Modest swimwear as an example for my daughter

  • Thread starter Thread starter Serap
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
When I say sexy, I mean cute and fashionable; feminine, but modest. When I say sexy, I am talking about it like a slang word for “cute”. Take out all my “sexy” words and replace them with “cute” and you have what I really mean.
I got what you meant. And honestly, I don’t see why you can’t feel cute or sexy or sassy in that modest swimsuit. I think we get too uptight sometimes about feeling attractive. I think its a healthy attitude to have personally.
 
For the first time in YEARS, I have to get a swimsuit, as we are going to be spending a few days in Bermuda in late June and dh wants to spend at least a little time on the pretty pink beaches there. I think those swimdresses are adorable, and someone had a link showing a suit with a tank top and “boy shorts”. I think those are about as daring as I plan to get! 😉

Our girls wore tankinis, or fairly modest two-pieces (none of those horribly small bikinis). They were simply more comfortable that way, and didn’t want to call unwanted attention to themselves.

To each her own.*** I don’t think we have to dress like Muslims, however, to be “modest”. It is beachwear, for heaven’s sake. As long as our behinds and bosoms aren’t on obvious display, I think we’re good. ***🙂
*Dear dixieagle,

It is interesting that you bring this up and not to derail this thread but. I ponder a lot these days if maybe Muslims and Orthodox Jews understand and try to preserve the dignity and respect of womanhood better that us catholics. *
 
For the first time in YEARS, I have to get a swimsuit, as we are going to be spending a few days in Bermuda in late June and dh wants to spend at least a little time on the pretty pink beaches there. I think those swimdresses are adorable, and someone had a link showing a suit with a tank top and “boy shorts”. I think those are about as daring as I plan to get! 😉

Our girls wore tankinis, or fairly modest two-pieces (none of those horribly small bikinis). They were simply more comfortable that way, and didn’t want to call unwanted attention to themselves.

To each her own. I don’t think we have to dress like Muslims, however, to be “modest”. It is beachwear, for heaven’s sake. As long as our behinds and bosoms aren’t on obvious display, I think we’re good. 🙂
I agree. And after DD going through the safety course for swimming at our local Y, I didn’t realize some of the safety concerns the longer skirts and certain materials of the more covered swimsuits can impose. The YMCA aquatic director will not allow any child to take lessons if they have the skrits, a few years back a girl got the skirt caught on the diving board and ending up smacking her head in the process. Plus if the suit has too much material, it can tire the swimmer too much and that can be a safety concern when swimming in the ocean.
 
I didn’t see anything mentioned here about it, but has anyone thought about those surfer type suits? They have a name, I’m sure, I just don’t know what it is. I don’t swim or surf myself, but as I recall, they’re usually a one-piece that covers from the upper thigh to the neck with a zipper in front to close. But, I’m not sure on the fabric of them…it could be more wet-suit like in which case it really wouldn’t be conducive to regular swimming. As an aside, I like the original poster’s swimsuit choices 🙂
 
😃
*Dear Serap,

I thought we were supposed to be dressing according to how God perceives we should be dressing. Not how we perceive God wants us to dress.
*

Especially if we are religious.👍

My only question to this would be; why are we basing what we wear according to “cuteness”, “fashoin”, and “compromises”? Who comes up with what is considered cute and fashionable or a good compromise?
Deciding what one wears bassed on this criteria reminds me of the story of “The Emporer’s New Clothes.”


*I looked up the word “cute” and I do not believe I like that word much more than I like the word “sexy.” Will have to ponder this a little more.

I still like the word “dignified” and “respectful” and for some reason I am not comfortable with wearing something that looks like my underwear or nightgown in public. I do not believe I am either “dignified” or “respectful” of who and what God made me to be.
OK…now you’re starting to offend me…a little. I think you mean well, but now you’re beginning to step on my internet feet 😉

I respect that you seek to satisfy God, but please don’t pull others into your journey and make them feel as though they are some how failing God by wearing a modest swimdress even if it is cute and fashionable at the same time.

