Morally Permissible Deception?

  • Thread starter Thread starter GraceIsEnough
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
G

GraceIsEnough

Guest
Is it ever morally permissible to omit important information with the intention to deceive if the deception is meant to align one’s behavior with what is morally prescribed? My husband and I are in our early 40s and were married about a year ago, joyful at finally finding the spouse God intented after many long and lonely years of searching. We are practicing Catholics, and often discussed marriage and God’s plan for children during our engagement, and we both (seemingly) agreed with the Church’s teachings on Theology of the Body and NFP. However, after marriage my husband changed his mind on being fully open to children and decided that we should practice NFP indefinitely, until he feels that we are “more bonded”, consistently happy, and have reached certain financial and material milestones that he thinks are necessary for bringing children into the world. He is a wonderful uncle, a generally kind and thoughtful husband, and truly thinks he has our best interest at heart, but he doesn’t seem to understand either the moral implications for his decision or the real consequences on our marriage (I am despairing inside because I cannot understand how a loving Catholic husband would deny his wife a chance to try to create a family together) and potential for ever having children (at 41+ years old it may take years, if ever, for me to conceive). I have spoken to a trusted priest, and his suggestion to me was to continue to pray and be patient and make sure that I do my very best to meet my husband’s emotional, physical, and spiritual needs. I’ve tried to do this, but after all the prayers, novenas, and months of being as selfless and kind and optimistic as I can be, I am deeply discouraged by my husband’s insistance that we need to continue to wait until some future time to try to have children. I am now considering another path – praying as if it is all up to God and acting as if it is all up to me. I am wondering if it would be morally permissible to omit telling my husband when my period starts so that he is misled about my most fertile time, so that he doesn’t abstain from intimacy when we are most likely to conceive. In that case, we would be practicing NFP as intended (not purposefully eliminating the procreative aspect for non-serious reasons), and we would be potentially opening ourselves to God’s graces. I realize that my husband wouldn’t be exercising his free will in this matter. I also realize that the ends might not justify the means, and that two wrongs don’t make a right, but I am not sure whether there is a clear-cut moral answer to my dilemma.
 
I do not think that deception is permissible in this case. Personally, I think that if at 40 he still hasn’t met his financial objectives, he might need to reexamine them (I wanted to be Bill Gates by now - doesn’t look like that’s going to happen but I didn’t let that stop me from allowing God to bless me with children). EDIT: this observation should not be a focal point of your conversations with him.

Perhaps you can persuade him to allow returning to the more “primitive” mode of fertility ignorance. Basically, to put away the charts and not evaluate them for the time being. That state seems to me neither TTA nor TTC and thus you’d be more free to be yourselves.
 
Your sacremental marriage indicates you are bonded and waiting will not change that. As the previous poster stated that two wrongs do not make a right. However, your husband is treating NFP as contraception and, therefore, as far as my catechism understanding is concerned, just as an immoral practice as using contraception. NFP is intended to permit the appropriate spacing but the indefinite period he specified means that he is not open to children. I would hope that he does not have the hidden motivation to wait long enough until you cannot physiologically have children. You need to let him know that by unilaterally changing his mind after your marriage and by making you wait, it is having a negative impact on your marriage and on you, which is the opposite of his stated intentions.
 
I’m not sure what the moral issue with deception is here? Could you elaborate?
 
I’m not sure what the moral issue with deception is here? Could you elaborate?
The OP stated the following:
I am wondering if it would be morally permissible to omit telling my husband when my period starts so that he is misled about my most fertile time, so that he doesn’t abstain from intimacy when we are most likely to conceive.
In effect, she would be lying by ommission by electing not to tell her husband she is in a fertile stage during NFP.
 
The OP stated the following:

In effect, she would be lying by ommission by electing not to tell her husband she is in a fertile stage during NFP.
Ahh, thank you. I read it three times and missed that. 😊

Three issues here:
  1. Honest communication between spouses.
  2. Moral implications of #1
  3. “Tricking” husband into conceiving a child
If the intention is to decieve one’s spouse, no, it is not morally permissible.

Now the question may arise, what if we were having a surprise 50th birthday party, and I told him we were going out alone but we were really going to his surprise party? Sure, the intent here is to deceive, albeit for a mutually good end. But the gravity of the “little white lie” to get hubby to be surprised at his party pales in comparison to lying to him in order to conceive.

We must remember that the end never justifies the means. In the case of the OP, the husband is privilaged to know this information and if it is kept from him, he has been morally wronged.

I would suggest employing the services of a reputable Catholic marriage councelor and a priest. There’s more going on here than meets the eye. 😦
 
Now the question may arise, what if we were having a surprise 50th birthday party, and I told him we were going out alone but we were really going to his surprise party? Sure, the intent here is to deceive, albeit for a mutually good end. But the gravity of the “little white lie” to get hubby to be surprised at his party pales in comparison to lying to him in order to conceive.
Even with the party example, there are ways to withhold the surprise information without resorting to the “white lie”

for example: I’m so glad to have you to myself (unstated: in the car)
 
Ahh, thank you. I read it three times and missed that. 😊

Three issues here:
  1. Honest communication between spouses.
  2. Moral implications of #1
  3. “Tricking” husband into conceiving a child
If the intention is to decieve one’s spouse, no, it is not morally permissible.

Now the question may arise, what if we were having a surprise 50th birthday party, and I told him we were going out alone but we were really going to his surprise party? Sure, the intent here is to deceive, albeit for a mutually good end. But the gravity of the “little white lie” to get hubby to be surprised at his party pales in comparison to lying to him in order to conceive.

