More anti abortion arguements

  • Thread starter Thread starter royal_archer
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
R

royal_archer

Guest
I don’t know if you all heard these but if not here are a few more “arrows” to add to your quivers:
  1. Per the it’s my body arguement: If there are cojoined twins and both were able to live joined but attempting to sepparate them would cause one to die. Does the twin which would survive the separation opperation have the right to have the other twin “cut off” dooming ot to death? After all, the one twin has a right to say what to do with thier body right?
  2. Per the rape arguement: their theory is if a woman is raped and does not want to live with the child of the man who raped her because it will cause emotional distress . Then if a woman has multiple children with her husband or boyfriend then after they separate if the father were to assault the mother does the mother have the right to abort the child of the man who raped her? Would she even be willing to give them up for addoption? No She would love them just the same regardless of what their father did.
 
I’m a long time prayer warrior and sidewalk counselor. Thanks for the ideas.

Generally, if someone argues something as random as these arguments, they are using what many term as “red herrings”. They are useless arguments to defer attention to something else other than themselves. They are used to stump the counselor and get them to stop talking. It’s meant to catch people off guard and, really, it allows for the pro-abortion person to reassure themselves in their decision.

Surprisingly, many women consider babies they conceived and gave birth to from rape a compensation for the horrors they went through. This has been proven in psychological studies. Just an add-on I thought was pretty interesting. 🙂
 
I’m a long time prayer warrior and sidewalk counselor. Thanks for the ideas.

Generally, if someone argues something as random as these arguments, they are using what many term as “red herrings”. They are useless arguments to defer attention to something else other than themselves. They are used to stump the counselor and get them to stop talking. It’s meant to catch people off guard and, really, it allows for the pro-abortion person to reassure themselves in their decision.

Surprisingly, many women consider babies they conceived and gave birth to from rape a compensation for the horrors they went through. This has been proven in psychological studies. Just an add-on I thought was pretty interesting. 🙂
I assume that when you are in a discussion in a public forum that even if the person you are talking with has their heart hardened, there are others listening in who may be influenced. I also found that many pro abortion types have not really thought through their beliefs and only have a hand full of canned excuses if you can get past those excuses you might be able to make them actually face the reality of what they are advocating.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top