I think you set out to begin a debate with me from the beginning. Fooey on you 😃
 
I still like the word “dignified” and “respectful” and for some reason I am not comfortable with wearing something that looks like my underwear or nightgown in public. I do not believe I am either “dignified” or “respectful” of who and what God made me to be.
Then goody for you - you have it all figured out for you and yours then.
😃

OK…now you’re starting to offend me…a little. I think you mean well, but now you’re beginning to step on my internet feet 😉

I respect that you seek to satisfy God, but please don’t pull others into your journey and make them feel as though they are some how failing God by wearing a modest swimdress even if it is cute and fashionable at the same time.

I think you set out to begin a debate with me from the beginning. Fooey on you 😃
You totally nailed it. I think if this person wants a debate she needs to start her own thread. As to the OP I think the suits chosen are very nice (trying to not use any offending or loaded words :rolleyes: ).

~Liza
 
I think the important thing to keep in mind here is the OP’s intent – to serve as an example of modesty for her daughter. In my mind, I think the suits she has chosen will do an excellent job of that. Many mothers wouldn’t think twice to worry about it. IMO (and forgive me if this sounds harsh, as I don’t intend it that way), I find the very long, un-typical modest suits wind up being almost immodest. Here’s why: Yes, they cover more skin – but can you call it “modest” if what you’re wearing draws everyone’s attention to you? I think Serap’s choices cover everything nicely and are typical enough that they wouldn’t draw any unusual amount of attention. But, that’s just my opinion.
 
Serap, I really like those - the second ones moreso than the first ones.

I ONLY will wear swimdresses, because I’m very conscious of my thighs and butt. I just picked up two swimdresses (one’s a two piece with a fluttery tankini and a skirt) at Ross for $30 total…

LOVE them. If these didn’t exist I would never swim!
 
My only question to this would be; why are we basing what we wear according to “cuteness”, “fashoin”, and “compromises”? Who comes up with what is considered cute and fashionable or a good compromise?
Deciding what one wears bassed on this criteria reminds me of the story of “The Emporer’s New Clothes.”
*

*I looked up the word “cute” and I do not believe I like that word much more than I like the word “sexy.” Will have to ponder this a little more.

I still like the word “dignified” and “respectful” and for some reason I am not comfortable with wearing something that looks like my underwear or nightgown in public. I do not believe I am either “dignified” or “respectful” of who and what God made me to be.
I looked it up… the word cute means; Attractive or pretty espeically in a childish, youthful or delicate way.

That’s me… it’s how I view myself, and it’s how others view me. I an young at heart… I’m silly, I’m carefree, I’m happy almost always, and I don’t take myself very seriously. Plus I have a small frame. I’d never be described as beautiful or sexy… always just cute. I was a cute kid, a cute young mom, now I’m a cute old mom, and God willing, I’ll be cute when I’m 80. I think it’s attitude more than anything.

OK, now I looked up dignified: It said having dignity, which means: The quality or state of being worthy, honored or esteemed. High rank, office or position. Formal reserve or seriousness of manner, appearance, or language.

I couldn’t be that if I tried. It’s just not me.

So you dress in a manner that matches your personality —> dignified. And I dress in a way that matches mine ----> cute. God made us differently and neither personality type or style is better than the other. Obviously God like variety… he made us all so differently.
 
😃

OK…now you’re starting to offend me…a little. I think you mean well, but now you’re beginning to step on my internet feet 😉

I respect that you seek to satisfy God, but please don’t pull others into your journey and make them feel as though they are some how failing God by wearing a modest swimdress even if it is cute and fashionable at the same time.

I think you set out to begin a debate with me from the beginning. Fooey on you 😃
*Dear Serap,

I apologize, I did not mean to offend you.:o
It was not my intention to debate this just to discus it.😃
I truly do just want to understand more fully what God requires of us. *
 
*Dear dixieagle,

It is interesting that you bring this up and not to derail this thread but. I ponder a lot these days if maybe Muslims and Orthodox Jews understand and try to preserve the dignity and respect of womanhood better that us catholics. *
I don’t think one has to be covered head to toe to be modest and wholesome in one’s dress.
 
I looked it up… the word cute means; Attractive or pretty espeically in a childish, youthful or delicate way.