We must remember that the end never justifies the means. In the case of the OP, the husband is privilaged to know this information and if it is kept from him, he has been morally wronged.

I would suggest employing the services of a reputable Catholic marriage councelor and a priest. There’s more going on here than meets the eye. 😦
I appreciate all the feedback on my original post, and I’m not surprised by the general consensus that a lie by omission isn’t right. I suppose I was hoping that there was another way of looking at this situation which I hadn’t already considered during my many months of thinking and praying and consulting with others. My husband and I have actually been in separate individual counseling for several months (one attempt for my husband and I to try marital counseling was a terrible failure…he seemed reasonable within the confines of the office but seemed unable to use the communication tools in our day to day interactions, and so I became withdrawn and depressed).

I agree that there are those three issues mentioned above, but beyond hoping for a miracle or resigning myself to a limping marriage, I don’t know how to proceed at this point. This situation is deeply troubling to me, since I waited until around 40 to get married soas NOT to make a mistake, and took discernment very very seriously. My husband and I talked about family and children before marriage, but then afterward he has taken the reins and changed our course, believing that he has our best interests at heart. This wasn’t something I could have known would hapen during our courtship or engagement.

If it is wrong to deceive my husband by not giving him knowlege of my state of fertility during my cycle, it is also wrong for him to use that information to behave in a contraceptive manner by using NFP to block us from having children. On some level it seemed to me that it was like taking the keys away from a drunk driver whose judgment was impaired. I am responsible for my husband’s soul, and to some degree responsible for getting him to heaven. What can I do to help him see that his thinking about God’s plan for marriage is wrong? He either doesn’t know or understand that a sacramental Catholic marriage is ordered toward procreation and education of children (ie: you are supposed to actually try to have them and not merely be open to the idea in some future scenario) and the mutual assistance of the spouses. He seems to persist in the culturally prevalent idea that children are the optional “icing on the cake.” He went to Catholic grade school, college, and graduate school (albeit not for theology), so I thought that this would have been discussed many times during his education. But somehow he never seemed to learn this. And, because he doesn’t know that using NFP to avoid conceiving any children without *grave reasons *is morally wrong, he is not technically committing a mortal sin. So what he is doing is not as wrong as my omitting information to prevent a contraceptive marriage.

Asking him to read the catechism or Humanae Vitae would probably be seen as “lecturing” and me as “talking down” to him. I really don’t want to do that, just help him to reach a full understanding of Church teaching…what I thought he had before we were married. I really do want us to be on the same page (not his page of “waiting until he decides he is ready” but the page of “trusting God”). I want this to knit us closer together instead of being a wedge to drive us further apart. Consulting a good priest is also difficult, because there are very few priests who seem to be aligned with Church teaching on this issue. My fear is that by forcing the issue and begging my husband to go talk to a priest it would just make him angry and even more resistive (most people don’t want to do what they are pushed into agreeing to…me included). Plus, I’m worried that if I do take this final step and ask for a priest to mediate, and my husband rejects what the priest says (and thus Catholic teaching), I will be left with a terrible choice: a) to stay within a marriage where the vows have been broken and where I will face the prospect of never having a family with my spouse, or b) to leave the marriage and seek annulment. In the latter case there is almost no chance I would ever have a family, given my age. If my husband and I “lose track” of the keys to my cycle and God blesses us with a child, my gut feeling is that my husband would be a wonderful father and open to life in the future. But…there would always be that sad feeling that he wasn’t actively embracing life, and the question of whether he would have chosen self-gift by himself. I don’t know if I could bear that, and my culpability. When weighing all this, I don’t know if I have the faith and the moral strength to keep handing those keys over to my husband, knowing he might keep driving us right over a cliff. But if I don’t, we might still end up in a terrible situation. Please, please, please pray for us!
 
I really feel for your situation and I will pray for you. Hopefully, your husband will relent and you can start having children.

Lord, I do not know what to ask of thee.
Thou knowest better than us what our needs are.
Help us to see clearly which we do not see.

We put all trust in thee.

Amen
 
If it is wrong to deceive my husband by not giving him knowlege of my state of fertility during my cycle, it is also wrong for him to use that information to behave in a contraceptive manner by using NFP to block us from having children. On some level it seemed to me that it was like taking the keys away from a drunk driver whose judgment was impaired. I am responsible for my husband’s soul, and to some degree responsible for getting him to heaven. What can I do to help him see that his thinking about God’s plan for marriage is wrong? He either doesn’t know or understand that a sacramental Catholic marriage is ordered toward procreation and education of children (ie: you are supposed to actually try to have them and not merely be open to the idea in some future scenario) and the mutual assistance of the spouses. He seems to persist in the culturally prevalent idea that children are the optional “icing on the cake.” He went to Catholic grade school, college, and graduate school (albeit not for theology), so I thought that this would have been discussed many times during his education. But somehow he never seemed to learn this. And, because he doesn’t know that using NFP to avoid conceiving any children without *grave reasons *is morally wrong, he is not technically committing a mortal sin. So what he is doing is not as wrong as my omitting information to prevent a contraceptive marriage.
Grace,

You are correct in both observations. However, he did affirm to the priest at your wedding that he would be accepting of children, though (this is required in the form of the sacrament).

You say you are both receiving counseling. Is this from a loyal, Catholic counselor? Perhaps, both of you should discuss the situation with your priest (individually, if not together).
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top