritual disability. Illness, pain and even death are not what concerns God. His concern is our spiritual health. Jesus makes this clear in John 9. Here he heals a man born blind. He does this, not so much out of pity for the man’s blindness, although obviously God cares about our physical suffering as well. He healed the man so that it might bring glory to God (John 9:4). After the healing, Jesus said to the man who had been healed, “I came into the world for judgment, in order that thowe who do not see will see and those who do see will become blind.” Some of the Pharisees wo were wit hhim head these things and asked Him, “We aren’t blind too, are we?” “If you were blind,” Jesus said, “you wouldn’t have sin. But now that you say ‘We see’–your sin remains.” (John 9:39-41). In other words, these hypocrites who are able to see physically are blind spiritually to their own sin problem. Because they claim they can see, they remain blind. Jesus’ concern is always for us to be cured of spiritual blindness. Jesus is not terrifically concerned if we are unable to walk physically, but whether we can walk with God spiritually.

It is not that Jesus did not care (and God does not care still today) about physical ailments. God cares about this, but he will not work a miracle just to impress people. Paul had a physical impairment of some kind. He asked God several times to remove the physical problem, but God said no. He said “My power is made perfect is weakness.” (2 Corinthians 12:7-10). God did not see a physical limitation as a spiritual limitation for Paul and therefore he did not heal him, despite being asked in tears. Jesus said that it would be better for us to go to heaven crippled than to enter Hell having had a perfectly healthy body (Mark 9:42-48). I believe Jesus was quite serious about this.

So, God can heal amputees if he so chooses. However, that is apparently not his usual way of working apparently. I had a friend in college who had been an outstanding athlethe. He had an accident which resulted in his loss of the use of his legs. He told me that if not for this accident he would most likely never have woken up spiritually and been saved. He felt that although he was very sad for the loss of the use of his legs, it was worth it if it lead to his salvation.

By the way, I have a book published about the miracles of Jesus which goes into this question in more detail. It is called. "
That You May Believe." It is available at www.ipibooks.com.

John >>>>>>>>>
 
The passage says plainly that the ear was cut off and Jesus restored it. Why read sources that say things other than what is plainly written?

Matt.26[51] And behold, one of those who were with Jesus stretched out his hand and drew his sword, and struck the slave of the high priest, and cut off his ear.

Mark.14[47] But one of those who stood by drew his sword, and struck the slave of the high priest and cut off his ear.

Luke.22[50] And one of them struck the slave of the high priest and cut off his right ear.
[51] But Jesus said, “No more of this!” And he touched his ear and healed him.

Jesus did this to reinforce that he was “I AM,” to teach Peter and the others that the kingdom was not to be won by the sword, and out of compassion for the poor man.
In looking at my Bible and three of the Gospels that speak of this, only Luke says Jesus healed him. Did he really heal his cut off ear even though it’s only mentioned in Luke?
 
Again, this is not a Catholic site, but Oakes’ answers have been helpful to me.

evidenceforchristianity.org/category/questions-and-answers/qaa-miracles/page/2/

<<<<<<<<< Question:
I want to learn from you Please help me:
Can you please help about Miracles? One of my friends says ‘“ou people don’t believe miracles.” I told him I believe when we pray God answers our prayers he heals, and I told him we need to consult doctors too. I Answered him,