That’s me… it’s how I view myself, and it’s how others view me. I an young at heart… I’m silly, I’m carefree, I’m happy almost always, and I don’t take myself very seriously. Plus I have a small frame. I’d never be described as beautiful or sexy… always just cute. I was a cute kid, a cute young mom, now I’m a cute old mom, and God willing, I’ll be cute when I’m 80. I think it’s attitude more than anything.

OK, now I looked up dignified: It said having dignity, which means: The quality or state of being worthy, honored or esteemed. High rank, office or position. Formal reserve or seriousness of manner, appearance, or language.

I couldn’t be that if I tried. It’s just not me.

So you dress in a manner that matches your personality —> dignified. And I dress in a way that matches mine ----> cute. God made us differently and neither personality type or style is better than the other. Obviously God like variety… he made us all so differently.
*Dear yellowbird,

This is funny, out of five girls in the family I was considered the “cute” one too.
I may not take myself too seriously but I do take God seriously. In doing this I then think I start looking at my choices and decisions more seriously.
I believe you are correct, God does like variety, but I wonder about how we are taking that.*
 
Then goody for you - you have it all figured out for you and yours then.

~Liza
Well, I would not say I had it all figured out other wise I do not believe I would be here trying to understand what is or is not considered modest.
 
*Dear Serap,

I thought we were supposed to be dressing according to how God perceives we should be dressing. Not how we perceive God wants us to dress.
*
Unless one has supernatural insight into God’s mind, we can only do our best to “perceive” what God wants.
*I looked up the word “cute” and I do not believe I like that word much more than I like the word “sexy.” Will have to ponder this a little more. *
Nothing at all wrong with “cute” (appealing, attractive, pretty) We are not required to look like trolls.
 
I don’t think one has to be covered head to toe to be modest and wholesome in one’s dress.
*You could be right. I do not know for sure. What I am trying to figure out is how does God want us to be modest. *
 
i have wondered about muslim dress also – it seems i get ‘checked out’ by guys no matter what i’m wearing – would this total coverage lessen that? if it would get males to respect us more and not just see us as bodies so often, i would be willing to change to their way of dress. but i would have to move far north – hot flashes come even in shorts and a light tee here in PA! (yes, i’m young to be having them)
 
I think the important thing to keep in mind here is the OP’s intent – to serve as an example of modesty for her daughter. In my mind, I think the suits she has chosen will do an excellent job of that. Many mothers wouldn’t think twice to worry about it. IMO (and forgive me if this sounds harsh, as I don’t intend it that way), I find the very long, un-typical modest suits wind up being almost immodest. Here’s why: Yes, they cover more skin --** but can you call it “modest” if what you’re wearing draws everyone’s attention to you? **I think Serap’s choices cover everything nicely and are typical enough that they wouldn’t draw any unusual amount of attention. But, that’s just my opinion.
*Dear Irish Girl,

I believe this is really a very good point.
It shows how that no matter how “good” the intent may be there is always a question. Am I doing this for my vanity or for God’s glory. Even if we believe it is right it can become totally corrupted because of our pride.*
 
Unless one has supernatural insight into God’s mind, we can only do our best to “perceive” what God wants.
*So how do we “perceive” what God wants? *
Nothing at all wrong with “cute” (appealing, attractive, pretty) We are not required to look like trolls.
Hmmm, I do not think I ever said anything about having to look like a troll to dress how God desires us to dress.
 
*So how do we “perceive” what God wants? *

Hmmm, I do not think I ever said anything about having to look like a troll to dress how God desires us to dress.
I may be wrong about this, but I know at least I am taking exception to some of the words you are using, such as “we”, “us” and so on as you ponder about modesty and the current topic in this thread. I really don’t want YOU deciding for ME what is appropriate for ME to wear to be modest. It is right to ponder and discern, but you may have a total different definition of modesty than I do and I wouldn’t want to impose my definition of modesty on you anymore than I would want you to impose your definition on me.

I do think we can all agree on the basic components of modest, to cover our butts and our bust lines, but after that, it can get tricky and people can be offended.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top