I understand why one would consider spartan churches suitable for monasteries, yet here in Europe one finds some of the most exquisite churches to be active or former abbeys. Ottobeuren Abbey is one example, as is St. Emmeram’s Abbey in Regensburg. My first post here included pictures of the latter from when I visited. Another one is attached to this post. Both of these examples are Benedictine monasteries.
Would it not also be equally understandable though, for monasteries to have really wonderful churches, such as these examples? My reasoning would be thus: Churches are for God, dedicated to Him directly or through one of His Saints, they do not glorify those who worship in them. Since being austere is part of a monk’s life, doesn’t a beautiful church emphasise precisely that? When we are in the world, we are poor. But when we are in heaven (of which the church is a symbol), we behold God’s glory.
Check out some other monasteries both active and former:
- Kloster Bronnbach
- Kloster Wald (Baden-Württemberg)
- Erzabtei Beuron
- Abtei Neresheim
- Comburg (Großcomburg)
- Kloster St. Peter auf dem Schwarzwald
- Kloster Wiblingen
- Kloster Zwiefalten
Most of these are Benedictine, and really jewels to behold. Some are huge monasteries (oh, the days!) with great lands around, forests, gardens…