D
desales09
Guest
(Spoiler alert: If you’ve heard of this book, which I will leave unnamed, I give away a plot detail which occurs about halfway through the book, because this detail has raised the question I am addressing.)
I’m reading a book about a post-nuclear America, where the characters (a man and his son) live in a burned-up wasteland. Basically, they’re trying to go south, and along the way they encounter horrible people they are trying to avoid. In one scene the man, desparate to get food (which is extremely scarce) stumbles upon a house where the people are engaged in cannibalism. He and his son hide, and come very close to being found by these horrifically depraved people - who, without going into much detail, cause their victims to suffer very much (not necessarily out of sadism, but for reasons of preserving the meat as long as possible where refrigeration isn’t available). While they’re hiding, on the verge of being found, the father is preparing to use the last bullet he has in his gun to shoot his son - because he’d rather him die quickly, then have to suffer at the hands of these monstrous people who treat their victims worse than slaughterhouses treat livestock.
I’m wondering: Is what he was preparing to do morally justified, given the extreme circumstances? Or would faith require a different response?
I’m reading a book about a post-nuclear America, where the characters (a man and his son) live in a burned-up wasteland. Basically, they’re trying to go south, and along the way they encounter horrible people they are trying to avoid. In one scene the man, desparate to get food (which is extremely scarce) stumbles upon a house where the people are engaged in cannibalism. He and his son hide, and come very close to being found by these horrifically depraved people - who, without going into much detail, cause their victims to suffer very much (not necessarily out of sadism, but for reasons of preserving the meat as long as possible where refrigeration isn’t available). While they’re hiding, on the verge of being found, the father is preparing to use the last bullet he has in his gun to shoot his son - because he’d rather him die quickly, then have to suffer at the hands of these monstrous people who treat their victims worse than slaughterhouses treat livestock.
I’m wondering: Is what he was preparing to do morally justified, given the extreme circumstances? Or would faith require a different response?