When Jesus was on this earth he showed compassion on sick, lame, mute and etc,. he willing touched them and healed them. After he gave that power to 72 and 12 apostles and to the apostle Paul and they did miracles as Jesus did.
Jesus gave the power to do miracles to them and they did, but the same they cannot pass to anybody.
  1. What about eating sacrificed to the Idols? (In India its called Prassadam/Prasad)
    Looking forward for your Help…
Answer:
About miracles, the New Testament describes Jesus working miracles, of course. At the end of his ministry, he breathed on the apostles, giving them the Holy Spirit (John 20:22). Jesus gave the apostles the ability to work miracles, signs and wonders. This can be seen through many examples. One of these is Acts 3:1-10. Jesus also gave the ability to the apostles to, when they laid their hands on people, to pass on the ability to work various kinds of miracles, such as healing, tongues, prophecy, etc. This can be shown using Acts 8:9-25. Here Phillip could not pass on the gifts of the Holy Spirit, but had to send to Jerusalem for an apostle to come to Samaria to give the ability to work miracles. The most reasonable conclusion of these passages (many others could be mentioned) is that the ability to work various miracles in the early history of the church was restricted to Jesus, to the apostles and to those the apostles laid hands on to impart miraculous ability. The scripture tells us that these miracles were done to give testimony to the gospel message (Hebrews 2:3-4). Because the New Testament is complete, there is no logical reason for these miraculous gifts to continue.
Does this mean that God is not doing miracles today? No, but it means that the way God is working miracles today is qualitiatively different than he did in the first century when he was still revealing his inspired message to the apostles. I really do not know for sure if God is doing miraculous healings today. However, I believe that he does and that it is a great idea for Christians to pray to God to intervene in hard situations. However, the promise of miracles such as those in the New Testament is not there. If a Christian or a non-Christian friend has a sickness, we should consult doctors, but we should also pray. This is a biblical way of acting (James 5:13-16)
About eating meat sacrificed to idols, Paul dealt with this question in 1 Corinthians 8. Paul said that an idol is nothing, and therefore, food sacrificed to nothing (ie and idol) is nothing different than other food. Idols are nothing, so meat sacrificed to idols is meat sacrificed to nothing at all. It is not sinful to eat such meat. However, you should read this passage carefully. Paul said that for some (weaker) Christians, they cannot understand that it is not sinful to eat meat sacrificed to an idol. For them, it seems to be sinful. Paul says that if eating meat sacrificed to idols is a stumbling block to a weaker Christian, then he would not eat meat sacrificed to idols. 1 Corinthians 8:11-13 makes this clear. So, when it comes to meat sacrificed to idols there in India, it is not sinful, per se, to eat such meat because an idol is nothing. However, if there is any chance that doing so would be a stumbling block to a fellow disicple of Jesus, or a stumbling block to a non-Christian, you will be wise to not eat such meat. This is a grey area. You should seek advice on this from local wise disciples. I say this because, not knowing the local culture, I am not in a good position to be able to give you strong advice. This is a grey area (ie it is not a matter of absolutely clear cut doctrine), so you should seek the best wisdom, along with thinking for yourself how best to apply 1 Corinthians 8 to the situation.
John Oakes, PhD >>>>>>>>>>>
 
In looking at my Bible and three of the Gospels that speak of this, only Luke says Jesus healed him. Did he really heal his cut off ear even though it’s only mentioned in Luke?
Really? Of course it means Jesus healed him. If you are going to re-question every answer you will never settle in the faith. You have no good reason to doubt God’s goodness, so don’t do it. I’m sorry if I sound impatient, but there comes a time when we have to say we believe and go from there–when the evidence is plain and clear. I hope you resolve your issues. I am signing off.
 
Really? Of course it means Jesus healed him. If you are going to re-question every answer you will never settle in the faith. You have no good reason to doubt God’s goodness, so don’t do it. I’m sorry if I sound impatient, but there comes a time when we have to say we believe and go from there–when the evidence is plain and clear. I hope you resolve your issues. I am signing off.
Wow.:eek: I’ve been nothing but polite to you, so, bye.
 
In an attempt to understand your line of questioning better, could you tell us why you are fixated on limbs and not other tragic losses?
Probably because few physical harms, short of death, are irreversible, but limb loss is; while limb regeneration in human life, if proven, would be an indubitable miracle?

ICXC NIKA
 
Probably because few physical harms, short of death, are irreversible, but limb loss is; while limb regeneration in human life, if proven, would be an indubitable miracle?

ICXC NIKA
I can think of others. PM if you wish.
 
In an attempt to understand your line of questioning better, could you tell us why you are fixated on limbs and not other tragic losses?
Because the non believers question about why God doesn’t cure amputees is true. If He did, we’d all witness a miracle that couldn’t be explained in any other way - not spontaneous remission, the illness having run it’s course, or some medical explanation scientists haven’t yet found the answer to.
 
Probably because few physical harms, short of death, are irreversible, but limb loss is; while limb regeneration in human life, if proven, would be an indubitable miracle?

ICXC NIKA
You said it much better than I did. Thanks.
 
I can think of others. PM if you wish.
Of course, and so can I, but remission of illness owing to failure of body organs or senses or even brain damage can be attributed to natural processes (provided the organs, etc, remain in the body).

Once a limb is off the body (or the eye is out of the head, etc) no healing is naturally possible, therefore if it occurred it would be an indubitable miracle.

ICXC NIKA
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top