Mohicans, Braveheart, and Titanic!

  • Thread starter Thread starter Pearl_of_Tyburn
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Braveheart was awful.

It was extremely Anglophobic and all the people were portrayed wrong.

Also certain actors (Mel Gibson) should stick to certain roles.

Titanic was long and boring, I prefer A Night to Remember, much better in my opinion.

I cannot remember much about the Mohican film except some woman stepping off a liff towards the end.
 
Hello Pearl of Tyburn

Couldnt comment on the first two in question but Titanic, I thought gave out a really important message. { Such joy at the start and then the reality of mans confidence in a false kind of providence way } . ( hopefully )

Enjoy your day … .
 
I quite liked Braveheart when I saw bits and pieces of it for the first time recently. I liked Titanic when it first came out but I’ve seen it too many times now, doubt I’d want to watch it again. Never heard of the other one.
 
Mohicans - i liked it - though i think the book is better. It gave a good insight into those times, which was like a stepping point - after seeing the movie i went on to research the history behind it and learnt lots more.

Same with Braveheart and Titanic really.

To be honest though, whenever i watch Titanic, i just skip all the romantic parts and go straight to the sinking ship. I also just like to see the clothes of that time 😃

I hate how they changed the facts in Braveheart and Titanic though - i mean both movies could have been just as good - if not better, if they stuck to the facts! And gave real accounts of real people who survived Titanic! Like Frank Prentice and charles joughin! i would have loved to have seen them in the movie. Forget the whole romance part.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top