I
Isa_Almisry
Guest
The fact is that the Bible was originally in three languages. The fact is that it has been given to all nations with multiple translations. The fact is that there are thousands of copies of the mansucripts, of various sects. And yet when you compare them all, the fact is is that they differences are in main negligible, and those that are not (e.g. the Jews insisting the Masoretic 'almah means “young girl,” not virgin as the pre-Christian LXX “parthenos” definitely does, btw, the Quran agrees with the LXX. Note I said, “agrees,” not “confirms”) are easy to explane.I have addressed this in some other thread (can’t remember where), but the idea about some “original version” of the Bible that is in one language that we should all read if we want to truly follow our scriptures is really silly. The Bible was NOT written in one language, so OF COURSE there are translations, because not all Christians can speak Greek, Aramaic, AND Hebrew! These ARE the original languages that the Bible was written in! With respect, Planten, this is not a good way to address the Bible, as it was not revealed in large chunks to ONE man in ONE language in the way of the Qur’an.
Whether or not that makes the Bible more or less authentic to you is your perogative, but please stop repeating this argument as though it is meaningful. It makes about as much sense as saying that the Qur’an is not from God because we all know God would have reallyyy revealed his message in English only…![]()
According to the Muslims themselves, the caliph gathered the Quran in one edition, made into 4 copies, and then ordered the rest to BE DESTOYED. And yet the Quran has at least 7 (or 10, or 14 depending on who you ask) recensions of the Quran, not to mention the varients that were destroyed (you can see them in Jeffrey, Material for the History of the of the Text of the Quran, based on Muslim sources
answering-islam.org/Books/Jeffery/Materials/index.htm
Now we find early copies of the text in the mosque of Sanaa in Yemen, in rock inscriptions, on the Dome of the Rock, etc and no, they do not match. Most of the differences are also negligible, but the Muslims claim no letter has changed.
So the Bible, from scattered sources is basically one, whereas the Quran, allegedly from one source (and in one language, early translations also show more differences) is not uniform.
Hmm.