Mohammad, The Natural Successor To Christ

[un_dhimmi]

Briton, are you Catholic or even Christian ?

 

[Briton]

Would that matter much to you?
I will just tell you after you satisfy my curiosity. Why are you asking?

 

[un_dhimmi]

Because if you are Catholic you seem to have a strange way of upholding your faith… including holding mohammed as the natural successor to Christ.

Doesn’t matter either way, answer if you wish.

 

[Shenango]

Briton:

Who are Dr Greene and Dr Lomax?

Abdul Rahim Greene, and Abdul Rahman Lomax. They’ve done many debates, and written much in defense of Islam. May God reward them handsomely.

 

[Jesusisgod]

Briton, I have personally read the Qur’an.

You have a more authoritative islamic book than that? Yet I can tell you that the efforts to link Muhammad to Christ is downright dumb. And those who can be affected by islamic texts are scripturally un-sound.

Why?

See Luke16:16.

Jesus Himself said “The Law and the Prophets were until John (the baptist)”.

Which essentially means muhammad was a fake.

Secondly, in the book of John it says that God sent Jesus to save mankind, that the world through Him might be saved. The scripture says that there is no other name under heaven that can save mankind. Now, did Muhammad preach Jesus? No, Muhammad preached himself and his pagan idol, allah.

Thirdly, who is allah? archaelogists have long proven that allah is a pagan moon idol. Whether the muslims who are prostating themselves in ancient moon worship styles and observing the lunar calendar and having the crescent moon atop their mosques are willing to accept these evidences or not is their choice. But for us who are sane and logical, these hard evidences should be very apparent.

Believe it or not, the reason we don’t see is because we are blind.

biblebelievers.org.au/moongod.htm

PS. If we go a step further, we will see that the battle at armageddon IS BETWEEN CHRISTIANS AND MUSLIMS. Cos allah is the ancient beast. The islamic trademark halal can be found in the book of Isaiah 14 as Heylel. Which is translated in its original texts as Heylel ben Shachar, son of the dawn - Lucifer.

Are you worried for your soul? Then do some homework.

.

 

[Valke2]

Briton,

I can appreciate why you’re posting this…but for those Catholic members who read this, I just have the following to say as a Muslim.

Ahmed Deedat’s work is often quoted and cited by Muslims in polemic-apologetic debate with Christians. While he can occasionally make good points, much of his work is shoddy and poorly thought-out (and written) in nature. It’s not scholarly, and his arguments are often nothing but conjecture, hardly based on real evidence. And while I agree with most of his ultimate conclusions, since they are orthodox positons in Islam (Muhammad (PBUH) was prophecied by Jesus (PBUH), Jesus (PBUH) wasn’t crucified etc.), I don’t stand for his shoddy, half-baked scholarship, and I know other Muslims don’t as well. I wouldn’t hold his work up as an example to Christians; I never have and I never will.

Deedat’s work represents an old world style of sloppy, crude scholarship (if one can even call it that), in which integrity was not scrupulously quested for, and which cannot withstand the test of modern analysis and criticism. It is often an embarassment to intelligent and critically-thinking people.

I’d like to think the fellow Muslims who do make use of his work do so because much of it is free and widely available in pamphlets, booklets etc., not because of its high integrity.

The point that I wish people to take home here is that Muslims are capable of much more profound thought, argumentation and scholarship than that of Deedat’s, though one mostly still has to pay for it in the form of books and magazines (though the Islamic Awareness organization is quickly becoming the online benchmark for such intelligent scholarship, with a few other rising stars).

Yes, one should “see how others think to try to understand them”, but Catholics reading this work would be ill-advised to consider Muslims a monolith, and generally of this low-caliber of thinking. That’s so no one is surprised when they run into a knowledgeable Muslim. That’s all, folks.

Good points.