Mom's Lesbian Wedding

  • Thread starter Thread starter rbrandon
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
It’s telling that of all the sexual sins, homosexual activity seems to be the only one with a militant group insisting that the Roman Catholic Church redefine it as “not sinful, but loving.” Theres no comparable effort to legitimize masturbation, or incest, or bestiality, or even heterosexual fornication…or any other mortal sexual sin. Not even.
I’m not so sure about that. It seems to me that mitigating factors—i.e., excuses—are increasingly being proposed for all sorts of sexual sin. What is new is that something which is by nature non-marital—same sex relations—is being redefined as marital. Without sexual complementarity, there can be nothing marital about it. It’s not marriage because the biology doesn’t work.
 
Yes, the false appropriation of marriage certainly is distinctive to the militant homosexual movement. Unfortunately, for Catholics to do so adds sacrilege to heresy.
 
Is it God or is it the other guy talking? God has made it clear what He thinks of gay marriage.
 
I guess it might be the misguided human soul? I always seem to get in the way of my sanctification.
 
I take responsibility for my own sins, and repent them. I don’t agitate for the Church to declassify them as sins, so I can delude myself.
 
Last edited:
He presents evil as good and good as evil, and you’ve accused people of being divisive, who in reality are following Christ rather than pleasing others.
 
Indeed he does. He’s been doing that since he convinced the rebellious angels to follow him, yes?
 
Last edited:
I don’t believe I have - I understand where they are coming from, I just ask the same.
 
2 And the Pharisees and the scribes grumbled, saying, b“This man receives sinners and eats with them.”

36 One of the Pharisees asked him to eat with him, and he went into the Pharisee’s house and reclined at table. 37 And behold, a woman of the city, who was a sinner, when she learned that he was reclining at table in the Pharisee’s house, brought an alabaster flask of ointment, 38 and standing behind him at his feet, weeping, she began to wet his feet with her tears and wiped them with the hair of her head and kissed his feet and anointed them with the ointment. 39 Now when the Pharisee who had invited him saw this, he said to himself, “If this man were a prophet, he would have known who and what sort of woman this is who is touching him, for she is a sinner.”

He entered Jericho and was passing through. 2 And behold, there was a man named Zacchaeus. He was a chief tax collector and was rich. 3 And dhe was seeking to see who Jesus was, but on account of the crowd he could not, because he was small in stature. 4 So he ran on ahead and climbed up into ea sycamore tree to see him, for he was about to pass that way. 5 And when Jesus came to the place, he looked up and said to him, “Zacchaeus, hurry and come down, for fI must stay at your house today.” 6 So he hurried and came down and received him joyfully. 7 And when they saw it, they all hgrumbled, “He has gone in to be the guest of a man who is a sinner.” 8
 
Last edited:
I don’t identify myself with Jesus in this passage. I identify myself with the sinners.
 
Jesus would be the Catholic son going to his mother’s “wedding” in this analogy.
 
Those situations don’t apply. Jesus was doing the opposite of what you’d have the OP do.
 
I don’t identify myself with Jesus in this passage. I identify myself with the sinners.
Me too…we should be a reflection of Christ…going to show love for a mother while displaying the grace and love we should be seems like a good idea…good way to “catch some fish”…
 
Are you saying the OP should go to the dinner? Eating isn’t sinful, even if you are eating with sinners. Celebrating a same-sex wedding IS sinful. Jesus ate with sinners, he didn’t go bank-robbing with them.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top